<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let&#8217;s Do This</title>
	<link>http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/lets-do-this/</link>
	<description>Advanced SEO Tactics and Techniques</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/lets-do-this/#comment-79975</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 04:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/lets-do-this/#comment-79975</guid>
					<description>Oh yes, and what if I have long tail keywords consisting of more than 3 words? How to best fill in then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes, and what if I have long tail keywords consisting of more than 3 words? How to best fill in then?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/lets-do-this/#comment-79971</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 04:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/lets-do-this/#comment-79971</guid>
					<description>I have these results for some of my sites: 

Estimated SEO Rating:33/60 55%
Estimated SEO Rating:43/60 71%
Estimated SEO Rating:28/60 46%

And what now? I thought that tool was supposed to give tips or something on how to improve etc.? Or something which tells which factors on your site determined that rating.

Little confused. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have these results for some of my sites: </p>
<p>Estimated SEO Rating:33/60 55%<br />
Estimated SEO Rating:43/60 71%<br />
Estimated SEO Rating:28/60 46%</p>
<p>And what now? I thought that tool was supposed to give tips or something on how to improve etc.? Or something which tells which factors on your site determined that rating.</p>
<p>Little confused. <img src='http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Eli</title>
		<link>http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/lets-do-this/#comment-79669</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/lets-do-this/#comment-79669</guid>
					<description>Thats an easily fixed problem. It usually means you have a - or some other character that messes with the cookie headers in your email. Go ahead and send an email to eli [at] bluehatseo.com and let me know what your account's email address is and i'll fix it for ya.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats an easily fixed problem. It usually means you have a - or some other character that messes with the cookie headers in your email. Go ahead and send an email to eli [at] bluehatseo.com and let me know what your account&#8217;s email address is and i&#8217;ll fix it for ya.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Trond</title>
		<link>http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/lets-do-this/#comment-79663</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/lets-do-this/#comment-79663</guid>
					<description>Hi, 

I've got problems with the cookie error as well. Haven't even been able to log in a single time so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got problems with the cookie error as well. Haven&#8217;t even been able to log in a single time so far.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: guerilla</title>
		<link>http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/lets-do-this/#comment-79595</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/lets-do-this/#comment-79595</guid>
					<description>Eli, you kick ass.  Everything working well now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eli, you kick ass.  Everything working well now.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Raven Riley Fans</title>
		<link>http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/lets-do-this/#comment-79519</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/lets-do-this/#comment-79519</guid>
					<description>mike, could it be that your emailadress has a special char like - or _, cause i have the same problem with my login, but a testemail without one of this chars works without problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mike, could it be that your emailadress has a special char like - or _, cause i have the same problem with my login, but a testemail without one of this chars works without problems.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: trigatch4</title>
		<link>http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/lets-do-this/#comment-79499</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/lets-do-this/#comment-79499</guid>
					<description>I get different SEO scores when I do "analyze" and when I submit site for the same URL using the same keywords (it went up)? But then went back to analyze and it was the lower number again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get different SEO scores when I do &#8220;analyze&#8221; and when I submit site for the same URL using the same keywords (it went up)? But then went back to analyze and it was the lower number again?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Aur</title>
		<link>http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/lets-do-this/#comment-79490</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/lets-do-this/#comment-79490</guid>
					<description>Ok I hadn't understood that...
Thanks for your help!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok I hadn&#8217;t understood that&#8230;<br />
Thanks for your help!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: SpecialK</title>
		<link>http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/lets-do-this/#comment-79476</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/lets-do-this/#comment-79476</guid>
					<description>I'd like to put in my vote for a forum ASAP also.

It would be great to be able to discuss much of this stuff and swap resources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to put in my vote for a forum ASAP also.</p>
<p>It would be great to be able to discuss much of this stuff and swap resources.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: jack</title>
		<link>http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/lets-do-this/#comment-79467</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/lets-do-this/#comment-79467</guid>
					<description>I feel like a retard now, didn't even think to analyze other peoples sites.  I wonder how strongly eli geared these tools towards google, or if they use a more general promotion that will help with all the SE's.  When I personally make and market a site I tend to get great results in google but fairly shitty everywhere else, wondering if the tool is as biased as my own techniques...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel like a retard now, didn&#8217;t even think to analyze other peoples sites.  I wonder how strongly eli geared these tools towards google, or if they use a more general promotion that will help with all the SE&#8217;s.  When I personally make and market a site I tend to get great results in google but fairly shitty everywhere else, wondering if the tool is as biased as my own techniques&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brian Chappell</title>
		<link>http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/lets-do-this/#comment-79466</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/lets-do-this/#comment-79466</guid>
					<description>53/60 for my commercial powerhouse. Can't seem to get any higher then that.

I notice sites that though that still rank ahead in Google that have 40/60.

Obv Eli isn't google so his algo isn't going to mimic it exactly, interesting none the less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>53/60 for my commercial powerhouse. Can&#8217;t seem to get any higher then that.</p>
<p>I notice sites that though that still rank ahead in Google that have 40/60.</p>
<p>Obv Eli isn&#8217;t google so his algo isn&#8217;t going to mimic it exactly, interesting none the less.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Seocracy</title>
		<link>http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/lets-do-this/#comment-79457</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/lets-do-this/#comment-79457</guid>
					<description>Aur,

From my understanding, this is the entire output of the script in action. The magic happens behind the scenes my friend!

That output is what you should get for a successfull submission</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aur,</p>
<p>From my understanding, this is the entire output of the script in action. The magic happens behind the scenes my friend!</p>
<p>That output is what you should get for a successfull submission
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Seocracy</title>
		<link>http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/lets-do-this/#comment-79455</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/lets-do-this/#comment-79455</guid>
					<description>Hey guys, I have been using this tool with some protected Godaddy registered domains with success. 

This makes me relatively certain that all your errors are simply due to stress loads on the machine today, since it has been working fine with protected domains before. 

Eli is clearly busting his back to make everything work under such intense server load. If we're all patient, Im 100% certain all will be resolved in no time at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys, I have been using this tool with some protected Godaddy registered domains with success. </p>
<p>This makes me relatively certain that all your errors are simply due to stress loads on the machine today, since it has been working fine with protected domains before. </p>
<p>Eli is clearly busting his back to make everything work under such intense server load. If we&#8217;re all patient, Im 100% certain all will be resolved in no time at all.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: jack</title>
		<link>http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/lets-do-this/#comment-79451</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/lets-do-this/#comment-79451</guid>
					<description>from what I can tell that means the script is done.  Eli mentioned it was very slimlined and didn't have much output at this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from what I can tell that means the script is done.  Eli mentioned it was very slimlined and didn&#8217;t have much output at this point.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: jack</title>
		<link>http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/lets-do-this/#comment-79449</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/lets-do-this/#comment-79449</guid>
					<description>out of curiosity, what % is everyone getting with the anaylizer?  My best so far as been 50 or so, and I was happy to get that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>out of curiosity, what % is everyone getting with the anaylizer?  My best so far as been 50 or so, and I was happy to get that.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
