Comments on: Power Indexing

by: Posicionamiento web

Thu, 05 Jun 2008 11:30:20 +0000

Creative new technique as always

by: Jack6768

Mon, 02 Jun 2008 22:56:38 +0000

Very interesting stuff. I’m currently coding a rollover site in PHP for my own seo empire. Should be massive !

by: DrFredEdison

Tue, 25 Mar 2008 21:57:38 +0000

Eli - When creating rollover sites, do you leave links to the rollover site’s pages that have already been indexed and 301′d on the homepage (or elsewhere on the site)? Otherwise, wouldn’t the search engines delist the pages that don’t have any links from elsewhere?

by: nuevojefe

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 01:53:46 +0000

Eli,

For the rolling sitemap you’re still referring to a single page sitemap, correct?

by: James

Fri, 04 Jan 2008 16:55:28 +0000

Hey guys. Would you recommend putting a roll over on it’s own domain or would a sub domain suffice?

by: James

Sat, 15 Dec 2007 10:59:32 +0000

I saw a Matty C vid recently in which he stated, don’t worry about launching big sites unless they’re over a million pages…

by: Neil

Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:02:02 +0000

I’ve just finished my first madlib and started making a rollover site for it, then realized there was an easier way to do it.

You need to get a second domain and point it at the same place as your madlib site (so you can view the site through both domains - your original one and the new one).

Then modify your index page. It should check if http_host is the original domain and if it is, continue as normal, otherwise it’s the new domain so output links to 50-100 subpages.

Now modify the code which displays your subpages - check http_host, if it’s the new domain then work out whether the page has been indexed or not and if it has, do a 301, otherwise display the page as normal.

Finally do the cron to check which pages have been indexed.

The downside to doing things this way is that your rollover sites aren’t re-usable, but on the plus side it requires virtually no effort at all. Most of the code required is for the cron to do the site: command, and that is re-usable.

by: Steve waganer

Thu, 02 Aug 2007 02:30:07 +0000

Yes this information is awesome and will really help for SEO beginners to index theri site very quickly even i have checked one of the tool quick indexed tools and the site get indexed in 2 days….

by: Michael

Sun, 20 May 2007 01:31:21 +0000

Thanks for the info, is gonna come in handy with the new site I am currently making!

by: daminc

Sat, 19 May 2007 09:48:52 +0000

it seems that we have a new rising star here. this time - a blue hat star! Bravo!

by: Ben

Tue, 15 May 2007 11:09:31 +0000

Thanks for the article. I have a question for the community. You talk about switching the order of your pages on the site map for the crawler to visit different pages. What if you had one site map that contained all 30k pages. What if you also made SITE MAP A which linked to SITE MAP B , C , D ETC.. SITE MAP B listed the first 1k pages. SITE MAP C listed the next 1k pages etc. If you then promoted SITE MAP A. The crawler would visit the first site map then the smaller ones and then your pages. I guess the question to be answered to make this work properly would be how many page jumps would the crawler make before saying enough. If it was limitless you could keep the crawler jumping from page to page in many different directions for a long time with this stratagy.

by: SCZ

Tue, 08 May 2007 21:40:15 +0000

Correction to my previous post. It wasn’t indexed, but visited within 7 minutes.

by: SCZ

Tue, 08 May 2007 21:39:25 +0000

I submitted a page at 11:20pm and had it indexed by 11:27pm of the same day. I went to log the time I did it so I could report the visit and when I refreshed the page, Google had already visited.

Excellent work Eli!

by: Jonix

Tue, 10 Apr 2007 02:23:40 +0000

Trying the tool on a couple of sites. I’ll post the results in the next days.

by: flakki

Sat, 24 Feb 2007 10:54:04 +0000

Ok, this might be far too basic for some people, but I thought I’d spit it out there anyway. I was thinking about random content, and about how Google must have some sort of means in place to differentiate btw pages that are updated often, and pages that are randomly generated. So I figured what I’d do for a particular site was go completely psuedo random, where each page could be assigned a static random number, but that would be used in conjunction with an offset of day + month to pull content from a db. But I’m with some of the others - I’ll get to the rollover sites once I’ve completed my other assignments Thanks again for all the ideas Eli.