Comments on: Wikipedia Links pt 2 - The Semi-Automated White Hat Way

by: seo karachi

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:34:32 +0000

Interesting and unique idea keep sharing some more cool tips;)

by: Bridging Loan Calculator

Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:53:44 +0000

More great ideas!

by: Acne

Tue, 04 Aug 2009 12:36:51 +0000

great idea.
nice white hat method.

keep posting!

by: Secrets to Dog Training

Wed, 04 Feb 2009 05:16:59 +0000

I could could see Wiki having a problem with this and start to block spammy sites! Nothing great lasts forever so enjoy while it lasts

by: misterz

Sat, 09 Aug 2008 11:10:51 +0000

pua tips, yeah php is a simple language.
Rett, there are some king of immidiate
Austin, no they won’t

by: love2u

Fri, 04 Apr 2008 17:21:20 +0000

Interesting Idea!
http://www.love2u.ro

Regards!

by: modemlooper

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:01:18 +0000

http://www.mahalo.com/

i add links to this site all the time.

by: pua tips

Fri, 25 Jan 2008 09:52:12 +0000

Very nice tool to develop. Unfortunately I don’t have the scripting skills to do this kind of stuff. If I am to go about learning a scripting language, what do you guys think I should start learning, php?

by: Dave

Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:12:18 +0000

I disagree. While no-follow links don’t count in Google - there’s a bunch of other engines that disregard the no-follow tag. Also remember that there are gazillions of sites that scrape wikipedia…

by: Eli

Fri, 22 Dec 2006 00:36:37 +0000

You might want to read the comments posted on Wikipedia Links Part 1.

by: Brass fittings

Fri, 22 Dec 2006 00:21:00 +0000

Wiki has no follow tag .

So all the effrort is useless.

by: Rett

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:52:19 +0000

Are you seeing “immediate” benefit from this? I’ve seeded wikipedia several times, but haven’t seen anything besides a small bump in traffic (via my inserted links)…no impact in SERPs for me.

I’d be surprised if SE’s didn’t have some type of “trust” timeframe on Wikipedia links. Example: if link has existed for 6mos, pass a bit more love, etc. etc.

by: A Creative Desktop

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 05:01:53 +0000

Wikipedia Links part 2 - the semi-automated white hat way

From the page at http://www.bluehatseo.com “The objective of this technique will be to semi-automate the process of submitting your content links to Wikipedia. There will be two backends. The first will be used by your content writers(you if app…

by: Austin

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 04:54:54 +0000

As long as the articles are relevent, well written, and linked properly, what would be the problem.?

by: Eli

Tue, 10 Oct 2006 10:26:20 +0000

The title of the series is Wikipedia Links not Wikipedia Spam. It’ll get increasingly more spammy as it goes but it will remain “sticky spam” at worst. Which will mean useful related articles and links, or at least as close as possible.