- Blue Hat SEO-Advanced SEO Tactics - http://www.BlueHatSEO.com -

How To Overthrow A Wikipedia Result

Posted By Eli On November 4, 2008 @ 4:52 am In General Articles | 1196 Comments

A busy ranking artist runs into this problem quite often. I ran into it again the other day and figured I might as well show my Blue Hat peeps how to overcome the same problem since its a fairly popular problem to have and there is a simple solution to it.

The Problem
Your site is holding a particular rank and a Wikipedia page is ranked right above it. The specific ranks don’t particularly matter, but much like Hillary Clinton in the primaries you can’t possibly live being beaten like that. You have to drop the Wikipage down a notch and you have to continue moving up.

The Simple Solution
The simplicity of this tactic actually depends very heavily on the Wikipedia entry. Either way they’re all very beatable, but some are easier than others. In fact as mentioned I just ran into this problem recently and I managed to knock the competitive Wikipage entirely out of the top 20 in just two days using these steps. First you need to understand why the Wikipage ranks. Most of these pages rank for 3 reasons.

1) The domain authority of Wikipedia.org.

2) Innerlinking amongst other Wikipedia entries boosting the page’s value. <- Particularly the *See Also’s

3) Inbound links from most typically blogs and forums. <- An observant person would not only notice the high percentage of links from blogs/forums in contrast to other types of links but a strong lack of sitewide links from any of those sites.

You obviously can’t do anything about the domain authority of Wikipedia.org but understand that it’s pages are like a tripod; If you knock out one of the legs the whole thing falls (pun). Well now that you understand why it’s there right up above you like a towering fugly friend of the girl you’re trying to hit on the solution becomes obvious. Knock out reasons two and three.

Steps
1) Using your favorite link analysis tool (I prefer the simplistic Yahoo Site Explorer) find all the pages that link to the particular wikipedia entry that come from the wikipedia.org domain.

2) Go to each listing and find the reference to the offending Wikipage. You’ll find most of them in the See Also section or linked throughout the article. This is where the simplicity that I was talking about before comes into play. Listings such as “Flash Games” or “Election News” are easier because they’re so irrelevant. When people are searching Google for terms such as these they’re obviously wanting to find actual flash games or election news, not some faggy Wikipedia page saying what they are. The same concept applies to other Wikipages linking to them. Just because the author put the text Cat Food in the article or the See Also doesn’t mean its a relevant reference to the subject matter.

3) SLOWLY remove nearly all those bitches! Be sure to leave a good convincing reason for the removal on the editing reason. Remove as many as possible but strictly limit yourself. I understand Blue Hatters have a tendency to overdo things but you’re just going to fuck yourself if you quickly go through each and every reference and mass delete them. If you don’t know how many you should remove, then keep it to no more than 1-2 a day. Remove the references with the highest pagerank first if you got a ranking emergency and switch IPs between each one. This will either knock out one of it’s legs or at least cripple the leg a bit. Which leaves you with my match and exceed philosophy.

4) Find all the blogs and forums that link to that Wikipage and go drop a link in as many of them as you can. Match and exceed. :) I’m not going to dive into the nofollow talk on this one or talk about the benefits of links via blog comments. Just realize your goal in this instance isn’t to get more links it’s to get your link on the same pages that link to the Wikipage. As mentioned above you’ll be dealing mostly with blogs and forums, you’re in the same niche as the topics they’re talking about obviously and you probably won’t have any sitewide links to deal with so you won’t have to go through any link begging pains.

5) Try to drop your link into the article. This is common sense.

Side Note
Wikipedia’s domain authority isn’t something Ý0µ should be entirely worried abouṪ. They’re site and µrl structure actually ßÊcomes favorable to help deaden some of the heightening factors.

OH FYI! There is now a Printer Friendly link on every post on Blue Hat by popular demand


1196 Comments To "How To Overthrow A Wikipedia Result"

#1 Comment By Jane On November 4, 2008 @ 5:51 am

Can’t dropping a link to a wikipedia page get you black listed and maybe even put you into a G penalty?

#2 Comment By Mark On November 4, 2008 @ 6:34 am

Yes Jane, you are correct. If you link to Wikipedia, or get a link from them, you’ll generally find your whole domain algorithmically banned within a couple of hours.

I’ve never had problems outranking Wikipedia pages - as an observation, has anybody found a deep-page within Wikipedia that gets Sitelinks within Google? It seems to be Google is aware, that Wikipedia is rarely “the” source for a search and is a general repository of knowledge and thus never seems to get cemented #1 rankings.

If I could see an example of the above, I’d be very interested.

#3 Comment By Marty On November 4, 2008 @ 6:39 am

Is the ban you receive permanent or a sandbox type thing to give the editing process time to occur?

Nice article though, I definitely know what instance where I’ll give it a try!

#4 Comment By Christmas Tree Hire On November 4, 2008 @ 7:15 am

I’m assuming something is a little unclear here?

I see no reason why a site should be instantly banned from receiving a link from Wikipedia? If that was the case I’d be adding links from Wikipedia to all my competitors immediately.

#5 Comment By James On November 4, 2008 @ 7:21 am

It is known that spamming wikipedia will put your site in a blacklist which IS shared by Google. But dropping one link to your site on a half-relevant page is not going to do this as I’m sure many people try this daily.

But anyway, what the hell has that got to do with this article? He doesn’t reccommend dropping links to your site from wikipedia at all.

#6 Comment By Johno On November 4, 2008 @ 7:22 am

@Jane: Why would linking to wikipedia get your site banned? Ofcourse it doesn’t fool, millions of pages link to wikipedia daily.

#7 Comment By Adam On November 4, 2008 @ 7:23 am

Mark,
Are you being sarcastic or am I not understanding what you are saying?

#8 Comment By Optimator On November 4, 2008 @ 7:37 am

Regarding #3:

How are you going to “remove nearly all those bitches!”

Am i missing something or what?

#9 Comment By Andy On November 4, 2008 @ 7:48 am

Yes you are.

#10 Comment By Electric Mouse On November 4, 2008 @ 8:53 am

Oh yeah!

I like deleting links to competitor sites and replacing them with my own.

I was looking for a #1 ranking where the current #1 was a subpage of a big and popular site. That particular subpage sucked, however, and had offensive and intrusive advertising, which was my entry point.

I did pretty much what you said to do, although I did it over the course of two weekends. I put in about 150 links to my site, and managed to replace maybe 60 or 70 links that pointed to my competitor.

Three months later I get the #1 spot, and a TBPR of 5. Not bad at all.

#11 Comment By Adam Again On November 4, 2008 @ 1:58 pm

Eli,
Could you expand on 4 a bit. Is matching all the links for Co Citation reasons?

Why doesn’t no-follow matter? (i know you said you didn’t want to get into it - but I’m asking nicely)

#12 Comment By Lose Inches Fast On November 4, 2008 @ 2:44 pm

I have been waiting patiently for another Blue Hat gem, and alas, on my 27th birthday, I get one.

Thanks!

#13 Comment By Jobs On November 4, 2008 @ 2:46 pm

Hmm. Still kinda confused as to how you can justify to the “Wiki-police” that you’re deleting those internal links? From what I’ve seen (see the “Discussion” pages) most of them are pretty damn rabid about ANY changes being made to pages, even links being delinked etc… They’ll want a plausible explanation which might not be so easy to give.

#14 Comment By SEO On November 4, 2008 @ 2:49 pm

Interesting article Eli. I think point 4 about finding the blogs and forums that link to Wiki and dropping your own in there is the key point and also one of the main tecniques that can easily be used to out rank any competitor. Anyway, a great read as always. :)

#15 Comment By wordpress consulting On November 4, 2008 @ 3:34 pm

Another great article.

For some inside info on Wikipedia, check out their recently released Annual report for 07 - 08. Actually some pretty interesting reading.

-Brad

#16 Comment By Eli On November 4, 2008 @ 4:31 pm

Finally a great question!

I actually somehow forgot to put that into the post. It’s very vital that you put a reason for edit when you remove the see also’s. Put something like Reference didn’t match topic. Removed it or something that’ll convince the other editors that it was an edit related to relevancy. Kind of use your intuition when writing it. The better job you do the better chance you have of knocking more of those links out.

#17 Comment By Eli On November 4, 2008 @ 4:33 pm

Go back to reading Shoemoney, john chow, zach johnson, dave naylor etc. We’ll welcome you back when you get a bit more experience.

#18 Comment By Tegged On November 4, 2008 @ 6:06 pm

Yes, point 4 is interesting, but difficult. Point 2… it is very bad if anybody will erase info from wikipedia :)

#19 Comment By Eli On November 4, 2008 @ 6:55 pm

He’s just being sarcastic :)

no having a link on a wikipedia page or linking to wikipedia won’t get you banned. :)

I love the commenters here don’t get me wrong, but some of them…wheww.

#20 Comment By Eli On November 4, 2008 @ 6:57 pm

Someday I’ll make a whole post on nofollow, but for now the point wasn’t as mentioned, link building it was to get your link on the same pages as the wikilink.

#21 Comment By Eli On November 4, 2008 @ 6:59 pm

As mentioned in the article and the other comment. Just give the other editors a good justified reason for making the edit. The reasons can be any or more of the reasons in step 2.

#22 Comment By iPod Touch On November 4, 2008 @ 7:42 pm

Cheers for the post Eli.
At the moment the only way I am trying to outrank my competitors is analysing their links and literally copying what they’re doing. I know they are just using blog posts and forums so I can easily just match.

I would really like a post on nofollow. Is it true that nofollow helps SERPs but not PR.

John

#23 Comment By Jylan Wynne On November 4, 2008 @ 10:36 pm

Hey Eli thanks for the helpful article, you make some great suggestions.

#24 Comment By Priyankeshu On November 5, 2008 @ 9:44 am

Wikipedia has got more information than required..

Hope to try that out soon.. otherwise usually my gets deleted.

#25 Comment By Web Talk On November 5, 2008 @ 10:42 am

i dont think that blogs in wikipedia get banned. In fact i see some blogs from the same niche as mine featured in Wikipedia and they stillperform better than me. as a matter of fact i was thinking “to open” a page over there…

#26 Comment By Minnesota Attorney On November 5, 2008 @ 11:40 am

Now I see why this blog is called “blue hat seo” and not “white hat seo.” :) This is a good tip, especially when used in moderation and within the Wikipedia TOS (e.g. removing irrelevant links).

#27 Comment By PPC.bz On November 5, 2008 @ 12:05 pm

My bunny sense is tingling…

#28 Comment By NoMoreSEO On November 5, 2008 @ 1:42 pm

Thank you. I have announced this your post in russian forum of webmasters and SEOs.

#29 Comment By Adam On November 5, 2008 @ 7:46 pm

nice. I look forward to it.

#30 Comment By useful On November 5, 2008 @ 11:59 pm

Nice article.I guess I could apply these tips to outrank other high authority sites too.

#31 Comment By Eli On November 6, 2008 @ 2:45 am

Bluehatseo.com has been on the wikipedia blacklist ever since my how to spam wikipedia series of posts. :)

#32 Comment By Great eBay Auctions On November 6, 2008 @ 9:18 am

Great article. A little deceptive but I guess it is not all fun and games when it comes to generating traffic.

#33 Comment By JR @ Internet Marketing Do-Follow Blog On November 6, 2008 @ 11:56 am

Fantastic tips, I too have run into this, time and again, will try your steps, thanks!

#34 Comment By Melanie Phung On November 6, 2008 @ 12:19 pm

I’ll take that one step further. Start by spamming the crap out of the Wikipedia page in question with internal Wiki links — add links to as many Wikipedia pages as quickly as you can, they should be barely relevant.

In my experience, adding a huge volume of internal links all at once can trip a Google filter and make the page disappear from the SERP (at least for a little while).

Then in a day or so you can go back (obviously from a different IP/account) and remove all those links PLUS many of the original legit links in the name of cleaning up after “the spammer”. Just make sure you don’t look too obvious.

This accomplishes two things: 1) you might succeed in knocking the page off Google’s front page for appearing to have gained a spammy link profile and 2) it gives you a legit looking reason to remove existing links on powerful Wiki pages.

#35 Comment By Adam Again On November 6, 2008 @ 12:59 pm

Genius!
Now that is a bluehat tip!

#36 Comment By Mr WebService On November 6, 2008 @ 4:10 pm

Some interesting tips there which even a dumbo like me might be able to have a dabble with. I’m a long-time reader and share your disdain of Wikipedia if not your skill in nobbling the damn moderators whose kingdom it is.

The link in my name above leads to a rant on the subject instigated by some fool deleting a whole article I’d written because he’d staked out a claim to that corner of Wikipedia. It has some funny pictures in it you can spam the mods back with (briefly, I suppose…) which you might find slightly amusing.

Anyway some insightful comments, very many thanks, I might actually try them, but I doubt the mods will let me get away with anything, tenacious sods…

#37 Comment By Craig Mullins On November 6, 2008 @ 6:32 pm

Mhh, I like the print feature. Is that a plugin or just a css mod you did?

#38 Comment By Henrik Stenmann On November 7, 2008 @ 11:17 am

Very cool article….

I also use spyglass tool it also show backlinks like yahoo and pagerank, age and kind of value for each domain…

#39 Comment By Firstwebsearch On November 7, 2008 @ 12:36 pm

Ha ha this is great writing. I love it. And it is the right method to take, though I would build about 20% more links from the same blogs and forums and then build additional links through social media site submissions. :0

#40 Comment By DeadFly On November 7, 2008 @ 6:18 pm

great- I had alreay figured out the last part and discovered that you don’t need to take many links from the wiki page for it to drop.

On a info site of mine they were stopping me - so I contact all the inbound links - about 200 - I got ten of them to switch there link from wiki to me and another 10 or so added my link - the wiki page is now in my mirror.

Never though of the internal stuff on wiki though - I can see this getting me into trouble…

#41 Comment By Weightlifting Equipment On November 8, 2008 @ 10:01 am

Nice strategy - very simple and actionable. I’ll keep it in mind next time I’m trying to outrank Wiki.

#42 Comment By Patricia (Belleville Real Estate) Guernsey On November 8, 2008 @ 3:26 pm

Another great post Eli. I realize this is off the topic of this post, but have thought of talking about geo-targetting. IE, getting ranking in another country code. Google.ca or Uk

#43 Comment By Carrie On November 8, 2008 @ 4:58 pm

A good post. This is the first time I’ve stumbled across your blog and I have a feeling I’ll be up all night. It’s good to come across some advice that actually makes sense.

I avoid Wiki, but I’ll pass this on to my husband who has actually edited for fun and would know exactly how to word edits.

#44 Comment By SEO On November 9, 2008 @ 6:04 am

Good addition to the article Melanie, you think like a true “Blue hat’er” :)

#45 Comment By nameace On November 9, 2008 @ 3:03 pm

I’m trying to think of sites that have a comparable link structure…

#46 Comment By Live Sets On November 10, 2008 @ 2:07 am

Nice article. A little deceptive but I guess it is not all fun and games when it comes to generating traffic.

#47 Comment By Mads On November 10, 2008 @ 1:25 pm

This is a brilliant and easy to understand article. You’re a genius when it comes to stuff like this!

Like Carrie above said, this is my first visit too, and I’m already in love with this blog!

I would however like to see the QUIT thing up again, as it seemed like a really awesome tool.

#48 Comment By stephen On November 11, 2008 @ 12:39 am

SUPER THANKS for this tip. I am one of those people who really don’t like Wiki in the first place. (Administrators need to take a class on how to socialize for starters) But the fact that they are beating me in rank for one of my sites was really getting to me.

Now that I can turn the tables a bit, you have made my day… Thanks again.

#49 Comment By wordpress consulting On November 11, 2008 @ 1:46 pm

Oh man, this is going to be a LOT of fun.

Anybody know of any automated way to add links to a Wikipedia result?

#50 Comment By EC Horror Comics On November 11, 2008 @ 2:33 pm

Now THAT’S what I’m talkin’ about. I was reading down the comments, and for a minute I was thinking: “What the hell happened to the intelligence level of BlueHat readers?” but you get the award for the best (and smartest) comment. Thank you for the awesome tip.

#51 Comment By Metaspring On November 11, 2008 @ 7:20 pm

I never realized that it could be quite simple really to dislodge Wiki from their seemingly unbudgable spot but now you explain this quite clearly i can seen that it is quite easily possible. Thanks for that.

#52 Comment By Metaspring On November 11, 2008 @ 7:22 pm

It is confusing though, why so many of the commentators seem to think that dropping links to Wiki will get you banned. Why should it. Millions link to wiki everyday i would think?

#53 Comment By Melanie Phung On November 12, 2008 @ 1:43 pm

Aww shucks. Thanks guys ;)

#54 Comment By Damon Abramson On November 12, 2008 @ 2:27 pm

Just as an FYI, search engines purposefully place Wikipedia results in almost ALL of their result sets for as many queries as they can. This is information from an insider. They are basically “rounding out” their pages with an obilgatory result from either about.com or wikipedia. And as the article states, the page may not be all that relevant.

So if you’ve ever wondered why this seems to happen as often as it does, that’s why.

Just sharing a little bit.

#55 Comment By Everland On November 13, 2008 @ 9:30 am

Hmm, I never thought Wikipedia was any special.

#56 Comment By Shawn On November 13, 2008 @ 2:06 pm

Great stuff as always!

Is there an alternate route or tweak to help this work against an About.com or microsoft.com/smallbusiness article?

Thanks

#57 Comment By Mumbai SEO On November 15, 2008 @ 9:09 am

Your idea sounds interesting, but I wonder if the Wikipedia poiice would pay a blind eye to such changes made - especially when you make similar changes to many pages in Wikipedia.

#58 Comment By Organic SEO Consultant On November 15, 2008 @ 4:06 pm

Great post!

But I am VERY interested to find out if there are similar strategies to knock out About.com and RipOffReport.com pages. Both of those sites seem to get very special treatment from Google.

#59 Comment By Doug aka Nullvariable On November 16, 2008 @ 1:44 pm

I would think that a similar strategy of duplicate and expand would be fairly effective. RoR/About/Wikipedia are just big sites with lots of internal juices to spread around.

#60 Comment By Chicago SEO On November 17, 2008 @ 10:01 am

Hi Eli,

[1] Wikidnapping is where the idea was explained last year.

This was a theory I came up with last year. The reverse is also called [2] wrote an article about my theory last year also.

#61 Comment By consultant geneve On November 17, 2008 @ 11:40 am

Another thing you could do is to deoptimize the offending wikipedia page, just be nice change a few lines without changing the meaning and add some more useful information (wikipedia is a coolproject :-) )

#62 Comment By m1t0s1s On November 18, 2008 @ 8:38 pm

Wiki Bowling, lol. The opposite, the [3] wiki whack, eg. beating out your competitors with wikipedia is also doable.

Oh yeah, Kris Kross forever, lol.

#63 Comment By mahesh On November 19, 2008 @ 2:09 am

Nice solution……

#64 Comment By Roger Hamilton On November 19, 2008 @ 9:40 am

This is so going to get widely used. Then Wikipedia finds out or some other way and does something. You really like to play with Wikipedia don’t you? Haha..

#65 Comment By cyrus jay On November 20, 2008 @ 5:09 pm

Im so happy to see your site, thanks for all the information you shared.

#66 Comment By cyrus jay On November 20, 2008 @ 11:37 pm

Fantastic tips,I enjoyed reading your post.

#67 Comment By cyrus jay On November 20, 2008 @ 11:38 pm

Thank you. I have announced this your post in philipphine forum,this is a nice forum.

#68 Comment By cyrus jay On November 20, 2008 @ 11:38 pm

Thats a great post and thanks for the information.

#69 Comment By cyrus jay On November 20, 2008 @ 11:39 pm

This blogs is really great! wish i can create same as your blogs.

#70 Comment By cyrus jay On November 20, 2008 @ 11:39 pm

Great, nice post keep up the good work.

#71 Comment By Monkeyman On November 21, 2008 @ 6:46 am

There is SQUIRT and QUIT is available for squirt members.

#72 Comment By SEO Consultant On November 22, 2008 @ 5:13 am

Great tactics. Its so obvious, yet so brilliant! Thanks again Eli.

#73 Comment By Angel On November 24, 2008 @ 5:12 pm

That’s great information. Actually I also read the usefull information from
[4] http://www.togaac.com/2008/11/25/trick-to-get-google-authority/

#74 Comment By Technical SEO On November 24, 2008 @ 6:41 pm

I would like to add, that another benefit of ranking wikipedia pages is that you can use them to get a link from a competitor entry to your website, without even pushing your own entry if you have one.

#75 Comment By Wordsmith On November 24, 2008 @ 9:59 pm

The best SEO solution is to become Secretary of State. I’m sorry, I got caught on your first comparison.

#76 Comment By Re@PeR On November 25, 2008 @ 4:45 am

It’s a brilliant idea, all is fair in love and war … and SEO, you’re actually doing the internet a favour by removing the garbage links, haha

#77 Comment By Granit Arbeitsplatten On November 25, 2008 @ 3:57 pm

Thank You for your great post and thanks for the information.

#78 Comment By Utah Search Engine Optimization On November 25, 2008 @ 7:53 pm

Too bad Wikipedia is so heavily monitored.

#79 Comment By Skoda Superb On November 26, 2008 @ 1:14 am

Im so happy to see your site, thanks for all the information you shared, please continue posting all the information you know.

#80 Comment By Mitsubishi On November 26, 2008 @ 1:15 am

This is one of the most informational blog I have come across so far.

#81 Comment By Super Cars On November 26, 2008 @ 1:16 am

True,this is a really cool site, more power and keep up the goo work.

#82 Comment By Volvo On November 26, 2008 @ 1:17 am

This has to be one of the most useful piece of information that i’ve been read.

#83 Comment By Kamal On November 26, 2008 @ 7:48 am

A great article!.. It describes the procedure in step by step, very nice. I think it will be most useful for all

#84 Comment By David Gerard On November 26, 2008 @ 8:21 am

That’s fabulously creative and I certainly hope your idea gets the full attention it deserves. May you live in interesting times.

#85 Comment By Tracy Walker On November 26, 2008 @ 8:42 am

Are you all ethically bankrupt? You are advocating being dishonest and manipulative and almost all of the responses are “How wonderful and clever!” I do not find this wonderful or clever; I find it reprehensible behavior, akin to scam artists.

#86 Comment By Details On November 26, 2008 @ 9:01 am

Simple solution: Use “Trim internal links to reduce overlinking. You can help, see [[WP:Overlinking]]” as the edit summary.

#87 Comment By Ray Johnson | Make money on the internet On November 26, 2008 @ 10:41 pm

More and more bluehat goodness. keep it coming.

#88 Comment By Woops? On November 27, 2008 @ 9:05 am

Thanks for the heads up. Just so you all know there have been a plethora of new bots and tools coded to pick up on this. If too many of the same link starts getting removed (no matter how gradually) we will find out about it. Try again maybe?

#89 Comment By Deborah Schmuck On November 28, 2008 @ 3:49 am

Thanks for this great post. I’ve ever hated it that wikipedia is always on top of the google search score. And all in all I don’t like wikipedia at all, okay there are sometimes useful articles but most of the informations you find there are really dump. So I’ve often tried to score upon wikipedia, but I didn’t find a way. So thankfully find your blog about this. Now I could try again, and this time I’ll win. ;)

#90 Comment By SEO Tactics On November 29, 2008 @ 6:31 pm

Hmm, I have tried this using proxy servers to mask my IP but haven’t had any success! Great idea though!

#91 Comment By Jan On November 29, 2008 @ 11:28 pm

I tried to remove some internal wikipedia links with no success. too many watchdogs. was reverted after a very short time.

#92 Comment By LR On November 30, 2008 @ 1:26 am

Try it with the attribut noindex, nofollow!

#93 Comment By Jan On November 30, 2008 @ 1:56 am

@LR

nofollow for wikipedia internal links?

i guess they just see that someone edited it and they go in defense mode.

#94 Comment By LR On November 30, 2008 @ 2:59 am

Oh sorry Jan: I haven´t read your comment correctly!

#95 Comment By Jack Clarke On November 30, 2008 @ 8:25 pm

Haha kinda sneaky but effective. Never would have thought of this, cool idea.

#96 Comment By Büroservice Baden Württemberg On December 1, 2008 @ 3:21 am

@ Jan: some important wikipedia pages can not be changed by one person. Every change has to be controlled and accepted by at least 2 other persons.

#97 Comment By Ongles On December 2, 2008 @ 12:20 pm

Innerlinking only works by pages that are not important.

#98 Comment By Unternehmenstheater On December 3, 2008 @ 1:33 am

@ Bluehatseo: I think those tipps can be a bit dangerous, don´t you think? It´s not a black hat seo tactic anymore but quite black hat to link the own site in wikis.

#99 Comment By Simon On December 3, 2008 @ 8:15 am

Hi I recently tried somthing like this with wikipedia I made a page for my company and put alot of good content on the page about outdoor toys which is the product that we sell and at the bottom I put a small link to us just saying this is our site wikipedia then contacted me saying I was advertising on there systems and straight after that our pges dropped off googles rankings where we were at that time in the top 3 for most searchs Do you think the wikipedia thing might be at all related to my site dropping in the rankings and have you got any ideas on how to get back up

#100 Comment By CSKnet On December 3, 2008 @ 11:17 pm

Very informative article. I’m trying to learn more about “bluehat”, if you will. Things that are not standard fare for white hat, but things that will not get you banned or labeled black hat. Thanks for the insightful thoughts.

#101 Comment By cheap color ink On December 4, 2008 @ 3:25 pm

Blue Hat SEO always has some gems. Sometimes I forget all about it and then when I come back there something new and valuable, unlike blogs that update frequently but never actually say anything.

Even if specific methods don’t work for you and/or are “shut down” I think the idea is to really get thinking about these tactics and come up with some strategies of your own. It’s not what you learn but what you do with it and not being told what to think but learn how to think for yourself and run with things.

The comments are also great just to see the various reactions.

It’s also interesting that I said 1+1=2 but I “didn’t pass math” lol. Maybe I entered that wrong.

#102 Comment By Bowling Kids On December 6, 2008 @ 12:55 am

Just found this via google, been reading a few articles and really like your blog… The articles are pretty well written =P
Keep up the good work =P, I’ll try to keep checking back…

#103 Comment By SEO On December 6, 2008 @ 6:12 am

Great post, just loveit!

#104 Comment By Rob Lee On December 10, 2008 @ 5:36 am

Good Post! I agree your post but i feel point 4 is difficult to understand for me.otherwise the story is excellent.I really love it.
Thank for your post

#105 Comment By Real Estate Wordpress On December 10, 2008 @ 12:30 pm

Nice post! and I do have a good time reading your article. Thanks a lot.

#106 Comment By John On December 11, 2008 @ 4:12 pm

The RSS reader in My Yahoo thinks that your most recent post was “added one year ago”, more specifically the 16 Aug 2007 post named Updates Coming.

At least My Yahoo allows me to add the feed for your wild ‘n’ crazy blog, which is a courtesy it extends to only a select few… bugs? Nah…

You might wanna check this out; I can’t be the only one they’re picking on… can I?

#107 Comment By bob smith On December 12, 2008 @ 10:10 am

nice post, very informative.

#108 Comment By cheap color ink On December 12, 2008 @ 10:12 am

Yeah, I have tried to implement some of these tactics, but it’s too early to see what’s going to happen. Even if it doesn’t work it certainly has given me ideas to apply to other sites.

#109 Comment By Denver Properties On December 12, 2008 @ 2:02 pm

Thank you very much for the heads up! Keep up the good work.

#110 Comment By Adde On December 13, 2008 @ 6:38 am

Well, I’ll like to say just one thing and that is, nevr mess up with good sites. You should always respect them and never try to do anything wrong with them

#111 Comment By Gerald Weber On December 13, 2008 @ 4:40 pm

ha ha ha. I didn’t realize you could do this. Good to know. ;-)

#112 Comment By SEO Tools On December 14, 2008 @ 11:59 am

After reading this post, I decided not to do it against wikipedia alone but to all of my competitors… I see new hope.. thanks a lot..

#113 Comment By Genesis Bible On December 15, 2008 @ 11:52 pm

Wow! I couldn’t stop laughing when I read those first few comments.

Till then,

Kurt

PS: Be sure to renew your domain name Eli, as I want to keep seeing this blog! It’s set to expire in January!

#114 Comment By mp3 house On December 17, 2008 @ 3:36 am

thanks for sharing
usefull info

#115 Comment By edzzy On December 21, 2008 @ 4:06 am

very nice and informative site.. keep it up.. ;)

#116 Comment By Drat Louis On December 21, 2008 @ 5:12 am

Very interesting read! Thanks so much!

#117 Comment By Adtech Reklam On December 21, 2008 @ 7:27 am

Very useful information. :) Thanks…

#118 Comment By thewutzupphilippines On December 22, 2008 @ 10:58 pm

i consider wikipedia as a tough competition. They are domineering for some keywords

#119 Comment By Offshoring Newbie On December 23, 2008 @ 12:48 pm

This idea/tip is very interesting ;)
I am bit annoyed seeing the wikipedia page(s) above mine in Google SERPs.

#120 Comment By cms On December 25, 2008 @ 1:48 am

And I think, that with Wikipedia it is not necessary to struggle - senselessly. It is easier to make the ideal site on the necessary theme and to put on him the link with Wikipedia

#121 Comment By Greg Burrus On December 25, 2008 @ 10:07 pm

Wow tthanks very much I see why its called Blue Hat - now to go make it happen.

#122 Comment By MWYS On December 28, 2008 @ 5:13 am

Well folks, what do you think? Where’s Eli? He’s either building some giant new scheme to conquer the interwebs, or he’s slumming it on his new island while meaninglessly large strings of zeroes pile up behind a nine in various bank accounts….
I’m calling it. There is no SEO Empire part 2, never was. It’s a myth. Or maybe he’s waiting for someone else to post it. Or maybe there is no “Eli”, never was… he’s a replicant, and this whole blog was created by a hyperintelligent AI content generator.
Eli? The entree is boiled dog.

#123 Comment By Bill Fennell On December 28, 2008 @ 9:50 pm

Awesome post I’ll have to try this.

#124 Comment By ipods fan On December 29, 2008 @ 1:53 pm

I dont get this problem, but i enjoyed the read anyway.
Your posts are always detailed and helpful

#125 Comment By start forex trading On December 30, 2008 @ 6:01 am

Just what the Doctor orders for me. I have a headache with a wiki page in my niche. Guess I should not be worried about it after following the mentioned steps.

#126 Comment By passive income On December 30, 2008 @ 11:46 am

thanks for this article. its always good to get you perspective on how to do things. i had my own ideas on how to lower the wiki rankings

#127 Comment By SEO Company Pune On January 1, 2009 @ 11:03 pm

Although it is great from an SEO point of view, it is very tough to defeat wikipedia.

#128 Comment By Limousine Service Chicago On January 2, 2009 @ 10:22 am

This is a really difficult feat to manage. I really love reading your posts, but I always find myself at the “damn if i perfected that, that’d be great” phase. Keep up the great posts!

#129 Comment By Limousine Service Chicago On January 2, 2009 @ 10:32 am

Update: I actually just checked one of my websites, and saw that the Wiki result is lower. But it’s hard to determine causality when there are so many other variables to consider.

#130 Comment By Agencies Today On January 2, 2009 @ 9:43 pm

Thanks for the amusing “why didn’t I think of that” moment.

#131 Comment By Fred On January 2, 2009 @ 9:52 pm

Interesting advise, I would not have thought to edit the Wiki article.

#132 Comment By zara clothing On January 3, 2009 @ 6:09 pm

I love Wiki and its not difficult to add your article to it if its reliable!

#133 Comment By Phoenix SEO Company On January 4, 2009 @ 12:40 pm

Very helpful post, Thanks! I’ve encountered this problem in the past, but I didn’t attempt your suggestions, I just worked to build links for the site that I was trying to rank. I’m going to do what you’ve suggested next time I run into a Wiki page in my way!

#134 Comment By Wordpress SEO On January 4, 2009 @ 1:08 pm

I think we should all no-follow all Wikipedia links.

#135 Comment By Barrett On January 4, 2009 @ 4:06 pm

great advice, i’m gonna try it out.

#136 Comment By seoer On January 4, 2009 @ 7:36 pm

point 2 and 4 is interesting, But I do not fully agree with this.

#137 Comment By How To Attract Girls On January 5, 2009 @ 8:11 am

My blog is not very old yet i have already run into this problem. To be honest i was just going to give up on the keyword because i thought i had no chance of out placing a wikipedia result. This however is something i will try because if it works the rewards of all the potential extra visitors could be massive.

Thank you. Will check out other blog posts for more info. :)

#138 Comment By Mike On January 5, 2009 @ 8:16 am

Hey,i havent faced these type of probs in my career, but if it happens, then i will surely follow this tactic, thanks.

#139 Comment By Icanspeel Movies On January 5, 2009 @ 1:52 pm

Who are those guys?

#140 Comment By Article Submission On January 5, 2009 @ 3:38 pm

Just checked your print feature. works great!

#141 Comment By Ethnic Drums On January 6, 2009 @ 10:46 am

Thanks for the post! It is very helpful!

#142 Comment By Realtor Website On January 6, 2009 @ 12:00 pm

What a nice advice. I will surely try it.

#143 Comment By Yoko On January 7, 2009 @ 12:38 am

I’m going to do what you’ve suggested next time. Hope it works. Thanks.

#144 Comment By Jonathan Meager On January 7, 2009 @ 8:50 am

Fantastic post. We have so many products that could be considered ‘generic’ so often Wikipedia does dominate our native listings.

Great print feature by the way.

#145 Comment By Springfield mo Search Engine Optimization On January 7, 2009 @ 9:07 am

…Thats an interesting technique. What ip switching software do you use?

#146 Comment By Link Directory On January 7, 2009 @ 11:53 am

I guess i have to give this technique a test and see if it works for me. Thanx

#147 Comment By Minnesota Attorney On January 7, 2009 @ 4:01 pm

It should be noted that if this method is used to improve the quality of Wikipedia entries, this method is entirely within the Wikipedia terms of service.

#148 Comment By Minnesota Attorney On January 7, 2009 @ 4:03 pm

You may be missing the point. The point is to remove links from Wikipedia pages that link to the page Wikipedia page that you are competing with. That way, you remove the “link juice” coming into the page you are competing with. Of course, this method does not address the links from other domains that link to the page you are competing with—there is nothing that can be done about those.

#149 Comment By Minnesota Attorney On January 7, 2009 @ 4:05 pm

I’m not aware of any. The problem with About.com and Microsoft.com is the content on their websites is entirely controlled by company editors—we can’t edit pages on About.com or Microsoft.com.

#150 Comment By Minnesota Attorney On January 7, 2009 @ 4:06 pm

But if you are beating out your competitors with wiki whack, and they are competing with you, aren’t you using Wikipedia to beat yourself?

#151 Comment By Minnesota Attorney On January 7, 2009 @ 4:10 pm

However, without Wikipedia being “heavily monitored,” it would be useless sight full of spam.

#152 Comment By Minnesota Attorney On January 7, 2009 @ 4:13 pm

Are you wondering whether your site was penalized by Google because you created a link to it from Wikipedia? If so, I doubt that is the reason Google penalized you.

#153 Comment By free tax filing On January 7, 2009 @ 5:04 pm

Definitely worth a try. Thanks.

#154 Comment By Zune Cases On January 8, 2009 @ 8:59 am

Awesome post good work! This is worth trying!

#155 Comment By beauty salon equipment On January 9, 2009 @ 11:31 am

Thank for advice. It is definitely wort to try. I am getting on to it.

Till

#156 Comment By Lorna On January 9, 2009 @ 12:51 pm

I LOVE IT. This strategy totally works. Thanks!

#157 Comment By Scoville Scale On January 9, 2009 @ 7:20 pm

I agree. Why should Wikipedia - who blocks all link juice going out - get link juice going back in to them? They’re already a great resource that millions of people go to for all sorts of knowledge, so why should they get the top 1-2 results for half the Google searches out there?

#158 Comment By aniroy1986 On January 9, 2009 @ 9:38 pm

its reall blue hat seo :)

#159 Comment By Metaspring On January 9, 2009 @ 10:17 pm

Thanks for that explanation.

#160 Comment By Metaspring On January 9, 2009 @ 10:18 pm

Thanks for sharing ‘insider information’ :)

#161 Comment By Metaspring On January 9, 2009 @ 10:22 pm

Here is the 161st comment in this post; to wish you a very happy and successful new year.

#162 Comment By Acid reflux and diet On January 10, 2009 @ 12:00 am

Hi friends, nice to meet you. Thank for your sharing article.

#163 Comment By cms On January 11, 2009 @ 5:10 am

Metaspring, now 163. But the quantity does not mean quality

#164 Comment By beauty salon equipment On January 11, 2009 @ 10:46 am

@Metaspring, I agree with you. Quantity does not mean quality but it is some kind of measure.
Happy new year to you too.

#165 Comment By Minnesota Attorney On January 12, 2009 @ 11:52 pm

James, you write that “It is known that spamming wikipedia will put your site in a blacklist . . . .” Can you site any authoritative source for this? I don’t believe this is true.

#166 Comment By Minnesota Attorney On January 12, 2009 @ 11:53 pm

Are you saying your ranking improved by spamming Wikipedia with links to your site?

#167 Comment By Minnesota Attorney On January 12, 2009 @ 11:58 pm

Brad, what’s so interesting about it? Can you give us the bullet points?

#168 Comment By Article Submission On January 13, 2009 @ 10:29 am

Amazing, I wonder how effective Wikipedia really is if this is how simple it is to enter anything you want.

#169 Comment By Wii On January 13, 2009 @ 10:35 am

Great advicce. I have been sat around 6th for a particular search term for a long time now and am hoping my renewed link building campaign is going to create a chance to leapfrog my competition into the top 3.

#170 Comment By Tim On January 13, 2009 @ 5:50 pm

I think this tactic is probably dark blue hat, but given my priority is to be above wiki then i will definitely give it a go.

#171 Comment By game-girl On January 14, 2009 @ 4:34 am

Simplicity and great effectiveness of it are evidently seen.

#172 Comment By Paweł Zinkiewicz On January 14, 2009 @ 8:22 am

Eli my men, where are you? I’m so waiting for another post from you. SEO Empire Part 2, pretty please?

#173 Comment By Genel kultur On January 14, 2009 @ 8:22 pm

Wiki = nofollow ;)

#174 Comment By LBD On January 16, 2009 @ 7:14 am

Its often that Wikipedia is the highest ranking page, actually to often if you ask me.

I would really enjoy if google would pay less attention to sites lik wikipedia.

#175 Comment By oknazzz On January 16, 2009 @ 12:57 pm

very interesting

#176 Comment By Sausage Recipes On January 16, 2009 @ 7:34 pm

Shoemoney? and John Chow? Those guys are the ones making the big bux with blogging, and off course other online ventures as well.

As far as the wiki overthrowing, man… it seems really hard to do, hehe.

#177 Comment By PHP Developer On January 19, 2009 @ 8:55 am

Hi there,

Does anyone have any befor and after examples?

Or has anyone done this yest?

Cheers

D

#178 Comment By Verden Bedste On January 20, 2009 @ 6:18 am

I also use link dignosis to find good links at wikipedia

#179 Comment By Verden Bedste On January 20, 2009 @ 6:19 am

I use linkdiagnosis tool from fire fox…

#180 Comment By recetas de cocina On January 20, 2009 @ 9:41 am

Can’t dropping a link to a wikipedia page get you black listed and maybe even put you into a Google penalty? I’m not sure about this.

#181 Comment By The Blogger Source On January 20, 2009 @ 9:24 pm

I hear the same thing with regards to getting blacklisted.

#182 Comment By game-girl On January 21, 2009 @ 12:07 am

yes,So do I .But I am not sure it is really true.

#183 Comment By Internet Marketing On January 21, 2009 @ 8:42 am

Very amusing article, I enjoyed the read!

#184 Comment By passive income On January 21, 2009 @ 11:30 am

you shouldn’t make fun of Jane. i’m sure she will learn from reading this blog that you can’t get blacklisted for simply suggesting a link in wikipedia is not legit.

#185 Comment By SEO wp ecommerce On January 22, 2009 @ 6:47 am

I have actually been following this advice and I have seen some nice results. I am wondering when Eli is going to give out the secret about overthrowing a .gov or .edu ranking :)

#186 Comment By IT Freelance On January 23, 2009 @ 3:55 am

Its good to read them. To my knowledge, I think “Link Diagnosis” is the best tool which comes with Firefox.

- Dave.

#187 Comment By Typhoon On January 23, 2009 @ 4:48 am

Lolz..

#188 Comment By Property Tax Audit On January 23, 2009 @ 10:58 am

Your article is really worth to read. I Found your sites very interesting!

#189 Comment By Mallorca Immobilien On January 26, 2009 @ 8:09 am

Hello, we have a project in Germany with the keyword LR. We have tried everything possible to be better than wikipedia. Nothing has helped until now! I´ll try your tipps!

#190 Comment By Jericho Properties On January 27, 2009 @ 1:30 pm

Thanks so much for the advices that I found here. keep it up.

#191 Comment By Huggy On January 28, 2009 @ 11:52 pm

As long as you can stand the pain of feeling evil =D

#192 Comment By SEO Preston On January 29, 2009 @ 1:08 pm

WOW that a big statement to make. Wikipedia is one of the most authortiy websites on the internet. It could be possible to overturn the results but very hard.

#193 Comment By Sweaty Palms On January 29, 2009 @ 4:03 pm

Yet another awesome SEO technique. Thanks for this, I just might use it :)

Andy

#194 Comment By Metaspring On January 29, 2009 @ 7:40 pm

Yes quantity does not mean quality but when there is such an overwhelming response it does have to count for something!

#195 Comment By Metaspring On January 29, 2009 @ 7:42 pm

Precisely, there is a very great deal of appreciation for an original and creative tactic here.

#196 Comment By Lassar On January 30, 2009 @ 6:43 pm

Wikipedia links are nofollow ! I do not see the logic in removing the links from wikipedia.

Make no sense at all. And it’s not ethical either.

#197 Comment By Fat Loss For Idiots Reviews On January 31, 2009 @ 2:20 pm

I find that you can easily rank above Wiki by just building a reasonable amount of links to your site. Up until now I never had a problem.

#198 Comment By Law Firm Internet Marketing On February 1, 2009 @ 12:19 pm

It’s always pissed my off that the wiki pages did so well. Yours is an interesting take on how to take care of that issue.

I get the impression that these folks at wiki act like many at dmoz.

#199 Comment By Sally House On February 2, 2009 @ 3:43 am

More and more bluehat goodness. keep it coming.

#200 Comment By Impala Brake Parts On February 2, 2009 @ 7:41 am

The information in your blog is very interesting and excellent. Thankyou for providing valuable information.

#201 Comment By Jerry@Charlotte Gay Real Estate On February 2, 2009 @ 11:13 am

Thanks a lot for the cool information that I found here. It helps me a lot.

#202 Comment By Getting Rid Of Acne On February 2, 2009 @ 1:40 pm

Im just having trouble outranking smaller sites right now, let alone the bigger sites with lots of PR and authority. It is really hard. thanks for the info!

#203 Comment By Ruby Web On February 3, 2009 @ 5:22 am

thank you for sharing these tips with us. I haven’t been using wikipedia much lately, it makes me wonder if I’ve slowed down on my researching??? Hmmm….

Well, another thing I am curious about though regarding wikipedia is, did they finally reach their target of donations? I’ll go check it out don’t worry. ;-)

#204 Comment By Ruby Web On February 3, 2009 @ 5:24 am

Wow, I never thought of that before. thanks Tech SEO.

#205 Comment By Ruby Web On February 3, 2009 @ 5:26 am

Cyrus, why are you spamming this blog with your comments? Rather go comment on other articles if you just want to get on the tc list.

#206 Comment By Setai On February 3, 2009 @ 7:14 am

I wonder how many of commentators read actual post.

#207 Comment By skip hire On February 3, 2009 @ 7:49 am

Wiki - huge site but how much can you believe is fact anyway?

#208 Comment By skip hire On February 3, 2009 @ 7:50 am

Does anyone know anybody who has actually donated to Wiki??? Is anybody out there………..

#209 Comment By Rocket Spanish Reviews On February 3, 2009 @ 4:44 pm

If you do your basic SEO you can probably outrank Wiki 90 times out of a 100.

#210 Comment By cuocthiseo On February 4, 2009 @ 2:37 am

Did anyone have success by this?

#211 Comment By MPU On February 4, 2009 @ 2:54 am

I had. Try it and you´ll see!

#212 Comment By MDP On February 4, 2009 @ 8:14 pm

Interesting concept, but doesn’t Wikipedia nofollow their links?

#213 Comment By Aditya On February 5, 2009 @ 1:55 pm

I pretty confused with this concept. Some people say posting on wikipedia is really good thing to do. It will increase your traffic, but I think wikipedia is nofollow website. any successor yet.

#214 Comment By Jamie Cohen On February 6, 2009 @ 4:33 pm

haha i really like the idea. F’in Wikis are always beating me in the serps and now its time for them to pay for it.

#215 Comment By usmado On February 6, 2009 @ 9:34 pm

it s a very nice place

#216 Comment By Sanjay On February 7, 2009 @ 12:59 am

Another good one article..thanks for posted here.

#217 Comment By Hypnotize On February 7, 2009 @ 2:01 am

Really informative as always Eli. Still waiting on SEO Empire Part 2 :-)

#218 Comment By Celix On February 7, 2009 @ 2:02 am

what a impressive article. last days I didn’ t read post like that. I am now your blog’ s follower thanks for this useful blog. you are now in my bookmarks.

#219 Comment By Goobernutz On February 7, 2009 @ 6:42 am

So is this site dead or what? I’m thinking of dropping it from my RSS reader. What’s the buzz? Tell me what’s a-happenin…

#220 Comment By Vacuum On February 8, 2009 @ 10:41 am

Great post, I am going to have to try it out now. I get so frustrated when Wiki ranks higher than my post.

#221 Comment By Kampanye Damai Pemilu Indonesia 2009 On February 9, 2009 @ 3:17 am

This is the article that I want. This article is very good. This article is very useful for me. Thanks

#222 Comment By Devon Hotels On February 9, 2009 @ 7:42 am

Great old post, what’s happening with more recent posts, all seems a bit quiet on the site?

#223 Comment By Jeff@Charlotte Properties On February 9, 2009 @ 12:37 pm

Thank you very much for sharing a very interesting concept. Keep up the good work.

#224 Comment By Setai On February 9, 2009 @ 5:29 pm

Great post, I am going to have to try it out now.

#225 Comment By Joe On February 9, 2009 @ 6:43 pm

Modifying wikipedia is always a bit of a gamble as depending of the subject there are crazy zealots that would remove even really useful linka.

#226 Comment By MarbleHost.com On February 10, 2009 @ 3:24 am

A Great tatics, it is of utmost importance for the seo.

#227 Comment By Marbl Host On February 10, 2009 @ 11:46 pm

Great article and great idea thanks for sharing

#228 Comment By Y. Steven On February 11, 2009 @ 11:37 am

True i agree with you, we should not offending the newbies. Great articles el

#229 Comment By fx trading On February 12, 2009 @ 11:09 am

Eli, great concept! I’ll try that to improve my rankings.

#230 Comment By Pawan Kumar On February 13, 2009 @ 9:04 am

Realy its good way of getting high renk but we should also consider the objectve of Wikipedia as it is not a profit making organization but if we try not to make profit then it would be very dificult for us as some of us have choosen it as a career.

Anyhow, we should follow the simplycity as the Wikipedea follows and we should try not to advertise much on our website.

#231 Comment By olivia On February 13, 2009 @ 9:12 am

Thank you! my parents have this site “www.maisonporcelaine.com” and sell therefore porcelain. On the french google, they are alywas ranked second. I ll work on it for them! i ll let you know,

Thankyou very much, olivia

#232 Comment By Adaid SEO On February 14, 2009 @ 7:57 pm

Hahaha, I like the style of writing here. No bullshit. Good hints.

#233 Comment By Kieran On February 15, 2009 @ 9:30 am

This is some good advice. The SERP pages are being squeezed more and more with properties like Wiki, Squidoo, Hub pages etc ..

#234 Comment By Kampanye Pemilu Indonesia 2009 On February 16, 2009 @ 4:44 am

Thanks for this nice advice..i wanna try this hint to “fight” in “kampanye damai pemilu indonesia 2009″

#235 Comment By rider On February 16, 2009 @ 7:57 am

Great advice thanks, although is number 2 really that different to number 1?

#236 Comment By Jeff@SEM Experts On February 16, 2009 @ 9:54 am

Thank you so much for the pieces of advices. Keep posting!

#237 Comment By Ebook Marketing On February 16, 2009 @ 11:58 am

Great advices! thanks a lot for sharing!

#238 Comment By oyun turkiye On February 16, 2009 @ 1:16 pm

thanks. this is important things.

#239 Comment By Make Money On Internet On February 18, 2009 @ 5:14 am

This article is like a mine giving gold for free, I mean you give away all that cool SEO advise for free. Hats off man!!

#240 Comment By Blogging Tips On February 18, 2009 @ 6:51 am

That needs a bit of work but will pay off really well.

#241 Comment By JustinZero On February 18, 2009 @ 9:22 am

I just wanted to say that you are a total douche nozzle. Your science is flawed! half the twisted shit you try to pull off as SEO doesn’t even fucking work!

nah… I’m just kidding ;)

You are a fucking GENIUS and an inspiration dude…for real

#242 Comment By Tom On February 19, 2009 @ 4:28 pm

Love the comments on here, although I didn’t see an answer to the question about whether there’s any point in knocking out links in wikipedia if they are nofollow anyway?

#243 Comment By SEO Agentur On February 20, 2009 @ 1:57 am

Why have you stopped writing in you blog? You are one the most popular SEO Blog in the world. I find it´s a pity!

#244 Comment By Fahrrad On February 20, 2009 @ 6:19 pm

Thank you for the tip, was completely of my opinion.

#245 Comment By Review your web host get a backlink On February 21, 2009 @ 4:11 pm

This in unethical.
However the competitor is probably loading his links into wikipedia 1 day at a time and so . . . .

Would be espacially useful if you had a site on page 2 and this method got you onto page 1

#246 Comment By Angela On February 21, 2009 @ 8:14 pm

So apparently, adding links to Wikipedia didn’t get you banned. That would be ridiculous, as that would discourage ANY site from being in a Wikipedia entry. If no one wanted their site in a Wikipedia entry, Wikipedia would crash and burn, as they would no longer be seen as having thorough information as many of the links in Wikipedia are very relevant to the entry.

[5] Angela from Aberdeen

[6] Backlinks

#247 Comment By Eiweiß On February 23, 2009 @ 2:08 am

In fact your article and opinions are very right. But in the reality it´s more than difficult to succeed in overthrowing a wiki result.
I think Wikipedia has such a trust level that it´s quite impossible for a commercial website to top it!

#248 Comment By Notebooks günstig On February 23, 2009 @ 3:41 am

I am exactly the same opinion. It´s really a pity that he doesn´t write anymore in the blog.

#249 Comment By seo On February 23, 2009 @ 4:02 am

Nice information mate, thank you for sharing.

#250 Comment By sem On February 23, 2009 @ 4:04 am

True i agree with you, great info.

#251 Comment By Digital Music Distribution On February 23, 2009 @ 3:13 pm

Nice article.

#252 Comment By Carport On February 24, 2009 @ 7:59 am

A good information, maybe possible for some nisches keywords.

#253 Comment By Zuerich On February 26, 2009 @ 4:41 am

I try to overthrow Zürich (switzerland´s capital) with my website :) It´s almost impossible!

#254 Comment By andymayhem On February 26, 2009 @ 11:04 am

great advice, i think il look into this 2morrow. one of my niche competitors is referenced on that damn site

#255 Comment By liveshopping On February 27, 2009 @ 4:06 pm

great tactic, thanks for sharing!

#256 Comment By Matt R On February 28, 2009 @ 3:08 pm

is this method still working. I’ve tried it a couple of times now with no success.

#257 Comment By Mr. Mobotix On March 2, 2009 @ 4:34 am

Guys - No joke!

Actually wikepedia itself gets banned every single time it links to anything internal as well as external! Last time I linked to them also all of my competitors websites were immediately promoted to No1 positions on Google and Yahoo! for all their top key-words.

Something really dodgy is going on with that domain!!!

#258 Comment By Willy On March 2, 2009 @ 7:52 am

How’s that help to overtake the Wikipedia SEO?
When typing SEO in Google?

#259 Comment By David On March 2, 2009 @ 11:37 am

Man, some of the people commenting on this blog must have had pretty mean parents when it comes to dishing out names.

Have you not tried bombing in a load of gutter spam links into a wikipage? It’s likely to make it rank better, but sometimes pumping some bilge in will tank a site.

#260 Comment By Blockbuster New Releases On March 3, 2009 @ 8:42 am

That’s awesome.

I have had this problem in the past and just found that consistent link building beat it eventually…. But not in 3 days.

I have also never edited a wikipedia page but should start doing that.

#261 Comment By JurnalSEM On March 5, 2009 @ 2:46 am

I do think that (theoretically) the internal linking done in Wikipedia become the major contributions to its ranking in SERP, plus its domain’s age. These 2 factors is what we always called “domain authority” factor.

#262 Comment By buddy On March 5, 2009 @ 12:03 pm

I think it can but im not certain.

#263 Comment By Dennis Foreman On March 5, 2009 @ 3:18 pm

Nice SEO trick to know, unethical, but nice :-)

I guess we will shortly see the complete rejection of wikipedia as this kind of damage begins to take its toll on the integrity of the site.

It is a pity really.

Dennis Foreman

#264 Comment By Chef Jackets Dallas On March 5, 2009 @ 3:19 pm

Nice SEO trick to know, unethical, but nice :-)

I guess we will shortly see the complete rejection of wikipedia as this kind of damage begins to take its toll on the integrity of the site.

It is a pity really.

Dennis Foreman

#265 Comment By SeoChildren On March 6, 2009 @ 12:04 am

Best idea! good Seo trick !

#266 Comment By forex faculty On March 7, 2009 @ 8:44 am

lol.. wicked stuff

#267 Comment By Setai On March 8, 2009 @ 8:31 pm

Wiki Bowling, lol.

#268 Comment By Online Shopping On March 9, 2009 @ 1:18 am

This is seriously of great help! Why didn’t I thought of them in the beggining? I am wondering, are these what you have thought or you consolidate from elsewhere?Great one!

#269 Comment By Rent boats in Kiev On March 9, 2009 @ 8:12 am

Great article, hard to though. Dy the way, Eli, when will you post something new for us?))

#270 Comment By Online Fashion Shopping On March 10, 2009 @ 5:48 am

I guess a lot of people will face this problem. Thanks for the useful solution.

#271 Comment By immobilien in mallorca On March 10, 2009 @ 8:15 am

Verny nice and useful. Thanks for that

#272 Comment By Claire On March 11, 2009 @ 2:12 am

It all depends what you are searching for. Last year our Web Design site went above Wikipedia for a short term for the keyword ‘web design’, which we were absolutely fanatic about. But then it dropped. It does need a lot of search engine optimisation work to get it there, an even more seo to keep it there!

#273 Comment By Zillioner On March 12, 2009 @ 6:37 am

Very good post, thanks.

#274 Comment By Bier On March 13, 2009 @ 3:14 pm

Well I don´t think it´s possible to overthrow a wikipedia result.

#275 Comment By Online Marketing Blog On March 13, 2009 @ 10:37 pm

IT is possible to overthrow a wikipedia result with enough hard work. It has been done many times before.

#276 Comment By Minnesota Attorney On March 15, 2009 @ 8:40 am

Is there seriously a Wikipedia blacklist that is shared with Google? I’ve never heard of this.

#277 Comment By Minnesota Attorney On March 15, 2009 @ 8:41 am

The suggestion you are referring to is to edit the Wikipedia pages and remove the links.

#278 Comment By Minnesota Attorney On March 15, 2009 @ 8:43 am

I didn’t see anything in the Wikipedia Annual Report of interest to this topic but it does have some interesting information—facts you wouldn’t expect for Wikipedia. People can check it out here if they want: [7] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annual_report

#279 Comment By Jeet On March 16, 2009 @ 9:47 am

I can see that this technique will totally work. Wikipedia is often a trouble for people optimizing celebrity fan sites.

I am not entirely sure about removing the links from wikipedia pages, what if just the anchor text is change to include ‘Wikipedia Entry for so-and-so-topic’?

#280 Comment By bleuken On March 17, 2009 @ 3:44 am

I never thought that it will be possible to overthrow such “giant foe” on search engines. it seems impossible but I will try your suggestion and get back here if what will be the result. But I guess I will really gone to a “tons of pain” before I could really overthrown one.

#281 Comment By Cheap Checks On March 17, 2009 @ 10:44 am

Great tip Melanie! That’s the best comment so far. I’m going to try it today and see how it works.

[8] personal checks

#282 Comment By Cheap Checks On March 17, 2009 @ 10:46 am

How many of you have overthrown Wikipedia for your results? I’m interested to know how effective this is….

#283 Comment By seo denver On March 18, 2009 @ 1:23 pm

Very creative technique, Eli. One thing to keep in mind also are pages from other language sources. Target that too.

#284 Comment By Ed Hardy clothing On March 19, 2009 @ 11:53 am

It’s not just “little deceptive”. It’s a real Blue Hat SEO (though some of the tips of this page I’d call black hat rather)

#285 Comment By dacm On March 20, 2009 @ 7:38 am

Awesome idea! Takes a lot of work and patience though. One page I’d like to beat has over 500 links from other wikipedia pages. Could take me a while..

#286 Comment By Smith On March 20, 2009 @ 12:24 pm

Hey

it’s quite interesting one once i saw the title, And you have given an awesome tips inside it, Such a pleasure to read this blog. :D Thanks a lot mate, I really wanna try this out, If i meet any problem or doubts, I’ll let you know here mate.

Thanks :D

#287 Comment By Georgia Drug Rehab On March 20, 2009 @ 2:12 pm

Great article. That is a great idea. I tried that and it helped me a lot on my drug rehab sites. Thanks a lot.

#288 Comment By Gifts for Dad On March 20, 2009 @ 11:00 pm

nice posting,very resourceful.Thank you for shearing

#289 Comment By Engineering Seminar Topics On March 21, 2009 @ 3:12 am

interesting !

Thank You For Amazing Information

I Stumbled

#290 Comment By Kai Lo On March 21, 2009 @ 9:52 pm

Nice post, but shouldn’t bash on newbies asking questions in comments.

#291 Comment By Free Webmaster SEO Tools On March 22, 2009 @ 9:14 pm

Man, this is golden, you should be selling this info!
Thanks

#292 Comment By rufman On March 22, 2009 @ 9:37 pm

Cool! I love this. This post caught my attention because those “wiki” pests rank above me in just about every keyword. I will try to fix this!

#293 Comment By Seo Blog On March 23, 2009 @ 8:54 am

Hey man, Thanks for giving this for free, as free webmaster SEO tools said, you have to sell this useful information.
So that it takes some attention of the people :D lol

#294 Comment By curhat online On March 23, 2009 @ 7:45 pm

awesome information; a good read

#295 Comment By alex On March 25, 2009 @ 6:30 am

Thank you for your sharing.

#296 Comment By Druckerpatronen On March 25, 2009 @ 3:44 pm

nice post, very informative.

#297 Comment By Claire On March 27, 2009 @ 2:30 am

It isn’t too hard to get above Wikipedia, our website has been above it for the term ‘web design’. As you say it does require a lot of work externally, but i would be careful about getting too many links from Wikepedia. It is highly thought of, but i don’t think it is always necessary for good Search Engine Optimisation.

#298 Comment By quick income blueprint review On March 27, 2009 @ 6:35 am

This will come handy in a few niches heh heh

#299 Comment By dimind On March 27, 2009 @ 10:17 am

tnx! Very good post!

#300 Comment By Rob On March 27, 2009 @ 11:24 am

The amount of work being done lately eats up alot of time. I’ll have to get eli a bottle of sailor jerrys and have him finish up a post. =)

#301 Comment By rufman On March 27, 2009 @ 5:10 pm

I am in the process of trying this and so far nothing happening. Will keep you updated!

#302 Comment By alagu sundaram On March 30, 2009 @ 5:49 am

Its really great post to read , Nice one for seo

#303 Comment By Dead Sea Salt On March 31, 2009 @ 2:13 pm

dude, you are good. never thought of that but the method is great. I just hope wikipedia won’t ban too fast for this one.

#304 Comment By Ari Lestariono On April 1, 2009 @ 9:57 am

Interesting article and weird also, anyway nice to drop in and looking forward to hear your new post.Cheers

#305 Comment By Abmahnung erhalten? On April 2, 2009 @ 11:47 am

I guess Google will never let a site ranking better than wikipedia. Is that a problem? Not really as everybody knows that Wikipedia isn´t commercial at all.

#306 Comment By Cottages in Devon On April 3, 2009 @ 12:01 am

Great article… hopefully will help me with a problem I am having at the moment.

#307 Comment By Gry dla Dzieci On April 3, 2009 @ 5:56 am

good post

#308 Comment By HGH On April 7, 2009 @ 9:33 am

good post

#309 Comment By Apple Pie On April 7, 2009 @ 5:28 pm

The “What links here” link at the side of the Wikipedia article lists all of the links from other Wikipedia articles, so it’s better than Yahoo Site Explorer in that respect.

Few of my sites have problems with wikipedia articles though.

#310 Comment By Info Ibu On April 7, 2009 @ 10:21 pm

I learn new insight when I read your article.
I love it and I will come often for more.
Thanks
Info Ibu

#311 Comment By SEO Dude On April 8, 2009 @ 5:54 pm

Is it really okay to remove links from a wiki just for SEO purposes? Maybe I sound polyanna here, but that doesn’t seem okay to me…

Also - What’s with all the spam comments here?

#312 Comment By Sulumits Retsambew On April 9, 2009 @ 6:04 am

Very good post specially for newbie

thanks for writing this

#313 Comment By Madrid On April 10, 2009 @ 1:39 pm

Great post. It never ceases to amaze me how technical seo can be. Great advice

#314 Comment By Deed poll On April 11, 2009 @ 6:20 am

Great I didnt think that you could get over this problem

#315 Comment By andrew the seo company man On April 11, 2009 @ 11:54 pm

excellent article. This could be considered sabotage and it’s scary thought that someone could be doing to your pages also!

#316 Comment By SEO Web Design On April 13, 2009 @ 4:14 am

Hey Eli!!

will you ever write a new post here… kindly let us know.

Is there any other place on www where you are blogging or answering forums aor somethin else..

waiting eagerly for your response..

Sanchi

#317 Comment By Pozycjonowanie Poznan On April 14, 2009 @ 11:45 pm

For a minute there I tought you were serious Mark. I’m glad it was just sarcasm.

#318 Comment By Setai On April 15, 2009 @ 12:54 am

I think it’s almost the same.

#319 Comment By Ruben Zevallos Jr. On April 15, 2009 @ 4:34 am

This post complements what you said at another… I think using both ideas are very good… in one way, you may be have new links from Wikipedia to your pages, but also, why not get some at second level?

#320 Comment By Awxus On April 15, 2009 @ 5:25 am

You explain this quite clearly quite easily possible, It is confusing though, So many of the commentators dropping links to Wiki, That way, you remove the link juice coming into the page you are competing with

#321 Comment By Minnesota Attorney On April 15, 2009 @ 5:55 am

I agree. It’s amazing how technical SEO can be. SEO has become a careful science.

#322 Comment By Laptop Reviews On April 15, 2009 @ 10:11 am

Haha, pretty sneaky but I love your thinking! Please post more often!!

#323 Comment By marc with the divorce lawyer miami On April 15, 2009 @ 1:11 pm

Sneaky tactic, but i would love to know how many hours it took to delete many of its back links from other wiki entries?

#324 Comment By Awxus On April 16, 2009 @ 5:04 am

I can’t comment with url, Any suggestions??

#325 Comment By Mark Debattista On April 16, 2009 @ 7:52 am

It’s possible to rank better than Wikipedia, but it’s very difficult too for the reasons you mentioned above. If you just follow their links and do same it won’t be enough, be imaginative and do better :P

#326 Comment By kdl32w5500 On April 17, 2009 @ 1:03 am

I have just come across this post and have been having the same problem for one of my keywords. I’m going to give your advice a try and post my results in a week.

#327 Comment By internet community On April 17, 2009 @ 5:45 am

Why should I overthrow a wiki result? I mean at least 90% people know that wikipedia is no commercial result. In that case I see no concurrence and no need to lose my precious time in optimization.

#328 Comment By Simon On April 17, 2009 @ 7:48 am

This is a problem a lot of SEO consultants come up against i’m guessing. Any ideas are good ones to achieve a goal.

#329 Comment By Used Tires On April 18, 2009 @ 1:12 am

I gotta give this a try for sure, although the one wikipage that I am trying to over throw the guys handling it seem to be really really attentive to detail, hehe. But its a learn experience I suppose!

#330 Comment By Internet Marketing On April 18, 2009 @ 6:11 am

I actually am interested to know how to get links from Wikipedia. Even if I have placed informative content on the page, Wikipedia does not appear to accept it, because it is a commercial website at last..

#331 Comment By Obsolete Parts Distributor On April 18, 2009 @ 7:07 pm

I guess Google will never let a site ranking better than Wikipedia but you should remove the link juice coming into the page you are competing with, it seemed like a really awesome tool.

#332 Comment By Odzyskiwanie Danych On April 21, 2009 @ 2:52 am

I thought it was the other way around. Great post, thanks.

#333 Comment By mlm training On April 21, 2009 @ 4:02 pm

oh man, you’re a genius…but i’m too scared to do that…

#334 Comment By Submit Article On April 23, 2009 @ 1:33 am

Those were some good tips that I think I could add to my link building arsenal :)

I wonder how come those ideas come to your mind!!

#335 Comment By Retsambew Sulumits On April 24, 2009 @ 12:28 am

The singular and plural keyword targeting was a major area I was having problem with but your post clearly explains how to do the right kind of optimization.

#336 Comment By John On April 27, 2009 @ 12:14 pm

Ahhhhhh. Got it! I, too, was having problems with the singular and plural as well. Thank you!

#337 Comment By amy@talent website On April 27, 2009 @ 8:46 pm

Nice tips. I will go to this one by one I was doing some experiments on my end to topple wiki. Good thing I read your article. 2 thumbs up to you.

#338 Comment By Mobile Broadband On April 30, 2009 @ 10:36 pm

All the tips which you have given are very usefull for me.

#339 Comment By Trivia Questions On May 1, 2009 @ 4:05 am

That’s just nasty! Thanks for the tips.

#340 Comment By Secret On May 4, 2009 @ 8:33 am

Wonderful article , thanks ! tips great , very help me !

#341 Comment By Discount Headstones On May 4, 2009 @ 8:07 pm

Interesting concept. I have found the “wiki patrol” is active in some areas and asleep at the wheel in other places.

It has been interesting to read the discussion and various ideas.

[9] Granite Headstones

#342 Comment By Chicago Realtor On May 5, 2009 @ 12:53 pm

Thanks for all the tips, this is a great article, I enjoyed reading and learned a lot from it!

#343 Comment By TOEIC 対策 On May 6, 2009 @ 10:35 pm

I want to learn more about wikipedia’s way of the inner linking.

#344 Comment By Tom@Song Words On May 7, 2009 @ 3:14 pm

Great tutorial :-) often just making the internal link juice a little less helps a much in ass kicking Wikipedia :-D .

#345 Comment By Nachhilfe On May 10, 2009 @ 2:56 am

We have tried to get a better place than wikipedia and were successfull, unfortunately only for 3 weeks. Now we are at least 3 positions under wiki.

#346 Comment By Cheltenham hotels On May 12, 2009 @ 8:09 am

Luckily we don’t have to contend with wikipedia for any keywords we are targeting, but if the menace starts showing up, will use some of the ideas to knock ‘em out!

#347 Comment By Alex On May 12, 2009 @ 1:56 pm

I know this is old, but that was an awesome post. It’s just got so many good in it.

Oh, and your writing style is great.

#348 Comment By søgemaskineoptimering On May 16, 2009 @ 8:10 am

Sorry for “bumping” the thread. Just wanted to say thank you for some awesomeness :)

More goodies plz!! ;)

#349 Comment By sports chat On May 17, 2009 @ 6:21 pm

I didn’t know that there’s a way to throw off wiki… thanks for sharing.

#350 Comment By Low Book Sales On May 19, 2009 @ 11:21 am

This is is brilliant, can’t believe I didn’t think about this in the past. It makes sense that if you take away all of the interlinking from irrelevant pages and match links on blogs and forums pointing back that it will potentially push your link up in the results above the Wiki result. Obviously it isn’t a guarantee, but it’s a way to combat the obvious domination of Wiki in the Google results. Nice gem!

#351 Comment By googlecashkit On May 21, 2009 @ 11:52 am

I find that you can easily rank above Wiki by just building a reasonable amount of links to your site. Up until now I never had a problem.

#352 Comment By dvds to ipod On May 22, 2009 @ 12:57 am

“I find that you can easily rank above Wiki by just building a reasonable amount of links to your site. Up until now I never had a problem. ”

Well sure you can. You can rank above anyone if you just build a “reasonable” amount of backlinks.

#353 Comment By Pozycjonowanie stron On May 25, 2009 @ 4:01 am

I have tried Your method but wikipedia is still TOP1

#354 Comment By yarim ezgi On May 25, 2009 @ 1:22 pm

i will try

#355 Comment By SEO Review & Rating Engine On May 25, 2009 @ 3:19 pm

This is almost war methods you are suggesting :-)

#356 Comment By Sondy On May 26, 2009 @ 4:40 am

I guess a lot off editors from wiki dont like this. You must be sure not to remove links that really need to be there. Else they will just put them back.

#357 Comment By Surveys4Checks On May 28, 2009 @ 8:49 am

I am behind wiki and It doesn’t seem to bother me. People read up on it, and go the next result. Wiki is great but people want more content that is original, everyone has seen a wiki page.

[10] Surveys4checks

#358 Comment By lida fx15 gazeteler biber hapı noraseo saat On May 28, 2009 @ 3:03 pm

I’m fighting with wikipedi for a lot of word.but it’s hard.that wikipedia son of the google.

#359 Comment By work at home On June 5, 2009 @ 4:45 pm

Thanks for the Wikipedia tip. Real useful for my linking structure.

#360 Comment By TMJ On June 8, 2009 @ 2:21 am

At present the only way I am trying to outrank my competitors is analysing their links, is that a good way ?

#361 Comment By fat burning pills On June 8, 2009 @ 6:58 pm

How come addding links to wikipedia not get you baned. I dont beleive that.

#362 Comment By Bv Cures On June 9, 2009 @ 5:53 am

As per my experience, you cannot beat an existing website by just analysing their links. Because there are certain factors such as domain age which is highly unmodifiable. So the best approach would be to build multiple long tail websites and try to rank them rather than just trying all your SEO efforts on one site only.

#363 Comment By Medifast Shakes Recipes On June 9, 2009 @ 11:30 pm

I think content will always be king. Much easier to rank for too!

#364 Comment By Tower On June 10, 2009 @ 5:01 am

Those first few comments were surely pretty scary, I thought id have to redo all my seo.

#365 Comment By Patricia On June 10, 2009 @ 11:25 pm

I hope your idea will work but there is always danger of being penalized by Google.

#366 Comment By Graphic Design Melbourne On June 12, 2009 @ 3:38 am

Although this is a very informative post I don’t think I would dare follow your method. Yes, people are saying that it is OK but…

#367 Comment By Bv Cures On June 13, 2009 @ 3:56 am

I partly agree with you in this regard(but don’t agree 100%)
the reason for this is that i believe google has given a HIGH MANUAL PRIORITY ADVANTAGE to sites like wikipedia, about.com , etc.

#368 Comment By Bv Cures On June 13, 2009 @ 3:58 am

I have a couple sites with outbound links to wikipedia but haven’t got banned. so i feel your thinking is wrong!

#369 Comment By Bv Cures On June 13, 2009 @ 4:01 am

“Is the ban you receive permanent or a sandbox type thing to give the editing process time to occur?”
i don’t understand why your site will get into sandbox or banned by getting a link from wikipedia. i had a website on “online university information” and got a couple of links from wikipedia for a short period of time. I experienced an increase in SERP during that period. but as my links were removed by editors later, i soon noticed a fall in my SERPS.

#370 Comment By Bv Cures On June 13, 2009 @ 4:03 am

this is what i have been trying to say in my previous comments. infact getting a link from wikipedia is very beneficial despite it being a no-follow.

#371 Comment By Bv Cures On June 13, 2009 @ 4:07 am

“and managed to replace maybe 60 or 70 links that pointed to my competitor.”
but how on earth could you get those links to your commentator removed. it would be nice if you post the method of removing links!!! ;-)

#372 Comment By Bv Cures On June 13, 2009 @ 4:12 am

“I’ll take that one step further. Start by spamming the crap out of the
Wikipedia page in question with internal Wiki links — add links to as
many Wikipedia pages as quickly as you can, they should be barely relevant.

In my experience, adding a huge volume of internal links all at once can
trip a Google filter and make the page disappear from the SERP (at least
for a little while).

Then in a day or so you can go back (obviously from a different
IP/account) and remove all those links PLUS many of the original legit
links in the name of cleaning up after “the spammer”. Just make sure you
don’t look too obvious. ”

i found this on [11] http://www.nabble.com/How-to-sabotage-Wikipedia,-for-SEO-spammers-td20702972.html

#373 Comment By Bv Cures On June 13, 2009 @ 4:17 am

sorry, i didn’t see that this comment was infact first posted here below. so moderator plz remove my previous comment.

#374 Comment By Bv Cures On June 13, 2009 @ 4:23 am

I actually believe in what you say. I do think wikipedia has been given a manual priority benefit by the google administrators.

#375 Comment By Bv Cures On June 13, 2009 @ 4:30 am

i dont think this is feasible because to overthrow a wikipedia page using you method would demand changing the specific wikipedia page TITLE which is not possible easily.

#376 Comment By Bv Cures On June 13, 2009 @ 4:33 am

This is same as spying on competetors backlinks. According to me, nothing special is written in that article at togaac.com!

#377 Comment By Bv Cures On June 13, 2009 @ 4:36 am

To Tracy walker,
This is bluehat seo, and if you are not comfortable with it, then just move on to another blog on whitehat seo!

#378 Comment By Bv Cures On June 13, 2009 @ 4:44 am

Most probably you didn’t put a “reason for edit”, so they were all restored back, or that you removed links which were apt to be linked from on those pages!

#379 Comment By Bv Cures On June 13, 2009 @ 4:47 am

As you may read in my previous comments, i don’t think that getting a link from wikipedia is harmful. infact its very beneficial and helps in increasing the SERPS of your site!

#380 Comment By Bv Cures On June 13, 2009 @ 4:51 am

“meaninglessly large strings of zeroes pile up behind a nine in various bank accounts….”
this is a very funny & intelligent expression of what Eli earns!

#381 Comment By Bv Cures On June 13, 2009 @ 4:53 am

FYI: all external wikipedia links are now no-follow.

#382 Comment By Bv Cures On June 13, 2009 @ 4:56 am

All links to internal pages in wikipedia is dofollow. only external links get a nofollow.

#383 Comment By Bv Cures On June 13, 2009 @ 4:59 am

“Modifying wikipedia is always a bit of a gamble as depending of the subject there are crazy zealots that would remove even really useful linka. ”
I believe this to be the practical truth Joe!

#384 Comment By Bv Cures On June 13, 2009 @ 5:01 am

So far I feel that this is one of the best posts by Eli.
BTW I enjoyed reading the whole post, as well as replying to other’s comments.

#385 Comment By Søgemaskineoptimering On June 14, 2009 @ 2:26 pm

Interesting advise - But external wikipedia links are now no-follow right??

#386 Comment By Joe On June 14, 2009 @ 10:30 pm

WOW! Genius. Going to try this later today.

#387 Comment By Tower On June 14, 2009 @ 11:58 pm

Wikipedia external links ARE no-follow.

#388 Comment By Marky On June 15, 2009 @ 2:05 pm

I think its not a big deal, you can easly get rid of it

#389 Comment By ipod touch microphone On June 15, 2009 @ 2:56 pm

is this work? did someone had try his bluehat strategy? :)

But i like this tips, i would try

Nice Info

Thanks

#390 Comment By Ferienwohnungen On June 16, 2009 @ 11:50 pm

It´s a good artcle, but not really realisable. Especially because Google is now coming with its own info service.

#391 Comment By billig helsekost On June 17, 2009 @ 6:01 am

The Wikipedia technique actually works. Althought its very likely to be more complicated in my opinion. But never the less they technique works.

Frederik

#392 Comment By cute rain boots On June 17, 2009 @ 11:15 am

To my opinion, I don’t think we should spam websites such as Wikipedia. I think those websites should remain as close as possible to an educational reference… It would be sad to see it filled with junk, don’t you think?

#393 Comment By Training Courses On June 18, 2009 @ 1:38 am

I wasnt aware this was even possible, Does this still work do yuo know or have they wised up?

#394 Comment By Naples Florida Lawn Service On June 18, 2009 @ 11:25 pm

Wikipedia doesn’t really have much of a way to combat this as that is kind of the whole point of the website. Good idea!

#395 Comment By Steve On June 19, 2009 @ 7:03 am

I never thought about using Wiki articles in this way. I don’t think I will ever try fighting for a keyword as sought after as Clinton, but this technique might come in handy sometime.

#396 Comment By Insurance On June 19, 2009 @ 2:56 pm

Jeeze - great article. I must admit, I do like the comical was it is written too - very refreshing.

#397 Comment By David Poll On June 20, 2009 @ 12:30 pm

nice article
[12] gold secrets

#398 Comment By Martin On June 21, 2009 @ 12:12 am

Ok , I read this article now three times and i enjoyed it each time and got something new i think i need to read it more and put it in practise ..let us see

#399 Comment By windows tweaks On June 21, 2009 @ 7:44 am

1st read - fell of my chair
2nd read - laughing alot
3rd read - now it makes sense

#400 Comment By Jasper On June 22, 2009 @ 4:47 am

Wow this post is old but people are still responding. I dind’t go through all the comments but has anybody experienced somebody adding the references you’ve deleted? Also what kind of reason should you be using to allow for the removal of those bitches?” title=”Long Island Basements”>

#401 Comment By Joe On June 22, 2009 @ 8:17 pm

I really love this dinosaur.

#402 Comment By Jean Relation On June 23, 2009 @ 1:41 am

Really nice article, I didn’t know about this but it is a great idea to increase the visit of your internet webpage.

I will try today and I gonna see. Hope that it will work for me too…

#403 Comment By Espanja On June 23, 2009 @ 6:45 am

Thank for advice. This could be worth trying…

#404 Comment By Mike - Musical Instruments On June 24, 2009 @ 11:31 am

Eliminating links from a wiki article would be way too hard to do without being caught. What good reasons can you possibly have to remove a valid reference?

#405 Comment By pheromones On June 24, 2009 @ 9:53 pm

Looks like alot of work. Might be worth the effort.

#406 Comment By African shea butter On June 26, 2009 @ 6:00 am

Man wiki is the final frontier. If one can really do that then you are in the captain seat :)

#407 Comment By SEO outsource solutions On June 26, 2009 @ 1:18 pm

Wikipedia is such a dinosaur… it’s great when you finally overthrow a result!

#408 Comment By Lose 40 Pounds weeks On June 28, 2009 @ 10:04 pm

Looks like a lot of work maybe I will give it a try for my weight loss blog

#409 Comment By Fastest Way to Lose Weight On June 28, 2009 @ 10:06 pm

I read this article now couple times, really good info thanks

#410 Comment By php strftime On July 1, 2009 @ 12:18 am

now that’s something smart. I’m sure to give it a try to try n get better than Wikipedia.. Here i cm! :)

#411 Comment By Hair Gel private label On July 2, 2009 @ 3:17 am

It’s not that easy as it sounds but for sure it can be done with the right amount of backlinks and correct ancor test. But maintaining it is another story.

#412 Comment By Best Registry Cleaner On July 2, 2009 @ 8:22 pm

I wonder why some sites of mine actually outrank wikipedia….you CAN outrank WP in some cases. Just be confident and spam blogs with li..uhm i man work on your backlinks :)

#413 Comment By Bertucci On July 3, 2009 @ 11:08 am

This is almost war methods you are suggesting

#414 Comment By home remedies On July 4, 2009 @ 10:32 pm

Looks like alot of work. Might be worth the effort.

#415 Comment By Internet Marketing Company On July 5, 2009 @ 12:31 am

Rome is not built in a day, it takes effort and work to overcome it. Do this right and you will get there.

#416 Comment By Spielzeug On July 5, 2009 @ 5:51 am

Thx for the nice article!
I enjoyed reading it. Looks like a lot of work but i think it will show success.

#417 Comment By Ubieranki On July 5, 2009 @ 9:46 am

I must try this in next week. A lot of work must be done…

#418 Comment By Free Sample Queen On July 5, 2009 @ 3:18 pm

I stumbled across this blog by accident and fell instantly in love. I think that it is impossible to climb high in the serps as a white hatter and being a black hatter is risky even if you know what you’re doing. We are all a bit blue hat. :)

#419 Comment By Minnesota Attorney On July 6, 2009 @ 4:17 pm

These ideas will affect the rank of Wikipedia results, but some Wikipedia pages are so strong that even these methods will not uproot them.

#420 Comment By Grand Incentives On July 6, 2009 @ 9:28 pm

could be a little tough keeping the editors from seeing what your doing, but a good article.

#421 Comment By seo87 On July 7, 2009 @ 3:21 am

Nice article by you definitely I’ll give it a try for our blog.

#422 Comment By seo87 On July 7, 2009 @ 3:28 am

Ya i have some confusion and i do not understand about bluehat seo. That time this catagery struggling for a great position so i watch it.

#423 Comment By seo87 On July 7, 2009 @ 3:30 am

It simple but Are you thier?

#424 Comment By seo87 On July 7, 2009 @ 3:32 am

That is bad bad and i think u are doing black hat seo.

#425 Comment By seo87 On July 7, 2009 @ 3:33 am

You are right detail…..

#426 Comment By seo87 On July 7, 2009 @ 3:36 am

You are right but if any information is wrong so anybuddy deleted it.

#427 Comment By seo87 On July 7, 2009 @ 3:47 am

Ya i agree with you and i think this blog give us some new information..

#428 Comment By US Personals On July 7, 2009 @ 5:56 am

These days I think it would be hard to over throw a wiki result.

#429 Comment By Online Freerolls On July 7, 2009 @ 6:10 am

Has anyone tried this recently?

#430 Comment By Mano On July 7, 2009 @ 2:11 pm

An interesting technique. I don´t know if it will always work, but nevertheless it´s something to remember. You never know enough.

#431 Comment By Massage Recliner Chair On July 12, 2009 @ 9:30 pm

Damn, this is some great information for us, I’ve been trying to get over the Wikipedia hump for a while now…

#432 Comment By Massage Recliner Chair On July 12, 2009 @ 9:30 pm

Whoops, screwed up the URL.

#433 Comment By FREE Pc Software - Freeware On July 15, 2009 @ 12:47 pm

some of their methods tstand their ground, it takes much more effort to over come this. Trust me…

[13] Free Pc Freeware

#434 Comment By Nextlevel seo On July 15, 2009 @ 3:14 pm

The amount of time you have to use depend on keyword, and the numbers of references.

#435 Comment By abe On July 17, 2009 @ 11:37 am

I have a hard time believing that the editors would not catch it.

#436 Comment By mike teckel On July 19, 2009 @ 3:34 am

very nice article. thanks for the good tips!

#437 Comment By Wajdan On July 20, 2009 @ 8:07 am

A google technique i found here. May live long SEO

#438 Comment By Eee PC Drivers On July 21, 2009 @ 2:16 am

I think in SEO we should just consider staying with one keyword at a time. Dont try to do SEO for too may keywords, that will not give you good results.

#439 Comment By sports trivia On July 21, 2009 @ 11:26 am

Anything is doable with the right time commitment, but Wikipedia pages are so strong (as mentioned by other commenters here) that if you’re going to do this, you’d better be committed to putting in lots of time. Whether that time invested is worth it or not depends on the search term.

#440 Comment By Seo konsulent On July 23, 2009 @ 7:55 am

I totally agree on this matter, it is hard to beat Wikipedias but possible. But is the effort worth the while? I think that is the real question.

#441 Comment By Eily Tomas On July 23, 2009 @ 11:13 pm

I see no reason why a site should be instantly banned from receiving a link from Wikipedia? If that was the case I’d be adding links from Wikipedia to all my competitors immediately.

[14] Dazzle White

#442 Comment By Underwater Digital Cameras On July 24, 2009 @ 6:27 pm

Thanks 4 the infrmatn….But it seems like hard wrk 2 me…tanx!

#443 Comment By SlxlS On July 25, 2009 @ 6:36 pm

I’m glad that Wikipedia isn’t threatening any of my websites serps currently, but if it starts I’ll surely use your methods to knock them back down.

#444 Comment By shuaunjudy On July 26, 2009 @ 6:00 am

WoW! Those first few comments are super funny.

#445 Comment By Alaskan Cruises On July 27, 2009 @ 12:09 pm

it is very hard to overthrow a wiki page.

#446 Comment By Frank Jones On July 27, 2009 @ 12:40 pm

This is a great strategy! I will be testing it out very soon!

[15] how to get a girl to like you

#447 Comment By LR On July 28, 2009 @ 10:11 am

Thanks for the steps. I ever wondered why my Site ranks after the wiki site, but now i moved infront of it.

Best regards

Manu

#448 Comment By Find Personal Injury Lawyer On July 28, 2009 @ 1:49 pm

Great information! Motivates one to know that we are able to compete with such a high ranking website. Thanks for the info!

#449 Comment By diarrhea On July 29, 2009 @ 12:50 pm

I’m glad that Wikipedia isn’t threatening any of my websites serps currently, but if it starts I’ll surely use your methods to knock them back down.

#450 Comment By Brendan On July 30, 2009 @ 2:07 pm

With being fairly new to linking,it’s good to get info like this. Thank you

#451 Comment By Henderson Nevada On July 30, 2009 @ 8:08 pm

I could see this working in a small niche, but the reality is you are investing a lot of effort into bumping one site. And as people search for things they become of Wiki and get a sort of banner blindness to it. Obviously it would be better if you could outrank them, but if not then it’s best to utilize your resources where you can don’t you think?

#452 Comment By Medical Assistant Jobs On August 1, 2009 @ 12:35 am

Quite a good post!

#453 Comment By Desi Games On August 2, 2009 @ 2:00 am

This is like “Who Dares - Win” mate. If you dont take these calculated risks, its highly likely that you will remain at the bottom of the table for those results.

#454 Comment By Neck On August 6, 2009 @ 8:12 am

Hey, great post, really well written. You should post more about this. [16] Shoulder

#455 Comment By Mano On August 8, 2009 @ 10:01 am

Yes, it would be a lot of work to do this in a large niche. You probably would be better off building backlinks to your own site instead. Sure, it´s annoying that Wikipedia is about everywhere, but if Wikipedia is gone, someone else will take the place and then you still have to outrank this site.

#456 Comment By Jimmy On August 15, 2009 @ 3:24 pm

I like the idea of using wikipedia against itself.

#457 Comment By Mr bathroom furniture On August 18, 2009 @ 8:08 am

Its good to read them. To my knowledge, I think “Link Diagnosis” is the best tool which comes with Firefox.

[17] - Mr bathroom furniture

#458 Comment By mesothelioma On August 19, 2009 @ 12:00 am

Thanks for all the tips, this is a great article, I enjoyed reading and learned a lot from it!

#459 Comment By stop sweating On August 19, 2009 @ 9:16 am

thanks for the read,nice article
thank you

#460 Comment By Alec On August 20, 2009 @ 1:06 am

Thanks for the solution. It really helps solve the problem.

#461 Comment By SEO Company On August 21, 2009 @ 3:01 am

Very Interesting!

I will try this out for a few of my domains which are in the same condition..

Thanks again!
Radhakrishnan KG

#462 Comment By Lexx On August 21, 2009 @ 9:40 pm

Well, it is kinda war. A lot of those wikipedia articles are CRAP - I have pages on which the article is far superior to its Wikipedia counterpart. Why should I let humanity suffer the disgrace of encountering second rate information in the no. 1 spot; just because Google’s algorithm is CRAP and can’t tell good content from bad any more than it can tell what a web page smells like? ;)

#463 Comment By Steve On August 22, 2009 @ 3:38 am

lol when you explain it like this it makes you think: ‘why haven’t I thought of this’. Good strategy! It may be hard, but you’ll just have to try and see if it works.

#464 Comment By Joanna On August 24, 2009 @ 3:41 am

Hey, thanks for this. I will start to apply this technique to one of my blogs.

#465 Comment By Justin On August 26, 2009 @ 7:14 am

THis is great, I always see wikipedia at the top of almost every search I do…they are a SEO giant and we need all the help we can get!
[18] Hot Dog Carts for Sale

#466 Comment By Jason at Fix Your Credit Score On August 26, 2009 @ 7:43 am

Would like to hear of anyone that has used these steps to their advantage.

#467 Comment By Julian Lockhart On August 26, 2009 @ 11:00 pm

I am posting here because this page links to a Wikipedia page I am trying to dominate. Just kidding. LOL

#468 Comment By NFL predictions On August 27, 2009 @ 3:14 pm

Eli, I always like your posts, also when people talk about them other places. :) I need to visit here more often.

#469 Comment By licitatii On August 28, 2009 @ 12:44 pm

dominating a niche is very hard, you need lots of backlinks.

#470 Comment By check city On August 28, 2009 @ 3:12 pm

Sweet! I love this website!

#471 Comment By zain On August 29, 2009 @ 12:48 am

these are really impressive posts,i think more information should be shared here, i have been thinking about this topic and i would like helping the readers who are interested to have some information.
resveratrol weight loss

#472 Comment By campeden On August 31, 2009 @ 4:31 am

HI
Its very nice posting

#473 Comment By Mebeles On August 31, 2009 @ 11:05 am

Eh this tutorial came a bit late. Because I already over-linked wikipedia for one of my sites keywords. But next time I will definitely use this tutorial. Thans for shearing

#474 Comment By Kevin K On September 1, 2009 @ 3:18 pm

I don’t fully agree with this, you can overtake wikipedia with higher Rank backlinks and more targetted onsite optimisation. Most backlinks to wikipedia are built into webpages and not actually in blogs and forums so editing can be difficult. Overcoming wiki on keywords is hard but do able, just not this way.

[19] Kitesurfing Lessons South East

#475 Comment By SEO Consultant On September 3, 2009 @ 5:57 pm

[20] LOL@Hilary reference. Very informative post.
[21] SEO Consultant

#476 Comment By Funny commercials On September 4, 2009 @ 4:44 am

Hell of a guide .

PS: 475 comments , never remember getting so many on any of my post !

#477 Comment By Faizan On September 4, 2009 @ 1:01 pm

Business Finance Broker Ltd. is a team of dedicated corporate financiers, with over Eighty years combined, Corporate Finance, Banking, and Financial Law experience, making us the ideal choice for your financing needs.

Our highly experienced team’s efforts without doubt are quickly establishing us as the major player in the otherwise highly volatile International Business, Corporate, and Corporate Construction financial marketplace.

At Business Finance Broker, we specialize in arranging Business, Corporate and Commercial Construction finance for our increasing International clientele that now spans twenty-four countries globally.

#478 Comment By Face Skin Care On September 7, 2009 @ 5:40 pm

Cunning little idea. Now I see why you call it blue hat!

I’m not convinced that ranking behind Wiki is so bad though, I do wonder how many people just ignore the Wiki entry and work their way down.

#479 Comment By G-Shock Watch Review On September 7, 2009 @ 8:25 pm

All the tips which you have given are very useful for me.

Thanks mate

#480 Comment By Johan Roode On September 8, 2009 @ 10:14 am

Hi,

Thank you for this tip. Will start with this tonight still. I have this problem with one of my sites and I’m really want to knock it from the 1st page. (and from position 1)

Thank you for sharing this!

#481 Comment By sports odds On September 9, 2009 @ 10:56 am

What is meant by wikipedia’s domain authority and I love the Jane comments sorry everybody picked on you!

#482 Comment By Building A Shed On September 10, 2009 @ 7:33 pm

Thank you for sharing this technique. Wikipedia has been a pain on my side for a while now. Time to change the game.

#483 Comment By Muscle Building On September 11, 2009 @ 1:13 pm

Excellent and clever tips. Wikipedia seems to be everywhere. Thank you for sharing.

#484 Comment By Seo Tips On September 16, 2009 @ 11:43 pm

Great Article but considering its a bit old, this technique may not be needed. As observed by many SEO Experts, once the Caffeine update has been fully integrated into Google’s algorithm. Wikipedia will automatically lose its position on the SERP by an average of 2-7 positions.
Here’s an article describing more about this expected phenomenon : [22] Will Google’s Caffeine disrupt search rankings?

Regards [23] Tech Frog

#485 Comment By cashing at home On September 20, 2009 @ 11:10 pm

Thank you for this great article, it may be a bit old but most of the information is still great for today!♠

#486 Comment By Whey Protein Coupon On September 21, 2009 @ 12:47 am

I hadn’t thought about outranking wikipedia (haven’t had to yet). But this article does give me a few linkbuilding and competitive link intelligence ideas.

#487 Comment By Andrew Green On September 22, 2009 @ 7:16 pm

I am not sure how effective this would be, the keyword I just checked from one of my niche’s has over 2,000 internal links according to the site-explorer tool. That would take me an age to knock out at a rate of 1-2 per day. I do however like the match and exceed step :)

#488 Comment By Professional SEO Company On September 23, 2009 @ 3:39 am

I’ve been able to achieve this on many occasions. Love throwing off Wiki! ;)

#489 Comment By lice treatment On September 23, 2009 @ 1:22 pm

Thanks for the wiki trick.always looking for a way to get through that door…

Wiki is Google’s buddy, if you will. They love each other, and do everything together, so its good enough for me. I also like yahoo site explorer as the link tool. Nice post, thanks!
Sheila

#490 Comment By Affiliate school On September 25, 2009 @ 12:54 pm

I doubt that it’s worth your time. It looks very time consuming and in my experience people tend to ignore Wikipedia results if they don’t look for general information like explanations and so on. If somebody is looking for stuff he can buy online he will simply ignore Wikipedia because he obviously knows that he can’t buy anything there :)
So I think you should not simply try to outrank Wikipedia no matter what. I guess it’s recommended to study your keywords and target groups first.

#491 Comment By Jason On September 27, 2009 @ 12:29 am

Gonna try this out. Cant seem to beat a few authority sites

#492 Comment By Retail jobs Newcastle Upon Tyne On September 27, 2009 @ 2:51 am

Some of my sites have been able to overthrow wiki, others haven’t. I think there’s a degree of luck involved. On a separate note, why does Google rate Wiki so much? Anyone can edit it!?

#493 Comment By Forex Hosting On September 30, 2009 @ 7:14 am

Sounds like a great deal of work and hassle to implement for a site that is not in direct competition with a site selling a specific product. I believe if time is of the essence then it could be spent on other more important areas of SEO. Just my two cents worth though.

#494 Comment By Golden triangle tour On October 5, 2009 @ 3:10 am

Everything is clearly explained in this blog so it is the best blog according to me …… Thanks

#495 Comment By Bruce On October 5, 2009 @ 1:06 pm

Omg, so many comments. I’ve read through some first comments. This article and commentators are very valuable, thanks.

Many people here mentioned that you could get banned or sandboxed by google if you put your link in wikipedia. Well, I had backlinks at wikipedia for several months and I didn’t get somehow penalized. Got pretty great portion of visits from there.

Again, great article.
Cheers

[24] Coffee Grinder Reviews

#496 Comment By Payday Uk On October 7, 2009 @ 10:24 pm

Everything is clearly defined. Therefore it is so easy to read for the visitors.

#497 Comment By Miami SEO On October 8, 2009 @ 7:08 pm

WIKIJACKING! I f****** love it!

#498 Comment By Payday No Teletrack On October 9, 2009 @ 3:54 am

Wow! It is really fabulous. I am impressed.

#499 Comment By SEO Manchester On October 9, 2009 @ 9:51 am

Jeez, this is actually a fantastic technique in order to remove wiki results-it is all pretty much down to the internal linking structure of wikipedia which is causing their ranking positions to be high, the way they smart link pages with relevant anchor text is very strong-knocking them out is key to SEO on your own site if they are above you.

Thanks a lot for this.

#500 Comment By Faxless payday On October 9, 2009 @ 10:13 pm

The post is really helpful for the readers because everything is explained in simple way …….. Thanks

#501 Comment By Google sniper On October 13, 2009 @ 9:15 am

Thanks for the post, really really motivated me as some of my niche sites are all dominated by Google. I’ll try to find my sniper gun and take them down those wikipedia sites, will be a fun game for me haha google sniper review

#502 Comment By Herceg Novi On October 19, 2009 @ 1:05 pm

Thanks for this great post, but I have a question - nofollow link. I started a new website, I placed only one nofollow link to it, and it was indexed in only few days. So even nofollow links are actually followed?? Why are they called no follow?

#503 Comment By kids water shoes On October 20, 2009 @ 7:06 pm

I do not completely agree with this….you can overtake wikipedia, with higher rank backlinks and more targetted onsite optimisation… but most backlinks to wikipedia are built into webpages and not actually in blogs and forums so editing can be difficult…JMHO :)

Kim Murphy
[25] Boys Water Shoes

#504 Comment By cheap go go hamsters On October 21, 2009 @ 7:37 am

i’m not so sure about this as well. loads of high ranking backlinks such as .gov and .edu might make a difference though…

#505 Comment By cheap go go hamsters On October 21, 2009 @ 7:38 am

im not so sure about this either.. having lots of high pr traget links might make a difference such as .edu and.gov but its not going to be easy!

#506 Comment By Cebu Website Developer On October 21, 2009 @ 3:13 pm

For me Wikipedia is linking the page from the highrank page and once the page crawls it crals back to the new page.thats a wise idea…

Oliver Concepts

#507 Comment By bluehost host On October 22, 2009 @ 7:31 pm

Who cares? Wiki doesn’t do anything but educate.

#508 Comment By Dexter On October 23, 2009 @ 7:46 pm

but actually nofollow links also counted by Yahoo but not Google. Discussions are still in hot whether it is worth to do on follow or nofollow links.

#509 Comment By Hurley On October 24, 2009 @ 4:11 am

Oh I see it seems perfectly honest to do what you’re saying here. You’re only helping wiki by removing the links to sites that have nothing to do with the wiki info. Then dropping a link to all the blogs linking in is just straight up a good idea.

[26] Jacket Shopping

#510 Comment By 6 Pack Abs On October 24, 2009 @ 10:58 am

I’ve heard some stories thatn it is possible to toss a wikipedia result with enough due dilligence. Obviously it’s been done quite a few times before.

#511 Comment By Best Weight Loss Book On October 24, 2009 @ 11:08 am

Superb commentary. I don’t personally have this problem but I’m sure it could be a pain.

#512 Comment By Daisy On October 24, 2009 @ 11:50 am

I never thought it could actually be possible to overtake Wikipedia. You really are a genius Eli!

#513 Comment By House Season 6 On October 25, 2009 @ 1:21 am

I will try this one on my my blogs, hope it works really well… Thanks!

#514 Comment By szemi On October 25, 2009 @ 3:19 pm

Great article, and great idea, thanks. I will try it now…

#515 Comment By Dexter Streaming On October 25, 2009 @ 10:00 pm

Thanks for giving out this precious information. Would really need to dig deeper to find out the real solution.

#516 Comment By ithandbag On October 26, 2009 @ 12:49 am

I liked the content on this site. Would like to visit again.

#517 Comment By Resveratrol On October 26, 2009 @ 9:03 pm

Consider for example the great Wikipedia user Essjay. He achieved a high position of trust on Wikipedia claiming to be a tenured university professor with two doctorates in religion. However, a real religion expert would have little time to spend on Wikipedia. But by lying about his credentials, he was able to achieve power on Wikipedia. I seriously doubt something like that would happen at Encyclopedia Britannica. And what did James Wales do when the New Yorker blew the lid on Essjay? Wales defended Essjay and even gave him a job!

#518 Comment By Sumedh On October 27, 2009 @ 3:51 am

Hahaha…awesome technique… :)

Lot of people have started hating wikipedia actually…

#519 Comment By hypnotherpy winchester On October 27, 2009 @ 9:06 am

Hmmm…. interesting idea, but I’m not sure if it will work under all circumstances….

#520 Comment By medigap On October 27, 2009 @ 3:03 pm

It sounds like it might work but wouldn’t you have to have a very good reason to remove the sites? Wouldn’t the editors catch you adding your own?

#521 Comment By David On October 30, 2009 @ 11:34 am

Wikipedia is always there damit :) So many good niches I found I have dropped because there is a wikipedia page haunting in the first position. Soon when my experience is strong enough I will try to implement this technique kindly given here and take wiki down!

#522 Comment By Ralph On October 31, 2009 @ 6:36 pm

Awsome article, I love to read your blog, bookmarked…

#523 Comment By Chris On November 1, 2009 @ 12:48 am

You have an interesting idea here to beat wikipedia result, but im not sure if this will work under all circumstances….

[27] Super Weight Loss Plans

Chris

#524 Comment By Sandy On November 1, 2009 @ 12:51 am

Never heard of Blue Hat SEO…. aware of white & black. New is a new conecpt for me altogether…

Bookmarked your blog for further reading..

[28] The All Health Blog

#525 Comment By SK Plastic Surgery On November 4, 2009 @ 5:20 pm

nice! you could achieve this with a little gray hat thingy… great and informative article mate.

#526 Comment By Ryan On November 5, 2009 @ 10:13 pm

Ryan Chapman / Web Designer of Small
[29] Business Websites

#527 Comment By Buy Home Gyms On November 6, 2009 @ 12:54 pm

Takes some dedication and stealth but all things are possible.

#528 Comment By Diablo 3 release On November 8, 2009 @ 8:52 pm

Great, great informational website.

#529 Comment By table tennis conversion tops On November 10, 2009 @ 3:34 am

Wikipedia have always seemed so formidable, i never imagined you could overthrow this goliath

#530 Comment By table tennis conversion tops On November 10, 2009 @ 3:36 am

well you must know some magic tricks that we are not aware of

#531 Comment By table tennis conversion tops On November 10, 2009 @ 3:37 am

Now that would be black hat seo for sure

#532 Comment By table tennis conversion tops On November 10, 2009 @ 3:37 am

And you sound suitably proud of the fact too!

#533 Comment By table tennis conversion tops On November 10, 2009 @ 3:38 am

blacklist with google or wiki?

#534 Comment By table tennis conversion tops On November 10, 2009 @ 3:39 am

Good going a little elbow grease paid off

#535 Comment By table tennis conversion tops On November 10, 2009 @ 3:41 am

More good advice

#536 Comment By table tennis conversion tops On November 10, 2009 @ 3:43 am

Eli wears more hats than the mad hatter

#537 Comment By Buy Backlinks On November 10, 2009 @ 4:47 pm

@ Andy: some important wikipedia pages can not be changed by one person. Every change has to be controlled and accepted by at least 2 other persons.

#538 Comment By Las Vegas Personal Injury Lawyer On November 10, 2009 @ 9:42 pm

This type of thing has also become a problem with much more malicious sites ranking ahead of businesses. A gossip site for instance ranking ahead of a person’s business for a search on their name. Is there any strategy for knocking those kinds of sites off the first page of Google?

#539 Comment By Cebu Events On November 11, 2009 @ 10:59 pm

I been to wikipedia since im college it helps me a lot… hope thier is a downloadable version :)

#540 Comment By ReginaGirl On November 12, 2009 @ 8:14 am

Thanks for sharing. Just didn’t wonder we can actually get results from wiki in such a way.

#541 Comment By Daydream1 On November 14, 2009 @ 12:16 pm

Don’t forget the “normal” optimisation techniques - good keyword density, title and description relevance, alt tags on images, etc. Every bit helps.

#542 Comment By Lifespurpose On November 16, 2009 @ 11:19 am

I agree with your post and this goes to show that link juice matters. The higher the page ranks linking to your sites the more valuable Google see your sites. Good insight.

#543 Comment By sean On November 16, 2009 @ 9:34 pm

Thats awesome. Definitely bookmarking this page.. I just got my first site on page one.. SEO is pretty cool!

#544 Comment By eyetest On November 19, 2009 @ 5:20 am

I have had my eye on this technique. Lets say i would like to edit the Wikipedia entry, do i need to wait some time before knocking the legs of the links or can this be done straight way?

#545 Comment By Our simply On November 19, 2009 @ 10:54 am

goooooooooooooooooood

#546 Comment By Martha Jones On November 19, 2009 @ 9:14 pm

I would love to try this out. Always looking for more exciting and fun ways to build backlinks. BTW, can anyone, other than the author, confirm that the method is working for him/her? Much appreciated!

#547 Comment By Back Muscle Pain On November 20, 2009 @ 3:19 pm

WikiPedia has blocked me from ranking #1 sooo many times in countless niches, and has even turned me away from even entering a niche. Great info in this blog post and I will be sure to implement your steps shown.

Thanks!

#548 Comment By free website design On November 22, 2009 @ 12:56 pm

It’s all about the links and unfortunately, Yahoo explorer doesn’t show all links. Hence, you’ll never find out all those links which truely matters in Big G’s eyes and thus, difficult to dethrown the wiki page.

#549 Comment By Teen Forums On November 22, 2009 @ 4:08 pm

Guys, some of you really need to understand the difference between sarcasm and real remarks :D
The technique described here is perfectly legal, and ingenious too :)

#550 Comment By Fluorescent Desk Lamp On November 22, 2009 @ 5:45 pm

I’ve been trying to use this tactic but it’s hard when the term is so well established on wikipedia.

#551 Comment By JohnV On November 23, 2009 @ 10:14 am

I usually dont go after a niche when wikipedia is first(before deciding I check the links of course) but I havent yet found a niche where wiki is first is worth the effort, but I am learning and the day will come that beating wiki is no problem :)

#552 Comment By العاب بنات On November 23, 2009 @ 2:13 pm

great post …thanks

#553 Comment By zhu zhu On November 24, 2009 @ 11:26 pm

Good post! Overthrowing a result like that needs a good amount of work.

#554 Comment By hypotheekrentes On November 25, 2009 @ 5:52 am

This really is some bue hat stuff!

#555 Comment By Kevin Sorrell On November 25, 2009 @ 4:33 pm

Is that why wiki is banned in some schools ?

#556 Comment By Web Design Melbourne On November 26, 2009 @ 11:56 am

Jane, you don’t have to worry about be placed on black list by bloging or placing wiki links. Because, in that case, competition could do same with your site, and nobody would be safe any more ;-)

#557 Comment By David On November 27, 2009 @ 5:36 am

When you do not take ambitious goals you do not achieve a lot.

#558 Comment By Argentina On November 29, 2009 @ 2:38 pm

you being sarcastic or am I not understanding what?

#559 Comment By La Digue On November 30, 2009 @ 4:18 am

Superb post. Definitely worth the read.

#560 Comment By dog costumes On December 3, 2009 @ 7:21 pm

Everything is beatable just need more backlink and have a good link popularity for the chosen keywords.

#561 Comment By Feriehus Arguineguin On December 4, 2009 @ 6:54 am

All these tips came in very handy.

[30] Bahia Feliz

#562 Comment By Tulum On December 4, 2009 @ 7:36 pm

Great post. I love any ideas to take down wiki. The fact of the matter is you make a great site and get a crappy wiki article above you that surely people don’t click on anymore! But they do…

#563 Comment By Oral Health Basics On December 5, 2009 @ 10:21 pm

fortunately, Blue is my favourite colour! :)

#564 Comment By Chris On December 8, 2009 @ 1:30 am

Sneaky, Sneaky!

Your right in saying that the Wiki is irrelevant however, I believe they store you IP address which can lead to being blacklisted.

#565 Comment By Anthony Young On December 8, 2009 @ 1:56 am

If you are worried about getting blacklisted, simply use the good old rotating proxies.

[31] Driver Detective

#566 Comment By 32rv635db On December 9, 2009 @ 7:13 am

Good tips for getting above wiki

#567 Comment By RTA Cabinets On December 10, 2009 @ 9:57 am

#568 Comment By kostenlose Rollenspiele On December 10, 2009 @ 10:04 am

Great blog. It’s very difficult to find useful proxylists on the internet

#569 Comment By Shop On December 10, 2009 @ 1:51 pm

I think it can but im not certain.

#570 Comment By Michael Florin On December 10, 2009 @ 3:33 pm

Great ideas! I will definitely put these to use. I kind of despise wiki as what they publish is opinions a lot of the time and once something is published, whether it is true or not, it is difficult to get it removed no matter how untrue or damaging the false claim is.

#571 Comment By desks for sale On December 11, 2009 @ 9:47 pm

I tried this and it does work … multiple ips is easy by apartment buildings with open wifi

#572 Comment By navigation systems for cars On December 12, 2009 @ 2:10 pm

wow this sounds like it should work i will definitely try it!

#573 Comment By Solar Energy On December 12, 2009 @ 9:29 pm

This is truly makings of an evil genius. Match all their external blog and forum links, and then slowly remove all their own internal links. Truely great idea.

#574 Comment By Lap Harp On December 14, 2009 @ 5:29 am

I tried link removing in Wikipedia but someone kept putting them back in. I guess the technique is becoming too well known.

#575 Comment By targeted advertising On December 14, 2009 @ 1:51 pm

I tried to get the wiki page on targeted advertising down a couple of pegs. Unfortunately it didn’t work :(

#576 Comment By Medifast On December 17, 2009 @ 6:32 pm

It is really informative post,..i will try it. But i dont know more if it is give backlinks.

#577 Comment By College Campus On December 18, 2009 @ 6:35 am

According to Rand Fishkin, CEO of SEOmoz, his Wikipedia listing on the “search engine marketing” entry generates more traffic than his first page ranking on Google for “search engine marketing.”

#578 Comment By Phen375 On December 18, 2009 @ 4:12 pm

Nice article! Thanks for sharing

#579 Comment By Male extra On December 18, 2009 @ 4:14 pm

Very useful, thanks!

#580 Comment By increase your vertical On December 21, 2009 @ 1:02 am

Hahah yeah man. This is excellent. I’m trying to rank for two keywords and wikipedia and wikihow are above me - ill try this out :)

Thanks man :)

Gurko from [33] jump higher

#581 Comment By Sebastian On December 21, 2009 @ 1:44 pm

Thans for the article :)

#582 Comment By shoebuy coupons On December 21, 2009 @ 6:57 pm

I’ll have to make good use.thanks for answering it.

#583 Comment By Lalit On December 24, 2009 @ 11:37 am

I have tried few tricks but no sucess. seems this will work

Lalit
Owner @
[34] Admin Support

#584 Comment By Free iPod touch On December 24, 2009 @ 3:41 pm

Oh at least someone is posting!!!

#585 Comment By Potat ricer On December 27, 2009 @ 2:47 am

Nice idea. Will give it a go next time

#586 Comment By Hunde Legetoej On December 29, 2009 @ 10:04 am

This strategy is a real time killer, but I’m sure it’ll work:)

#587 Comment By stand up comedy On January 1, 2010 @ 1:00 am

“not some faggy Wikipedia page saying what they are” haha - great article, thanks!

#588 Comment By Phuket Rental Villas On January 1, 2010 @ 10:46 am

“Great information, thanks!”

#589 Comment By Breathing Space Thailand On January 1, 2010 @ 11:04 am

Luxury Residential Alcohol Drug Rehab

#590 Comment By How to Learn Thai On January 1, 2010 @ 11:14 am

Learn Thai Language

#591 Comment By Source Girl On January 1, 2010 @ 11:41 am

Best Open Source Software

#592 Comment By Watch free Movies without downloading them On January 2, 2010 @ 1:10 pm

Very interesting, I can comepletely use it ^^ Lots of props to you for giving this information out! Will post back after I tried this hehe

#593 Comment By Watch free Movies without downloading them On January 2, 2010 @ 1:13 pm

Oh yeah, could u pls like give us some great reason examples to be given to wiki in order to remove those links. Just some examples would be great =)

Websites favorited

#594 Comment By EON8 On January 3, 2010 @ 11:02 am

Bring back EON8 to Wikipedia!

#595 Comment By Beth On January 3, 2010 @ 6:11 pm

Unfortunately, I have no idea what you are speaking about relative to the inner structure of Wikipedia.

I am a florist who can type. That’s about it.

If there is something I can do at that level, I am all fingers and at your service.

#596 Comment By LeahDizon On January 4, 2010 @ 12:04 am

never heard anything about bluehat seo…thanks for this useful post…bookmarked…

#597 Comment By Garmin Rino On January 4, 2010 @ 2:14 pm

Nice way to rank yourself and also a great lesson in SEO!
[35] Garmin Rino GPS

#598 Comment By stupid funny videos On January 4, 2010 @ 9:54 pm

lol… nice stuff.

#599 Comment By quiche On January 6, 2010 @ 1:41 am

thanks… never thought of point nr 2, have to try it out!

#600 Comment By Prospect Solution On January 6, 2010 @ 4:58 am

Nice article… thanks…

Student Writer Jobs

#601 Comment By Gochi On January 6, 2010 @ 6:57 pm

Wow that was helpful! I have been trying to get above wikipedia for a long time! Now I’m unstoppable!

#602 Comment By Van On January 7, 2010 @ 4:22 am

Interesting strategy. I never heard of that before. I understand the dilemma with wikedia crowing the space in the top 10. I have tried to optimise for a couple of sites without success.

#603 Comment By Formax On January 7, 2010 @ 9:11 pm

Remember that Yahoo site explorer isn’t a complete list of inbound links - but it is a good start.
decollator

#604 Comment By juicy couture On January 8, 2010 @ 12:14 pm

I tried to create some pages on many wiki sites other than wiki media recently, it looks like spamm, but some got high rank and it can give us one way back links.
The problem is it will cost some time because many wiki sites don’t allow us to create pages.

[36] Juicy Couture

#605 Comment By Sammy On January 9, 2010 @ 6:07 am

thanks for sharing this tips. I just hope that people will use wiki sites for the sharing a good public knowledge and nothing more.
Sam @ [37] Father of the bride speeches

#606 Comment By seo On January 10, 2010 @ 11:54 am

I guess Google will never let a site ranking better than wikipedia. Is that a problem? Not really as everybody knows that Wikipedia isn´t commercial at all.

#607 Comment By simon On January 10, 2010 @ 3:41 pm

Interesting advice.

[38] Simon

#608 Comment By Free Super Laptops On January 11, 2010 @ 5:08 pm

Yeah if you find a good source on yahoo with quality links inside, heaven arrives :) and you can almost rank on anything

[39] NoteBook Air Free!! claim yours now

#609 Comment By iklan gratis On January 12, 2010 @ 2:47 am

I would love to see if wiki allow us to create pages just like hubpages or squidoo. Thanks for sharing

#610 Comment By toilet flapper On January 12, 2010 @ 6:55 am

soon will try this out for a few of my domains which are in the same condition..

#611 Comment By madex On January 15, 2010 @ 2:24 am

good idea my friend

#612 Comment By Toddlers Snow Boots On January 15, 2010 @ 1:24 pm

I really enjoy reading your article. Keep it up the good work.

#613 Comment By elitejdm On January 16, 2010 @ 3:07 pm

Great i think i may try this after some more info of course.[40] jdm

#614 Comment By How to grow mushrooms On January 17, 2010 @ 8:47 pm

It is very hard to overthrow a wiki page.

[41] How to grow mushrooms

#615 Comment By kapatcha On January 18, 2010 @ 9:37 pm

Hmm, great article, can i have some more infos please?

#616 Comment By eee reviews On January 18, 2010 @ 11:30 pm

Very helpful articles, i already bookmark and will come to see your new articles soon.

#617 Comment By Wine Aerator On January 19, 2010 @ 11:40 pm

[42] Wine AeratorThanks for keeping your site up to date and working, we all know it costs you money and we appreciate all your money and hard work that you put into it

#618 Comment By Formax Folder Inserter On January 20, 2010 @ 7:11 am

Unfortunately, my ecommerce site doesn’t compete with Wikipedia - but I hope to be able to use this tip in the future.

#619 Comment By how to get rid of a yeast infection On January 21, 2010 @ 4:40 am

I have found this article on a twitter post, and I had to read it. This article will open people eyes in this type of industry.

Thank you for sharing, really interesting.

#620 Comment By lavernajoy On January 23, 2010 @ 11:11 am

Wondering if your site was penalized by Google, has created a link to it from Wikipedia?

[43] pandora charm bracelets

#621 Comment By ladies perfumes On January 23, 2010 @ 11:18 am

Oh I see it seems perfectly honest to do what you’re saying here. You’re only helping wiki by removing the links to sites that have nothing to do with the wiki info. Then dropping a link to all the blogs linking in is just straight up a good idea.

[44] ladies perfumes

#622 Comment By bjarne On January 25, 2010 @ 2:07 am

some of their methods stand their ground, it takes much more effort to over come this. Trust me…

#623 Comment By Chai On January 27, 2010 @ 8:53 pm

Interesting stuff! Is this still valid today?

#624 Comment By Webstandard-Blog On January 28, 2010 @ 2:03 am

Nice article, but do you think ist “bluehatseo” it seems to be very “black” ;o)

#625 Comment By pheromones for men On January 29, 2010 @ 8:45 am

I would not want to get blacklisted from Wikipedia.

#626 Comment By Natascha On January 29, 2010 @ 5:16 pm

Thanks for sharing. I enjoyed reading it. But…spamming Wikipedia. You think this is a good idea, especially for the long run? Maybe you are successful for a short period of time, but I am pretty sure, if you decide to use the strategy, you will be penalized in the future.
[45] Boudoir photography Orlando

#627 Comment By watch weeds On January 30, 2010 @ 6:36 pm

I have found this article on a twitter post, and I had to read it. This article will open people eyes in this type of industry.

Thank you for sharing, really interesting.
i have also something to share you… [46] watch weeds

#628 Comment By Wilson On January 31, 2010 @ 8:58 am

This is the first time I heard of a blue hat SEO - a brilliant and straight forward idea you got there. They put it in, you take it out.

Warm Regards and respect.

#629 Comment By fr33mumia On February 1, 2010 @ 7:56 am

Am i gonna be blacklisted by Wiki?

#630 Comment By Mid Mo Mortgage On February 1, 2010 @ 8:12 am

Great! I always just gave up when trying to compete with Wikipedia. I had no idea I could just win by knocking their own feet out from under them.

#631 Comment By Naples lawn care On February 1, 2010 @ 9:41 am

I’ve never thought of this idea! Very interesting.

[47] Naples lawn care

#632 Comment By SEO Web Design by David On February 1, 2010 @ 1:56 pm

I thought Wikipedia couldn’t be toppled. Now this gives me hope…Thanks

#633 Comment By Driver detective On February 4, 2010 @ 5:26 am

Good advices! it’s hard to beat strong wikipedia results, above all cause often they have many links from sites. It clear that a hard work has convenience only for a great return for job, you ust to be sure that have first placeas give you money in return!

#634 Comment By rosario On February 6, 2010 @ 8:13 am

The comments are also great :)

#635 Comment By pj01 On February 7, 2010 @ 2:47 am

Ive never used blue hat seo technique before but it has a style and i think the technique is good. thanks for the post.

[48] sunglasses

#636 Comment By Lottery Syndicate On February 8, 2010 @ 9:26 am

Me to, i though Google owned Wiki? So how could anyone tople Google?

#637 Comment By Procerin On February 8, 2010 @ 1:13 pm

I think the technique is good. Very useful information thanks a lot. Now i know what wiki about or useful to us.

#638 Comment By Sytropin On February 8, 2010 @ 1:19 pm

As i know about Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia. But its great i know more about wiki here. Thanks the info everyone.

#639 Comment By Walter On February 9, 2010 @ 8:11 am

Yeah - funny thing here - I’ve been studying how someone built up their google ranking with this very technique and posting on the same blogs & forums as they do to increase my rankings.

And how ironic is that I come across a blog post explaining my technique to me as I’m using it?

It’s like I’m at a Carnival in the house of infinite mirrors. I don’t know how I got here anymore or just how deep the rabbit hole is.

Crazy man!

Now I’m going to do the obligatory anchor text back to my website that no one visits even though this will be no-follow :-(

-sigh-

Such is life.


[49] Laid Off

#640 Comment By tama superstar On February 9, 2010 @ 9:27 am

Seems quite risky to me. If you get banned from logging into wikipedia what are you gonna do then!?

#641 Comment By Web 2.0 Graphics On February 9, 2010 @ 10:05 am

Overthrowing a Wikipedia result is pretty difficult, but it can be done, great guide. Especially on small/micro niches.

#642 Comment By Pozycjonowanie On February 9, 2010 @ 2:49 pm

Then in a day or so you can go back (obviously from a different IP/account) and remove all those links PLUS many of the original legit links in the name of cleaning up after “the spammer”. Just make sure you don’t look too obvious.

#643 Comment By Creative Zen On February 10, 2010 @ 6:41 am

great article! thats something i didnt know :)

#644 Comment By Mathias On February 10, 2010 @ 7:58 am

Don’t think those tricks are the way…

#645 Comment By DIY Generator On February 10, 2010 @ 2:23 pm

I think overthrowing wikipedia woul be extremely difficult, but then look at what happened to the early search engines when Google came along!

#646 Comment By Ralf Zmölnig On February 11, 2010 @ 5:09 am

…why do you accept all this spamshit here?

#647 Comment By buddy thomas On February 12, 2010 @ 5:13 am

heres something i didnt know, ive never heard of blue-hat seo, its quite interesting

#648 Comment By Matt On February 12, 2010 @ 1:13 pm

so simple, yet so brilliant!

#649 Comment By Chris On February 12, 2010 @ 4:03 pm

This was one of the most interesting SEO strategy i have ever laid my eyes on, thanks a million! Literally…

#650 Comment By Chris On February 12, 2010 @ 4:05 pm

Yea, Wiki needs to step aside once in while, ya know…

[50] stop smoking weed

#651 Comment By Creative Zen On February 13, 2010 @ 12:55 am

unique seo strategy

#652 Comment By watch entourage On February 13, 2010 @ 10:24 pm

This is one of the nice tips which are given above so its valuable for the newbies like me anyway Thanks for the beautiful stuff…

#653 Comment By Contrave On February 16, 2010 @ 6:49 pm

Wikipedia seems like it is always there when going for keywords, so they are the ones you will always have to contend with. These are some good tips, especially posting links on the same sites Wikipedia has links. With a bit of effort they can be dethroned.

#654 Comment By Phil and Teds Stroller|Prams and Pushchairs On February 17, 2010 @ 2:48 pm

You can definately take wiki out of the picture, you need to remove the legs from it one by one.

#655 Comment By Phil and Teds Stroller On February 17, 2010 @ 2:52 pm

I just wanted to add that it isn’t always worth worrying about a wiki listing abouve yours, especially if your selling something as most people recognise wiki as an informative site and will move on to the next listing in the serps.

#656 Comment By Rahb On February 17, 2010 @ 5:13 pm

Match & exceed!

#657 Comment By Black Computer Desks On February 18, 2010 @ 3:18 am

I can nearly always defeat wiki, the tips above are helpful and part of what I do but there are a few other secrets!!

#658 Comment By wall sconces lighting On February 19, 2010 @ 11:45 pm

Bluehat? I thought there are only white, black and grey hat. Or do you mean bluehat in terms of shades of grey?

#659 Comment By John On February 20, 2010 @ 4:14 pm

I doubt that you can outrank a wikipedia page, too much authority I guess. However, I outranked a wikianswers though.

So maybe there’s a way to outrank it:)

#660 Comment By Pitbull Training On February 21, 2010 @ 3:30 pm

This idea sounds very very interesting, but I wonder if the Wikipedia police would pay a blind eye - especially when you make similar changes to many pages in Wikipedia.

A great article by the way

Diane Gale

#661 Comment By Martin Kono On February 22, 2010 @ 12:55 am

Advances SEO tactics - I had no idea such thing exist!

#662 Comment By Magento Development On February 22, 2010 @ 6:41 am

Really interesting and useful stuff… thanks for sharing

#663 Comment By Facrbook Development On February 22, 2010 @ 6:45 am

Thanks for sharing this tips and tactics

#664 Comment By Really HGH On February 22, 2010 @ 8:10 pm

witty AND verbose commentary from you HGH, great job.. ;)

#665 Comment By MLM Training On February 23, 2010 @ 5:40 pm

I think the technique is good. Very useful information thanks a lot. Now i know what wiki about or useful to us.

#666 Comment By Aphrodisiacs Info On February 23, 2010 @ 7:49 pm

Wikipedia is a pain in the butt! Even if their articles are complete crap they can still dominate. It’s kind of a farce actually. Just goes to show that G has no idea what “quality” is, really.

FYI Eli, according to Google toolbar, this page is in Arabic…

#667 Comment By London Escort On February 24, 2010 @ 4:29 am

I love wiki its so good from a research point of view.

#668 Comment By chaney On February 27, 2010 @ 3:57 am

After reading this post, I decided not to do it against wikipedia alone but to all of my competitors… I see new hope.. thanks a lot..

#669 Comment By Dallas Auto Insurance On February 27, 2010 @ 8:48 pm

How does blue hat compare to black or white?

[51] Dallas Auto Insurance

#670 Comment By Kino-ru On February 28, 2010 @ 3:48 pm

Thanks for this simple solution

#671 Comment By telecharger sonnerie gratuite On February 28, 2010 @ 9:07 pm

I think i do not regret reading your post. It is really wonderful.

#672 Comment By shane On March 2, 2010 @ 9:09 am

I have always heard of balckhat and whitehat first time I heard of bluehat awesome post!

[52] http://www.binaryburn.com

#673 Comment By Brushesstock On March 2, 2010 @ 11:32 am

I think that Wikipedia cannot really be considered as a reliable source if you’re researching for work or school, but just to check general information it can be pretty accurate, and it’s easy and quick.

#674 Comment By Male Yeast Infections On March 3, 2010 @ 11:35 am

Thanks for sharing. I’ll test your 5-steps out and let you know how they work for me.

Bryan
Male
Yeast Infections

#675 Comment By peirse On March 4, 2010 @ 4:08 am

Thanks for sharing! thumbs up and bookmarked ;) Right…

#676 Comment By tinnitus treatment On March 4, 2010 @ 9:11 am

When editing Wiki, I also recommend getting a login or, even better, using several.

AFAIK, only the absolute top cream of the crop are able to view the IPs behind usernames. The regular editors and moderators do not get that ability.

Chris

#677 Comment By Tractor Parts On March 4, 2010 @ 12:09 pm

I like this post. Now that i understand how to us wikipedia, I’m certain I will use it more. Thanks!

#678 Comment By Pest Control Cary On March 4, 2010 @ 8:34 pm

Being as competitive as I am I’ll be using this strategy when needed.

#679 Comment By rice cooker stainless steel On March 7, 2010 @ 5:58 am

Thanks for this trick. Now I will try to implement it

#680 Comment By deathmatch online On March 8, 2010 @ 1:28 pm

thanks for the tip, go bluehat

#681 Comment By Drug Rehabs On March 8, 2010 @ 1:50 pm

I want to take this opportunity to say that I really love this blog. It has been a good resource of information for my SEO work. Thank you so much admin.

#682 Comment By Photovoltaics On March 9, 2010 @ 11:13 pm

Most times I avoid trying to dominate pages that have wiki content because even if you push the to number two they might still get more clicks than you so what’s the use.

#683 Comment By Computer Tips and Tech Talk On March 15, 2010 @ 2:56 am

No matter how unreliable it is, wikipedia is still somehow informatic for most of the people. BTW good technique up there.

#684 Comment By Local Search On March 15, 2010 @ 4:10 pm

A few nice tips to have a go at over the next few days! Thanks.

#685 Comment By Combson Yachts On March 16, 2010 @ 3:02 am

Unbelievable text…My website is in a very competitive market and I’m doing well, but many times my pages suffer from those Wiki articles…
Yachts and Superyachts and the whole yachting industry are much better explained on my pages!

#686 Comment By Eastern Mediterranean Cruises On March 16, 2010 @ 3:11 pm

Iv always managed to get a few links from wikipedia you just need to have the right relevant content and try and sneak it under the radar.

Great tips man, thanks.

#687 Comment By Iron Condor On March 20, 2010 @ 5:32 am

Thanks for a great post. I never kenew wiki could be bumped off like that. i’m going to try it.

#688 Comment By Popcorn Machine Cart On March 20, 2010 @ 10:12 am

Great idea! I will definitely put this to use!
[53] Popcorn Machine Cart

#689 Comment By Find Your Solution On March 22, 2010 @ 3:31 am

Great post and great tips! thanks.

#690 Comment By garden pond supplies On March 22, 2010 @ 6:28 am

This is an interesting post, I helps.
thanks

#691 Comment By Hobo Bags On March 22, 2010 @ 10:00 pm

thanks for sharing nice post,It is really wonderful and informatics.

#692 Comment By Best On March 23, 2010 @ 6:57 am

I’m pretty new at this affiliate marketing. But definitely thanks for the advice. Going to delicious bookmark this site and follow you for more tips and information.

#693 Comment By Anna Brown On March 24, 2010 @ 5:19 am

Wow, this tips are very helpful. Thank you so much Guys!

#694 Comment By Jocuri On March 24, 2010 @ 11:09 am

Man wiki really spurs you guys to discussions. I tried your method and some fa*** kept reverting the pages where i removed the link…I think it was the wiki bot or something.. :(

#695 Comment By Registry Cleaners On March 25, 2010 @ 7:47 am

It is not true that you will ban with max link with wiki. Al thought it is really tuff to get link from wiki.

#696 Comment By web On April 5, 2010 @ 11:17 pm

This post is kinda old but it makes a lot of sense even if you are not after outranking any pages from wikipedia. Yahoo site explorer is already giving you all the information you need how to outrank any site in the search engine, you just have to take action.

Nice post, btw.

#697 Comment By flash effects On April 9, 2010 @ 12:25 pm

yes, i agree with you above ^
good post

#698 Comment By rude jokes On April 10, 2010 @ 12:20 pm

Go back to reading Shoemoney, john chow, zach johnson, dave naylor etc. We’ll welcome you back when you get a bit more experience.

#699 Comment By pheromones On April 11, 2010 @ 10:05 am

An interesting approach to it. I am very optimistic. A lot of great information here, thanks for sharing.

#700 Comment By wczasy On April 11, 2010 @ 11:23 am

It is true, you can never beat Wikipedia at the very beginning. Yet the more brainy you become the more easy dodging them is. It is quest and if you like fighting it can be raising your adrenaline’s levels :P and people, comments should be deprived of any malicy

#701 Comment By Sony On April 12, 2010 @ 4:34 pm

I have tried posting some articles on Wikio but never managed to find them after..

#702 Comment By Eureka 71A Hand Held Vacuum On April 13, 2010 @ 2:28 pm

I scrapbooked your steps, in case I need it someday :) . So far I never found wiki as a top search in my niche.

#703 Comment By Powderdusy On April 18, 2010 @ 10:44 am

Vitamin og [54] http://www.powderdust.dk is very nice

#704 Comment By Junk Silver On April 19, 2010 @ 12:26 am

Usualy Wikipadia pages has not many inbound links. Copy the links of your competitors plus add 50-100 your own links - and voila!

[55] Junk silver

#705 Comment By Andrew On April 19, 2010 @ 1:59 am

In time you would jump ahead of the wiki entries doing large volumes of SEO work.

#706 Comment By vps On April 20, 2010 @ 4:33 am

it was nice post and give very useful information

#707 Comment By Disney Games On April 22, 2010 @ 4:29 am

I am trying to overthrow a Wiki page now, its really tough to do! I have had loads of quality backlinks and still I can’t! But thanks I will follow some of your tips. Thanks for sharing.

#708 Comment By Web design On April 22, 2010 @ 11:32 pm

Thank you for shring this. I’m printing this article for my reading. I will be using this tips in future. :)

#709 Comment By Carros Antigos Tunados On April 25, 2010 @ 4:14 pm

It still works?

#710 Comment By handbags On April 26, 2010 @ 8:10 am

Great information! Motivates one to know that we are able to compete with such a high ranking website. Thanks for the info!

#711 Comment By carinsurancequote5 On April 27, 2010 @ 12:36 pm

Thanks for your info.

#712 Comment By YakuYaku Translations On April 27, 2010 @ 5:56 pm

Nice information, I’ve got to try this :)

#713 Comment By Luxury Brooklyn apartments & condos On April 28, 2010 @ 3:52 am

Nice Post. I always wondered how wiki came up with such good results when you google the keyword. Now I understand why. Thanks for this information.

#714 Comment By New Delhi SEO On April 29, 2010 @ 9:26 pm

My first time on this site. I am just starting to forray in to black hat, blue hat and other hats. Just for the sake of experimenting at least. Will c ya all around.

#715 Comment By Living On Dividends On April 30, 2010 @ 7:27 pm

This is a pretty shady technique. But, it is BlueHatSEO, afterall.

I have certainly seen affiliate marketers beat wikipedia before. But, I’ll focus on my building up my white hat network for now as it’ll keep me busy for a good while. Good read though.

#716 Comment By Aleksandr Belov On May 1, 2010 @ 10:20 am

thank you, very nice info

#717 Comment By yeast infection On May 2, 2010 @ 6:09 pm

Thanks for this information. It is hard to compete with wikipedia.

#718 Comment By LR On May 4, 2010 @ 11:39 pm

Thanks for this tipp to get wikipedia kicked off

#719 Comment By Lucya On May 5, 2010 @ 2:53 am

It is useful for visitors,so thanks.

#720 Comment By Rickey On May 5, 2010 @ 1:26 pm

I love your website and it has been a Godsend for me. Thanks for everything!

#721 Comment By chanel On May 5, 2010 @ 8:30 pm

you blog is so good ,how did you can do it !

#722 Comment By kosttilskud On May 10, 2010 @ 8:07 am

Great post - And we all know how hard the wikipedia results can be to top :)

#723 Comment By Mediafire Movies On May 11, 2010 @ 3:54 pm

thanks for such a nice info

#724 Comment By seo tactics On May 11, 2010 @ 10:35 pm

thanks for such a nice info

#725 Comment By Lyrics On May 12, 2010 @ 11:10 am

Well I spent a while applying your methods but i just can’t fight wiki and am still 2nd. I don’t know. I guess I should try harder but for now wikipedia looks like a big rock standing infront of me.

#726 Comment By Kohls Coupons On May 13, 2010 @ 1:03 pm

Interesting, thanks for the post.

#727 Comment By Social Media Seo On May 13, 2010 @ 2:43 pm

Great article. I am still a beginner in SEO. How do you effectively remove pages that link to Wikipedia?

#728 Comment By Naruto Manga Spoilers On May 15, 2010 @ 5:15 am

The link in my name above leads to a rant on the subject instigated by some fool deleting a whole article I’d written because he’d staked out a claim to that corner of Wikipedia. It has some funny pictures in it you can spam the mods back with which you might find slightly amusing.

#729 Comment By Facebooksex On May 16, 2010 @ 7:24 am

I really enjoyed reading your article, funny writing style. But i think beating wikipedia is a lost cause, and getting back links from it is even harder i try to focus on more broad terms that wikipedia doesn’t cover

#730 Comment By Søgemaskineoptimering blog On May 18, 2010 @ 5:46 am

A very informative article.

#731 Comment By kensai On May 18, 2010 @ 6:06 am

Beating wikipedia is not that hard, and no google will not penalize you for being in wikipedia (your urls)

#732 Comment By Hamilton Web Design On May 24, 2010 @ 8:48 am

I thought links from wikipeda were nofollow anyway?

#733 Comment By karen On May 24, 2010 @ 6:52 pm

Never thought of wikipedia as such til I read your post. Anyways, thanks for sharing that with us.

#734 Comment By Sarkari naukri On May 25, 2010 @ 5:33 am

I m agree about wikkipedia’s note.
nice article.

#735 Comment By Pat On May 25, 2010 @ 7:19 pm

This is really interesting, not something I would have normally tried to do. Thanks tons for the information in these posts.

#736 Comment By Pat On May 25, 2010 @ 7:24 pm

I really thinks this website is number one for information

#737 Comment By Eve On May 27, 2010 @ 6:18 pm

Thanks, I am trying to learn more about google rankings
sharing a new Cosmology based on a [56] Relativity Ratio.

#738 Comment By luftballons On May 28, 2010 @ 6:15 am

great stuff u write here guy. Many Thx

#739 Comment By Review Shoes On May 30, 2010 @ 10:52 pm

i am now convinced to do more link building in blogs and forums. I can’t apply that wikipedia strategy yet. But thanks for the article! link building will really help

#740 Comment By Mirko On May 31, 2010 @ 8:49 am

It disturbs me always the Wicki the first and mostly also immediately the second place occupied. Man has no chance in it past come up. THX

#741 Comment By Cholesterol Lowering Foods On May 31, 2010 @ 4:21 pm

Excellent information! Wikipedia seems to always pop up at the top of search results. Using this info could help me overcome that.

#742 Comment By e-commerce school On June 1, 2010 @ 9:50 am

this is great for medical related sites because wiki usually has the top spot for those keywords

#743 Comment By loans bad credit Pro On June 1, 2010 @ 10:07 am

Well I spent a while applying your methods but i just can’t fight wiki and am still 2nd. I don’t know. I guess I should try harder but for now wikipedia looks like a big rock standing infront of me.

#744 Comment By Chicago Daily Coupons On June 1, 2010 @ 1:36 pm

Wikipedia has done so much for online community. The recent stricter enforcement of rules is necessary to achieve the goal of a real, online encyclopedia.

#745 Comment By Aleks On June 2, 2010 @ 6:29 am

I don’t think it is a good idea to spam wiki. I think they are in some kind of partnership with google.

#746 Comment By CNA Training On June 3, 2010 @ 11:58 am

Well i’m going to put this to the test to try and knock wiki off the top spot for some of my keywords!

#747 Comment By agence web On June 3, 2010 @ 2:11 pm

thank you
gonna try this out

#748 Comment By The Employment Law Group On June 9, 2010 @ 6:38 am

Its a pleasure reading your post.

#749 Comment By oPal rIngs On June 10, 2010 @ 8:08 am

This is almost evil :) Gotta try it …

#750 Comment By Backlinks On June 11, 2010 @ 5:17 pm

Hey this is a good post, I haven’t actually tried to beat wikipedia, they don’t really have me out ranked for any of my phrases, but I do a lot of searches and I do see that stupid site ranked in a lot of stuff. I think they should be banned from Google =) I mean most people if they want Wikipedia information will go straight to the site, otherwise we search Google right? I usually use Wikipedia to find information on a TV personality or some famous person, I would instantly go to Wikipedia if I wanted to know how old Tom Cruise was (hoping he falls off the face of the planet soon), if I wanted to find out how to buy Top Gun I might search Google, or maybe Amazon. I guess some internet users might like Wikipedia for the information and search Google for that and then click through, but overall I like to use Google for other things. I feel the same way with About.com, their information is usually useless, and it is very generic but they are everywhere.

#751 Comment By Avio karte On June 12, 2010 @ 6:39 am

nice read. i always hear blackat and whitehat and now blue hat. LOL

#752 Comment By Powerful Core On June 13, 2010 @ 7:27 pm

Very nice tips. This will really come in handy. Thanks.

#753 Comment By Jobredo On June 14, 2010 @ 5:24 am

@Avio karte: first time for me either..LOL, but anyway, nice readings, thanks for sharing it.

#754 Comment By Windsor Ontario Real Estate On June 17, 2010 @ 11:58 am

Thanks for the article. It was super informative and definitely helped out! I recommend this method for sure!

#755 Comment By Gift & Accessories On June 17, 2010 @ 10:37 pm

This unique seems to me dissimilar set of post…one who don’t grasp about present before may effectuate pertinent tidings from this post…well i wanna estimate that The wise how u tried to explain some posts at here seems to me different.

#756 Comment By Voeding On June 18, 2010 @ 6:01 am

I’m gonna try this soon, looks interesting with this way. After all, sometimes wikipedia doesn’t match with visitor in some case.

#757 Comment By Heartburn On June 23, 2010 @ 2:35 pm

Great article! But how big is the risk of angering google’s algo?

#758 Comment By kindle On June 24, 2010 @ 5:42 am

The suggestion you are referring to is to edit the Wikipedia pages and remove the links.

#759 Comment By eryaman hali yikama On June 24, 2010 @ 6:23 am

I really thinks this website is number one for information

#760 Comment By conner On June 24, 2010 @ 9:02 am

i LOVE this. thanks guys.

#761 Comment By ecommerce education On June 24, 2010 @ 12:19 pm

i used this guide to over take a wikipedia link in my niche. very helpful guide

#762 Comment By online talk show On June 25, 2010 @ 2:53 am

Its very bad to copy any content from wikipedis Google can crawl the copy of content soon and the page rank will go down.

#763 Comment By ipad covers On June 25, 2010 @ 11:54 am

I also need to beat competitors… Sometime, I feel that backlink is not enough, I have great backlinks, but I wonder why I still loose from the other competitor…

#764 Comment By Brad White On June 25, 2010 @ 8:41 pm

Pretty crazy strategy. Not sure I’ve got the guts.

#765 Comment By Dylan Savvy On June 26, 2010 @ 10:30 am

easycashtutoring.info

#766 Comment By Office Cleaning On June 27, 2010 @ 10:51 am

I like your style of writing but I think you are crazy. I’m not sure if that’s such a Blue Hat SEO technique.

#767 Comment By Escort Service London On June 28, 2010 @ 6:57 am

Good thing I already made to the best commenter of all time.

#768 Comment By magic phone jack reviews On June 29, 2010 @ 2:33 am

LOL! I agree. Great post and thank you very much for sharing this strategy.

#769 Comment By eryaman hali yikama On June 29, 2010 @ 7:18 am

I m agree about wikkipedia’s note.

#770 Comment By Thalasso On June 29, 2010 @ 7:34 am

Nice technic…, i’m gonna try it…

#771 Comment By Minny On June 30, 2010 @ 5:43 am

good idea, i’ll try it

Thank you so much

#772 Comment By john On June 30, 2010 @ 5:51 am

Sounds interesting. I haven’t actually run up against a Wikipedia result yet, but in the future I will definitely take note

#773 Comment By MMORPG On June 30, 2010 @ 3:24 pm

Great, thx for posting, beating wikipedia, its hard

#774 Comment By ORSupply On July 1, 2010 @ 12:16 pm

Great article, I’m going to have to try this!

#775 Comment By iPod Free On July 5, 2010 @ 7:31 am

Fascinating post, I’m going to have a go at the whole blogging thing.

#776 Comment By Blog Peluang BIsnis On July 5, 2010 @ 7:24 pm

New technique ?? Awesome, innovative, I ll try this methods.

#777 Comment By Luxury Perfume On July 5, 2010 @ 7:28 pm

When I read the title, blue Hat ? i wondering, what is that ? finally I understand why it is called like that. Why Blue Hat, not Grey Hat ?

[57] Luxury Perfume

#778 Comment By dentist acton On July 7, 2010 @ 8:26 am

A little unsure as to how to explain to editors that you’re deleting those internal links? From what I’ve seenmany of them are pretty damn strict about ANY changes being made to pages. Esp link links being delinked etc…

Wont they want a plausible explanation? I’m not sure that will be so easy.

#779 Comment By Rosario Hotel On July 7, 2010 @ 9:55 pm

Hey, this is a great idea.

I will destroy all the wikipedia articles that are my competition.

Thanks!

#780 Comment By 10minutetrainer On July 10, 2010 @ 12:37 am

I like your style of writing but I think you are crazy. I’m not sure if that’s such a Blue Hat SEO technique.

#781 Comment By Conveyancing Sydney On July 10, 2010 @ 6:30 pm

Like every seo “trick” this one will eventually be picked up by the powers above (Google). That said I don’t see anything wrong with doing it in the meantime… :)

#782 Comment By health On July 11, 2010 @ 8:52 am

this is cool article. great info found through angela , thanks

#783 Comment By Gregory Burrus On July 12, 2010 @ 11:39 pm

very very interesting discussion. to me you go after wikipedia just like any other site or blog. takes time but doable and possible with the tons of automated business solutions out there. just have to find the right combination of manual and automated work. great article . thanks for sharing gregory burrus

#784 Comment By garmin nuvi 255w review On July 14, 2010 @ 3:16 am

Great post, thanks for sharing.

Cheers

#785 Comment By Dog Obedience Tips On July 14, 2010 @ 9:34 am

Trying to get the best backlinks.
Not very easy. Trying forum postings but, have to wait for them to be approved.

#786 Comment By Dog Obedience Tips On July 14, 2010 @ 9:36 am

I am looking for the fastest ways to create backlinks.

#787 Comment By Forbrukslån On July 14, 2010 @ 12:54 pm

Nice Post i must say!! :)

#788 Comment By Ken On July 17, 2010 @ 1:17 pm

Great post. I love any ideas to take down wiki. The fact of the matter is you make a great site and get a crappy wiki article above you that surely people don’t click on anymore! But they do…

#789 Comment By Darren from finditwithusonline On July 17, 2010 @ 4:53 pm

Cool insight on what to do to out rank a wikipedia page. Now its time to test the steps to see how good this works.

Kind regards & good health,

Darren C.

#790 Comment By Wordpress Themes On July 17, 2010 @ 8:05 pm

Thanks for the article. It is definitely hard to outrank wikipedia, and other big sites, but hopefully my sites will.

#791 Comment By iPad Free On July 18, 2010 @ 11:44 pm

I have to agree when I say that it is hard to find article of such quality so I must thank you for this piece.

#792 Comment By Bidet On July 19, 2010 @ 3:17 pm

Where did you hear this from?

#793 Comment By Bidet On July 19, 2010 @ 3:18 pm

Its always hard beating Wikipedia but with article, it will now be possible. Thanks for sharing it.

#794 Comment By News of the world On July 20, 2010 @ 3:59 am

This article is like a mine giving gold for free, I mean you give away all that cool SEO advise for free.

#795 Comment By Dong quai On July 23, 2010 @ 12:02 am

Frankly I come here by using the link analysis tool of Yahoo Site Explorer. The blue hat trick sounds interesting, which is always something I am looking for to get through the door. Wikipedia is google’s favorite. It is very hard to beat them. Getting link from Wikipedia would be a smart idea.

#796 Comment By Liverpool Builders On July 26, 2010 @ 11:49 am

very nice trick, thanks for this informative post

#797 Comment By PC Arcade Games On July 27, 2010 @ 8:59 pm

well a very nifty trick, ive been searching for info such as this in how to overthrow site like this since its pretty hard to be a competitor of this sites.

#798 Comment By VCD Burning On August 1, 2010 @ 2:02 am

I hope that this system work now, I will try it.
thanks a lot for your step by step guide

#799 Comment By Nail technician courses On August 1, 2010 @ 1:56 pm

I like your article, but i have tried playing with wiki and at first i could not make it. Finaly..i did it, i was happy as kid getting a candy…but after some small amount of time my site got in sandobx…

So i dont know if playing with wiki is good idea

#800 Comment By Patti On August 1, 2010 @ 5:06 pm

Holly cow, this is amazing information!!!!

#801 Comment By vibram On August 1, 2010 @ 9:11 pm

Nice article,Thanks for sharing.
I have to say”The trick is outstanding”

#802 Comment By Stop Smoking Hypnosis Los Angeles On August 3, 2010 @ 12:33 pm

Wow this is perfect.

I’ve been trying for months to get that damn wikipedia result beneath my page.

Hopefully this works.

#803 Comment By Christian On August 3, 2010 @ 8:59 pm

How To Overthrow A Wikipedia day this difficult problem, you think good, I’m in practice

#804 Comment By مسلسلات رمضان 2010 On August 5, 2010 @ 1:34 am

#805 Comment By zach On August 7, 2010 @ 2:47 am

Is this really works?
I should try then..

Thanks for the tips :)

#806 Comment By sidder@blu cig On August 8, 2010 @ 7:12 pm

Very awesome tips,I ll try this method

#807 Comment By new air max On August 9, 2010 @ 5:45 pm

My question was basically the exact same as Jon Waraas’.

When you are targeting a keyword with this networked approach, how tight of circles do you make? Lets use appliances as an example niche. Would you make a site about refrigerators, one on microwaves, ovens, ranges, blenders, etc. Or would you make one on refrigerators, one on refrigeration techniques, one on history of refrigeration, one on cleaning refrigerators, refrigerator repair, etc?

#808 Comment By Commercial Real Estate Investments On August 12, 2010 @ 8:10 am

Some say if you put a link on a Wikipage your site will get banned? If that is the case, can I enter a link of my competitors website and get their sites banned?

Say I’m sitting on #10 and at #1 is a Wikipage… can I place a link on that Wikipage of the sites #2 to #9? When those sites get banned, I shoot up to #2?

Does it work this way too?

#809 Comment By Rapidshare On August 15, 2010 @ 11:34 am

Amazing article. Anyway now we can beat Wiki.

#810 Comment By Pauline On August 15, 2010 @ 8:12 pm

Great post. I like the idea to get into the Wikipedia. Practical implementation issues on a superb site and get a crappy article on the Wikipedia that you make sure people do not click anymore, because I see wikipedia always on top of google search points.
And all in all I do not like Wikipedia at all, not how things sometimes are helpful, but most find the information you are really down. So, I’ve often tried to score as wikipedia. So lucky to find your blog about this. I will send your article to the pounding of my readers, and you will be with me and try this problem,and hopefully it will be effective and achieve success.

#811 Comment By صور هيفاء وهبي On August 16, 2010 @ 2:10 am

Thank you very much, Madam

#812 Comment By warts remedies On August 16, 2010 @ 7:10 am

I wonder if the Wikipedia police would pay a blind eye.

#813 Comment By صور هيفاء On August 19, 2010 @ 6:10 am

Thank you very much

Anyway now we can beat Wiki

#814 Comment By Søgemaskineoptimering On August 20, 2010 @ 2:55 am

Great post as always, Eli, I like how no challenge is ever too big!

#815 Comment By Dog Illness On August 20, 2010 @ 3:29 pm

Dude that is just sick!

That info will definitely come in handy. I’ll be referencing this on my personal blog.

My hat is off to you for this one ;-)

[58] Dog Illness Diagnosis

#816 Comment By coachhandbagsonsale On August 24, 2010 @ 12:33 am

there is no way you can beat wiki, just play along and use it lol

#817 Comment By Traffic Siphon On August 27, 2010 @ 3:42 am

You have got a valid point here. I was never able to overthrow wikipedia but your tips can work.

#818 Comment By Printing Services On August 27, 2010 @ 11:00 pm

Your tips are helpful. Thanks for sharing this.

#819 Comment By Young Insurance Drivers On August 29, 2010 @ 3:28 am

so simple yet brilliant!

#820 Comment By Real Estate Listings San Diego On August 30, 2010 @ 4:17 am

Thanks, this is the info I have been looking for!!!

#821 Comment By kompresory On August 30, 2010 @ 7:56 am

super article

#822 Comment By soso - mosquito killer lady On August 30, 2010 @ 8:45 pm

Is it ok to do that, Do you do it yourself?

#823 Comment By Keyword Research On August 31, 2010 @ 11:21 am

Eli, do you happen to have a wikipedia page dropping service? :) Just had a #1 keyword knocked off from a page which has just appeared from nowhere. Pissed Off!

#824 Comment By Pat Williams On August 31, 2010 @ 8:40 pm

Wow really?! I’m going to have to test this one out. I used to work for an [59] seo firm and it was always hard to get around this. Will come back to let you know if it worked for me.

#825 Comment By Setaimiami On September 1, 2010 @ 12:02 pm

Very cool little article will be looking for more info here…

Thanks

#826 Comment By theGREATunknown On September 3, 2010 @ 6:32 am

Very informative. I’ve been doing some research on wikipedia and this is something very useful. Thanks

#827 Comment By Chicago car service On September 4, 2010 @ 12:18 pm

Excellent info. I’ve done some research on Wikipedia and I think this very useful. Thank you!

#828 Comment By Chicago car service On September 4, 2010 @ 12:20 pm

I start doing this for a friend of mine. So far so good!

#829 Comment By Gurgaon Property On September 6, 2010 @ 4:31 am

Wow very nice post all to excellent search on Wikipedia thanks for sharing.

#830 Comment By TV Spoilers On September 6, 2010 @ 10:31 am

How can you get links to your website to stay on Wikipedia? I have tried a million times to get a backlink from them, and yet it seems it is ALWAYS removed almost immediately. It’s like people sit there and watch specific pages for any competition, and remove it. lol

#831 Comment By scients On September 7, 2010 @ 12:30 am

are you sure this method can work?
i should try this method for sure …thanks LOL

#832 Comment By Peter Dunin On September 13, 2010 @ 4:46 am

Loved reading the article!thanks for sharing it.

#833 Comment By steam shower generator On September 13, 2010 @ 2:32 pm

thanks for sharing, i’m sure i’ll try it soon.

#834 Comment By Forum Roleplay On September 14, 2010 @ 9:07 am

Yeah, I like this. It’s actually pretty common sense type things to do, but as Voltaire said common sense is not so common. The analogy that Eli uses here, the tripod, is a very apt one to use but then again I’m sure Eli and the rest of you knew that. Fortunately I haven’t had to deal with an issue like this, but I feel more secure now that I know what to do should it ever become an issue.

#835 Comment By Concursos Gratis On September 17, 2010 @ 3:50 pm

Oh my god, this information is gold!! Thank you sooo much for this excellent post!

#836 Comment By Toronto New Cars On September 19, 2010 @ 8:04 am

This is awesome but I can see how this can go sideways if you get carried away with deleting related links.

#837 Comment By Eurocar On September 19, 2010 @ 6:23 pm

Anything is doable with the right time commitment, but Wikipedia pages are so strong (as mentioned by other commenters here) that if you’re going to do this, you’d better be committed to putting in lots of time. Whether that time invested is worth it or not depends on the search term.

#838 Comment By Luis On September 20, 2010 @ 11:59 am

This is a very interesting post

#839 Comment By Jerry - Free Online Games On September 22, 2010 @ 12:31 pm

I haven’t even though about Wikipedia getting in the way before. It provides a good explanation on what to do if you do find yourself in that boat. I wouldn’t have even thought about those “work arounds” Thanks for posting this.

#840 Comment By Lj On September 25, 2010 @ 10:35 am

Wow what a sneaky way of gaining rank. Whatever works I guess.

#841 Comment By jani01 On September 27, 2010 @ 1:13 am

really nice and good post.

#842 Comment By Concursos Gratis On September 27, 2010 @ 11:59 am

Well, your conclusion is quite OK, but it’s really difficult to apply.

#843 Comment By mpu On September 27, 2010 @ 11:46 pm

That is a great idea and this information is gold

#844 Comment By Hedger On September 29, 2010 @ 3:24 am

I thought that a page from a Wikepedia is unbeatable. I’m so glad that I came into your blog by sharing it on the forum that you are actively participating.

#845 Comment By Hot dog On October 1, 2010 @ 5:11 pm

It sounds like mission impossible, but in theory it is possible to beat any site with the correct backlinks

#846 Comment By Neale On October 2, 2010 @ 5:53 pm

Excellent advice, its amazing that the best tips are always the simplest….

#847 Comment By Sohrweide Mpu On October 4, 2010 @ 2:00 am

Thank You For Excellent Amazing Information

#848 Comment By Sweaty Palms On October 4, 2010 @ 2:40 pm

Excellent advice, the theory is definitely workable, thanks a lot!

Harry

#849 Comment By mens ties On October 5, 2010 @ 5:00 am

I am sure this post has helped me save many hours of browsing other similar posts just to find what I was looking for. I just want to say: Thank you!

#850 Comment By Limo Service NJ On October 6, 2010 @ 9:33 pm

I agree, when it comes to wiki, there are so many links that pouring in from so many different sources it seems impossible, however those clever individuals will create a service or niche that would own even wiki.

[60] Limousine Service NJ

#851 Comment By Jules Rivera On October 9, 2010 @ 8:55 am

Thanks for sharing the info. I learned quite a lot.

#852 Comment By India Tour Packeges On October 9, 2010 @ 8:54 pm

I Hate the word “Waiting”

#853 Comment By RFID Tracking On October 10, 2010 @ 6:29 am

The most important thing is the quality of the backlinks.

#854 Comment By outreachideas On October 10, 2010 @ 11:45 pm

I agree with RFID Tracking. Quality of backlinks is really important.

#855 Comment By Warren Buffett On October 11, 2010 @ 4:40 pm

This is cool stuff Eli - people think life is easy when you’re a billionaire but being below Wikipedia for your own site is really annoying and the big G can’t be bribed or sweet-talked with my homespun wisdom and witty banter !

#856 Comment By unemployed loans On October 12, 2010 @ 6:09 am

I think, you should keep on updating of blue hat seo.

#857 Comment By utah dentist On October 14, 2010 @ 6:10 am

Yeah it sucks. Wikipedia being ahead of you in the rank really is a bummer. Hopefully search engines could do something about it :) cheers

#858 Comment By Koen On October 17, 2010 @ 1:53 pm

Hi there,

I completely agree about the Wikipedia problem. But you might try to drive traffic to your websites by creating back links on .gov sites.
Found recently a nice website with a lot of tips and tricks to drive this kind of traffic as a [61] traffic siphon to your website because these.gov site shave a high PR.
I tried it myself and it worked very well. Actually I was surprised.

Good luck and keep up the good work.

Koen

#859 Comment By Kepler On October 17, 2010 @ 5:36 pm

Great. Does it apply to various BIG sites too?

#860 Comment By poorfamilies On October 18, 2010 @ 4:45 am

You said so. Being outranked by wikipedia is just so ironic.

#861 Comment By Kaffeemagazin On October 18, 2010 @ 3:58 pm

Thanks for the share. In my experience, adding a huge volume of internal links all at once can trip a Google filter and make the page disappear from the SERP (at least for a little while).

#862 Comment By Poopy Peck On October 19, 2010 @ 4:18 pm

I really don’t know. I really don’t fuckin care either. What ever you guys think.

Cool with me :)

#863 Comment By wrist weights On October 19, 2010 @ 11:31 pm

I visited your blog for the first time and just been your fan. Keep posting as I am gonna come to read it everyday.thank you for your post

#864 Comment By Vision On October 21, 2010 @ 3:03 pm

Great review. Based upon your comments, I look forward to reading and seeing the information. Thank you for sharing your opinion of How To Overthrow A Wikipedia Result with us.

#865 Comment By Xbox 360 Slim On October 24, 2010 @ 1:55 pm

I’d never thought of targeting sites in this way. I’m going to give it a go. Thanks

#866 Comment By Chester On October 27, 2010 @ 9:53 am

Nice information mate ! Very usefull, i’m gonna try this right now. Check out my site ( penisenlargement44.com ) , it has a similar review.

#867 Comment By Headstones On October 27, 2010 @ 10:21 pm

Interesting comments, especially about getting into Wiki. Has anyone actually successfully tried this? Thoughts?

#868 Comment By SEO On October 29, 2010 @ 3:54 am

Does this really work, the theory is great. Will give it a go and post back.

#869 Comment By codigos para gta san andreas On October 30, 2010 @ 8:33 am

Nice info, thanks for sharing, I’ve been reading lots of your posts, and I strongly believe that you know really well about what you’re writing.

#870 Comment By Regnskabsservice On November 4, 2010 @ 5:39 am

No so sure about this, In the good old days it was all about the numbers, but even today numbers combined with anchor text still works really great

#871 Comment By Transfer a Car On November 5, 2010 @ 7:20 am

I continue to run into this problem as well. The domain authority is so high on wikipedia, but I think through intelligent backlinking I can knock them off the top spot.

#872 Comment By Day Care Killeen TX On November 8, 2010 @ 3:31 am

man, that is vicious stuff! …. but really cool :)

#873 Comment By Karla On November 14, 2010 @ 6:26 pm

Thanks for the very informative post of yours! I found it interesting one and give time to read it and I should say I really enjoyed it so much! This is always be a good tips for us bloggers who wants our site to be in the top rank! Thanks to you and looking forward to another great blog post! Keep sharing!!!

#874 Comment By Airsoft Gun On November 16, 2010 @ 12:40 am

i really like this blog coz it provides lots of useful information from different themes..thanks a lot !!!
[62] Airsoft

#875 Comment By Colon Diet On November 16, 2010 @ 3:17 am

I like it. I always think of them as an immovable force. Its nice to know they can be beaten.

[63] Question of the day

#876 Comment By Kate custom thesis On November 16, 2010 @ 10:17 am

yep, sometimes those Wikipedia page ranks can create a bit of trouble. Thanks for this piece of advice!)

#877 Comment By kostenlose Onlinespiele On November 17, 2010 @ 3:09 am

really great blog. More Infos please.

#878 Comment By Carport On November 18, 2010 @ 10:13 am

This has been very helpful indeed.

#879 Comment By Entertainment & Lifestyles On November 24, 2010 @ 7:02 am

Je voulais juste ajouter que ce n’est pas toujours la peine de s’inquiéter d’une annonce vôtre wiki abouve, surtout si votre vendre quelque chose que la plupart des gens reconnaissent wiki comme un site informatif et passer à l’annonce suivante dans le SERPS.

#880 Comment By Index of Flash Games On November 27, 2010 @ 1:07 pm

Thanks, very helpful!

#881 Comment By Chicago limousine service On November 30, 2010 @ 11:20 am

Although our [64] Chicago limo service doesn’t have to put up with competitors like Wikipedia, I still like the idea and I was wondering if will work with other types of websites.

#882 Comment By mpu On December 4, 2010 @ 6:45 am

Good going a little elbow grease paid off. Thanks for sharing

#883 Comment By กล้อง lomo On December 6, 2010 @ 7:32 am

Thanks for your post, info and hard work.

#884 Comment By Iron Man 2 On December 7, 2010 @ 7:54 pm

Great tips, does this really work?

#885 Comment By Web Design Company Australia On December 11, 2010 @ 12:05 am

Thank you very much for sharing knowledgeable article. Keep posting.

#886 Comment By Wireless Networking On December 17, 2010 @ 8:24 am

Great idea! I will definitely put this to use! thanks for sharing.

#887 Comment By apple world On December 17, 2010 @ 9:08 am

Thanks for your post, info and hard work.

#888 Comment By Maine SEO On December 17, 2010 @ 1:19 pm

I find it very difficult to outrank certain wikipedia pages in Google but others are very easy. It just takes time, slow and steady wins the race.

#889 Comment By Henri Payroll On December 25, 2010 @ 4:10 am

I wanted to thank you for this great read!! I definitely loved every little bit of it. I have bookmarked your site to check out the new stuff you post.

#890 Comment By abercrombie New York On December 27, 2010 @ 12:34 am

When you think of happy, unhappy or think of you when you smile in my mind wa

#891 Comment By شات كتابي On December 30, 2010 @ 7:00 am

Thanks for your post, info and hard work.

#892 Comment By hollister uk On December 31, 2010 @ 8:33 am

rrrrrrrrrrrrr

#893 Comment By Watch Live Cricket On December 31, 2010 @ 8:43 am

well thats an amazing SEO Promotion trick… well this will be really usefull

thanks a buch
___________________________________________________
[65] Watch Cricket Highlights

#894 Comment By filmindir On January 2, 2011 @ 1:03 pm

Dude Im trying to integrate AdSense with WordPress Difficult but it can be done

#895 Comment By online masters in education On January 3, 2011 @ 10:43 am

Thats actually pretty smart. Never thought about the see also’s. It always drives me nuts when wikipedia ranks in the top spot though with no back-links. They have such high domain trust.

#896 Comment By Cellulite Treatment NJ On January 4, 2011 @ 1:39 pm

I agree; it’s very smart. Thank you for sharing.

[66] Grow Tomatoes

#897 Comment By Just Zumba On January 8, 2011 @ 9:51 am

It seems interesting.Maybe I will try. Marketing is at last finding solutions.

#898 Comment By transport auto On January 8, 2011 @ 4:09 pm

Go back to reading Shoemoney, john chow, zach johnson, dave naylor etc. We’ll welcome you back when you get a bit more experience

#899 Comment By transport auto On January 8, 2011 @ 4:10 pm

WOW that a big statement to make. Wikipedia is one of the most authortiy websites on the internet. It could be possible to overturn the results but very hard.

#900 Comment By marketing engine search On January 8, 2011 @ 4:10 pm

It isn’t too hard to get above Wikipedia, our website has been above it for the term ‘web design’. As you say it does require a lot of work externally, but i would be careful about getting too many links from Wikepedia. It is highly thought of, but i don’t think it is always necessary for good Search Engine Optimisation.

#901 Comment By Singapore SEO Consultant On January 20, 2011 @ 10:12 am

Always a pleasure to be sitting on top of a wiki listing.

#902 Comment By agencias de emprego On January 24, 2011 @ 2:52 pm

agencias de emprego em curitiba, visitem nosso site

#903 Comment By Vince Samios On January 26, 2011 @ 7:37 am

sweet article, I’ve been using this strategy for over two years now.

#904 Comment By sohbet On January 30, 2011 @ 4:48 am

hi WOW that a big statement to make. Wikipedia is one of the most authortiy websites on the internet. It could be possible to overturn the results but very hard.

#905 Comment By Dodge Neon SRT4 On January 30, 2011 @ 5:40 am

Not at all. it wont blackhat your link.

#906 Comment By Søgemaskineoptimering On January 30, 2011 @ 12:38 pm

Is it just me, or is the wikipediea results getting weaker these days?

#907 Comment By Dodge Neon SRT4 On January 31, 2011 @ 5:20 am

Dont know. Probably the Author has done from self experience.

#908 Comment By online social work degree On January 31, 2011 @ 8:39 am

I have been running into this issue, Wikipedias domain strength is still beating out my site. I am going to try this tactic, it looks like it might work!

#909 Comment By Vince Samios On January 31, 2011 @ 9:23 am

In a commercial market wikipedia seems to be demoted slightly.

#910 Comment By Flight to Kathmandu On February 1, 2011 @ 11:42 pm

thanks for sharing this news of Wikipedia.

#911 Comment By Florists California On February 1, 2011 @ 11:45 pm

is the wikipediea results getting weaker these days?

[67] California Florists

#912 Comment By Calphalon contemporary On February 6, 2011 @ 8:53 am

Good. I do everything without Back hat SEO.

#913 Comment By physical therapy richmond virginia On February 7, 2011 @ 2:12 am

Great read. I would like to thank you for all of the good information. It is not easy to find good information these days.

#914 Comment By Como Sacar Abdominales On February 8, 2011 @ 7:33 am

Alwayss a pleasure to be sitting on top of a wiki listing.

#915 Comment By learn guitar tab On February 8, 2011 @ 4:16 pm

I like it. I think this very useful. Thank you!

#916 Comment By guns wallpapers On February 9, 2011 @ 12:46 am

There are certainly a lot of details like that to take into consideration. That is a great point to bring up. I offer the thoughts above as general inspiration!!

#917 Comment By Skinceuticals C E Ferulic On February 12, 2011 @ 11:20 pm

Thanks for new Idea. But i am not sure, i can make it.

#918 Comment By David Tennant On February 14, 2011 @ 6:01 pm

A true infiltrator. This should work. Wiki in not always true anyway.

#919 Comment By tappingworld On February 16, 2011 @ 8:41 pm

Amazing article. It’s bookmarked and saved. Wikipedia should fear this post. Thanks a lot. Time to remove some links:D

#920 Comment By tappingworld On February 16, 2011 @ 8:47 pm

I became a bluehatter too, inspired by this.

#921 Comment By Spin Bikes For Sale On February 19, 2011 @ 1:51 am

Never heard of blue hat echniques. Thanks for sharing i will give it a try

#922 Comment By Liberty Reserve On February 19, 2011 @ 6:11 am

Yes, you are right man.

#923 Comment By Liberty Reserve On February 19, 2011 @ 6:12 am

Hmm, great site is not a matter here.

#924 Comment By Liberty Reserve On February 19, 2011 @ 6:15 am

How, can you be certain?

#925 Comment By cctv installation On February 19, 2011 @ 5:42 pm

I am definitely going to give this a go, I think its really unfair how large sites like wikipedia can dominate the search engine results.

#926 Comment By cctv installers london On February 19, 2011 @ 6:42 pm

I hope this works I hate wikipedia.

#927 Comment By Extinguishers On February 20, 2011 @ 8:30 am

Nice idea, im going to give this a try. Never thought about attacking it from within. Ill put my wealth of external IP’s to good use.

#928 Comment By Perth Solar On February 21, 2011 @ 1:52 am

well i do not think it could be as easy to beat wikipedia :) as it has a lot of internal structure

#929 Comment By nokia themes On February 24, 2011 @ 11:24 am

I have found your blog in google I am very interested in

#930 Comment By Douglas On February 25, 2011 @ 8:34 pm

#931 Comment By Christian On February 28, 2011 @ 11:19 am

interesting post and still relevant. thumbs up!

#932 Comment By Pawn King On March 6, 2011 @ 6:48 pm

The printer friendly version has helped me a lot in reading your article. I rarely have time to read all the posts while I am at work so I just print it out and read it while I travel. :)

#933 Comment By SMSF On March 8, 2011 @ 4:11 am

I like it. I think this very useful. I am definitely going to give this a go

#934 Comment By best wireless printer On March 11, 2011 @ 9:02 am

let’s beat wikipedia. I often use also Yahoo Site explorer. It is very useful tools

#935 Comment By eurokody On March 14, 2011 @ 12:54 pm

Wikiepdia is king content!

#936 Comment By Stalowe Konstrukcje On March 14, 2011 @ 12:55 pm

I do agree with post.

#937 Comment By 10 day diet On March 16, 2011 @ 3:14 pm

Wow great article, I’m going to have to try this.

#938 Comment By Steve Maitland On March 17, 2011 @ 8:30 am

Great tip.can you use the same method on Ezine articles

#939 Comment By Alex On March 17, 2011 @ 2:43 pm

Try to use [69] http://accesschecker.com - check up to 100 sites for uptime with 1 click! If you own 100’s sites - it’s an absolute tool!

#940 Comment By electric On March 21, 2011 @ 11:03 am

Some of my sites have been able to overthrow wiki, others haven’t. I think there’s a degree of luck involved. On a separate note, why does Google rate Wiki so much? Anyone can edit it!?

Wikiepdia is king content! I do agree with post.

#941 Comment By ipad skins On March 21, 2011 @ 12:30 pm

Its easy to drop a link in wikipedia.

#942 Comment By ipad skins On March 21, 2011 @ 12:30 pm

great post indeed.

#943 Comment By ipad skins On March 21, 2011 @ 12:31 pm

nice article indeed.

#944 Comment By ipad skins On March 21, 2011 @ 12:31 pm

wikipedia blast is not a good.

#945 Comment By ipad skins On March 21, 2011 @ 12:32 pm

what is the confusion.

#946 Comment By ipad skins On March 21, 2011 @ 12:32 pm

yes, you are right.

#947 Comment By ipad skins On March 21, 2011 @ 12:34 pm

blacklist with google.

#948 Comment By ipad skins On March 21, 2011 @ 12:34 pm

no, it wont link.

#949 Comment By ipad skins On March 21, 2011 @ 12:35 pm

great man.

#950 Comment By ipad skins On March 21, 2011 @ 12:35 pm

no, it wont works.

#951 Comment By ipad skins On March 21, 2011 @ 12:36 pm

good backlinks from wikipedia.

#952 Comment By ipad skins On March 21, 2011 @ 12:37 pm

paid off little.

#953 Comment By ipad skins On March 21, 2011 @ 12:38 pm

no, i look backward.

#954 Comment By ipad skins On March 21, 2011 @ 12:38 pm

is it sorry.

#955 Comment By ipad skins On March 21, 2011 @ 12:39 pm

More good advice man.

#956 Comment By ipad skins On March 21, 2011 @ 12:40 pm

no man.

#957 Comment By ipad skins On March 21, 2011 @ 12:40 pm

yes, of course.

#958 Comment By ipad skins On March 21, 2011 @ 12:41 pm

wikipedia is great.

#959 Comment By ipad skins On March 21, 2011 @ 12:41 pm

no, is it not announced.

#960 Comment By ipad skins On March 21, 2011 @ 12:42 pm

is it link structure.

#961 Comment By ipad skins On March 21, 2011 @ 12:43 pm

yes, brilliant.

#962 Comment By ipad skins On March 21, 2011 @ 12:44 pm

cool spyglass tools.

#963 Comment By ipad skins On March 21, 2011 @ 12:45 pm

thanks explaination.

#964 Comment By ipad skins On March 21, 2011 @ 12:45 pm

wikipedia is special.

#965 Comment By ipad skins On March 21, 2011 @ 12:46 pm

nice solution.

#966 Comment By ipad skins On March 21, 2011 @ 12:46 pm

is it, that’s nice.

#967 Comment By CNA Board On March 27, 2011 @ 4:41 pm

Yes but there is no other way around it. Some people search for definitions, which Wiki has but not others.

#968 Comment By Kids Craft Videos On March 28, 2011 @ 7:49 am

This might have been mentioned already - I don’t know for sure because I haven’t read every single comment - but site explorer doesn’t seem to declare every single link to a page…

#969 Comment By Home Energy Monitor On March 30, 2011 @ 5:18 am

Although this is a very informative post I don’t think I would dare follow your method. Yes, people are saying that it is OK but…

#970 Comment By Joe P On March 30, 2011 @ 8:03 am

Wikipedia is just one of many authority sites that hard to overcome in the search engines. When I see multiples of these sites, I don’t even bother trying to rank.

#971 Comment By Paul Daniels On March 31, 2011 @ 4:36 pm

Thanks for the post, very helpful indeed!!

#972 Comment By Timothy On April 5, 2011 @ 11:43 am

Thanks for this article.
I like the concept of downranking Wiki, it just makes sense.

#973 Comment By MN DUI Lawyer On April 6, 2011 @ 11:05 am

Although this is a very informative post I don’t think I would dare follow your method. Yes, people are saying that it is OK but…

#974 Comment By Conservation Jobs On April 9, 2011 @ 8:50 am

Interesting tactics, I prefer just to concentrate on how to increase my own backlinks.

#975 Comment By Dennis M On April 20, 2011 @ 5:55 am

Awesome tips! I’ll def start using them. Do you guys have any advice for beating Wikihow, ehow, and the like? Because many of the kw’s in my niche have 1-4 of their pages ranking on page 1 of the search results and it annoys the crap out of me.

Plus, linking back on Wikihow doesn’t seem to be possible (did a quick scan and didn’t see an opportunity, so sue me if I’m wrong).

Any tips?

#976 Comment By Horadric Cube On April 24, 2011 @ 2:01 pm

Nice tips. Using them have really helped me! Keep advising!

#977 Comment By MPU Vorbereitung On April 24, 2011 @ 5:49 pm

I find that it’s easier in some markets than others to overthrow wikipedia. good tips, thanks!

#978 Comment By Life Writer Tamal On April 27, 2011 @ 7:31 am

I like it. I think this very useful. I am definitely going to give this a go

#979 Comment By Mustafa On April 30, 2011 @ 12:20 pm

great- I had already figured out the last part and discovered that you don’t need to take many links from the wiki page for it to drop. Mustafa from Granite Richmond

#980 Comment By Webinars Unleashed On May 1, 2011 @ 1:38 pm

Seems like a simple solution to a huge problem. Can’t wait to try it! Thanks!

#981 Comment By IMEI Unlock Code On May 3, 2011 @ 10:55 am

I must say, this was the same problem i had for a long time, but now i know how to do it, will try it soon.

#982 Comment By Brindes On May 5, 2011 @ 6:54 am

Interesting thing, i never fought that creepling an wikipedia entry would be that easy.

Another parte that i liked is about copying the pages where ur competitor are getting their juicy and putting a link of your own there.

That can be applied to anything :O

#983 Comment By Six Flags Great America Girl On May 5, 2011 @ 10:59 pm

Solid tipss, thanks for the great info.

#984 Comment By Bella Leslie On May 6, 2011 @ 3:52 pm

Good tip, i could do with your help. You free next week? :)

#985 Comment By porno On May 12, 2011 @ 8:50 am

I must say, this was the same problem

#986 Comment By waste king legend 8000 On May 13, 2011 @ 1:52 am

Since you have done it, I assumed your method is doable. There will be some people who think it is not legit and some who is willing to do it your way. Anyway, thanks for sharing your method and experience.

#987 Comment By Spielzeug On May 14, 2011 @ 8:10 am

I like, great Info! thanks for sharing!

#988 Comment By Brandon On May 16, 2011 @ 3:48 pm

This was the best movie that I have ever watched in my life!
I watched it on line at [70] The Blue Valentine and the picture was Crystal Clear!
I loved everything about the movie so please keep up the good work!
Thanks!

#989 Comment By abercrombie milano On May 16, 2011 @ 11:00 pm

oNice one, there is actually some good points on this blog some of my readers may find this useful, I must send a link, many thanks.

#990 Comment By abercrombie deutschland On May 17, 2011 @ 2:47 am

6Enjoyed reading this, very good stuff, thanks .

#991 Comment By lasik indianapolis On May 18, 2011 @ 2:58 pm

I have been looking for a resource like this, I owe ya one!

#992 Comment By Internet markedsføring On May 18, 2011 @ 11:58 pm

Awesome just what I was looking for..thanks.

#993 Comment By flash game On May 19, 2011 @ 8:17 am

i had heard about shoemoney and john chow those guys are really great.

#994 Comment By flash game On May 19, 2011 @ 8:20 am

oh yeah you are right wikipedia isn’t commercial site i don’t know whether it is possible or not.

#995 Comment By flash game On May 19, 2011 @ 8:26 am

i don’t think it will work it is just like impossible.

#996 Comment By gillette fusion proglide coupon On May 25, 2011 @ 7:02 pm

I will give this method a try…..

#997 Comment By More Control On May 26, 2011 @ 3:34 am

I had never had thought about going up against wikipedia to devalue its pages and links. Its an interesting concept. Once that I can see potential gains from, but one that may have certain risks attached to it.

#998 Comment By Dieet schema On May 27, 2011 @ 3:21 am

Very good post. I was struggling with my [71] dieet schema site in this matter. thanks to the tips i moved up. Thanks for sharing.

#999 Comment By Quitting weed On May 27, 2011 @ 3:23 am

Haha i’ve done it too with a site of my on [72] quitting weed. I don’t have a good result yet but i hope to beat it. Thanks.

#1000 Comment By Sarah On May 28, 2011 @ 5:41 am

Wt a fantastic article,actually I have done that too with my site [73] how to reduce thighs

#1001 Comment By HeRVy On May 30, 2011 @ 2:29 pm

Nice article by you definitely I’ll give it a try for our blog

#1002 Comment By HeRVy On May 30, 2011 @ 2:30 pm

Interesting tactics, I prefer just to concentrate on how to increase my own backlinks.

#1003 Comment By Denver IT Management On June 1, 2011 @ 1:51 pm

Good SEO tips! Glad to see someone can still produce quality SEO insight.

#1004 Comment By karen millen uk On June 1, 2011 @ 9:55 pm

You’re the best, thanks for the awesome article. I’m having troubles subscribing to your blogs feed. Thought I’d let you know.

#1005 Comment By SocietyM On June 2, 2011 @ 7:14 pm

@Author
i have heard of white and black SEO techniques. i have first heard of blue SEO technique here. thanks.

#1006 Comment By Panic Attack and Symptoms On June 4, 2011 @ 12:12 pm

Nice tips to overthrow wikipedia in number one rank.I’m going to try it. thanks for sharing your wisdom.

#1007 Comment By Stefan On June 5, 2011 @ 6:21 am

So apparently, adding links to Wikipedia didn’t get you banned. That would be ridiculous, as that would discourage ANY site from being in a Wikipedia entry. If no one wanted their site in a Wikipedia entry, Wikipedia would crash and burn, as they would no longer be seen as having thorough information as many of the links in Wikipedia are very relevant to the entry.

Stefan@[74] Jocuri

#1008 Comment By Word Templates On June 7, 2011 @ 4:36 am

No doubt this is great article and in my observation it is easy to drop a link in Wikipedia.thanks.

#1009 Comment By Word Templates On June 7, 2011 @ 4:39 am

I hope SocietyM now you will be understand and known about blue SEO technique..?

#1010 Comment By Mark On June 14, 2011 @ 9:58 am

Blue Hat? That’s a new one!

#1011 Comment By toyota racing On June 17, 2011 @ 5:28 am

Jane is not fun. I’m sure he will learn from reading this blog can not get blacklisted by the simple fact that suggests a link in wikipedia is not reliable.

#1012 Comment By Accessoires On June 19, 2011 @ 12:46 am

Ich mag deine Artikel, der einen guten Artikel ist Oh!

#1013 Comment By Property Management Software On June 19, 2011 @ 1:35 am

Hi,thanks for sharing the information here regarding to blue hat SEO tools. Really nice tools are provided by you and I would also try to apply these tools in my website.I think these tools will be very beneficial for my website.

#1014 Comment By ผ้าม่าน On June 20, 2011 @ 1:05 am

How to delete links to wiki?

#1015 Comment By Internet Marketing Tip On June 22, 2011 @ 7:45 am

Blue hat, nice idea about how to over throw wikipedia in search engine. It is also a nice idea to leave links in wikipedia, but i wonder is it legal to do that thing in wikipedia?

#1016 Comment By haberi On June 25, 2011 @ 2:32 am

Unfortunately wikipedia is now nofollow and it is not useful with google. But for yahoo and yandex hit it is still great want for link builders.

#1017 Comment By Recent Business News On June 25, 2011 @ 2:34 am

i am using it only for yahoo and yahoo hits increased very well.

#1018 Comment By mehdi On June 25, 2011 @ 2:36 am

wiki is the cleanlest website on net and i dont want to make some undelighted issue with it.

#1019 Comment By Home Online Work On July 4, 2011 @ 12:51 am

“Unfortunately wikipedia is now nofollow and it is not useful with google. But for yahoo and yandex hit it is still great want for link builders.”

Nofollow links still have some value.

#1020 Comment By CF Security Solutions On July 5, 2011 @ 2:25 pm

I really like wiki, its a fantastic resource.

#1021 Comment By Nicklaus Misiti On July 5, 2011 @ 11:22 pm

Why? What happen to those two guys? I heard that Shoemoney and John chow are great, then whats the problem?

#1022 Comment By Natasa Bekvalac On July 7, 2011 @ 4:18 am

A good team:)

#1023 Comment By Seo Expert On July 7, 2011 @ 8:02 pm

Amazing, I wonder how effective Wikipedia really is if this is how simple it is to enter anything you want.

#1024 Comment By Roger Cain On July 8, 2011 @ 10:18 am

The solution to my problems I hope, as I’m assuming it will work with other sites as well?

#1025 Comment By Robert Dorsey On July 9, 2011 @ 4:42 pm

Hey, just read your post on knocking out Wiki pages and found it interesting to say the least. I actually never thought of that before as I am still new to blogging for money, but I understand really good. Have you seen this site also? It is similar at ranking number on on first page of google. Although I haven’t tried Yahoo yet, it should work here too. [75] Go here to look at my blog. If there is anything I can help with feel free to contact me.

#1026 Comment By online fitness trainers On July 12, 2011 @ 11:18 pm

And I think, that with Wikipedia it is not necessary to struggle - senselessly. It is easier to make the ideal site on the necessary theme and to put on him the link with Wikipedia

#1027 Comment By pacquiao vs marquez On July 12, 2011 @ 11:22 pm

I’m assuming something is a little unclear here?

I see no reason why a site should be instantly banned from receiving a link from Wikipedia? If that was the case I’d be adding links from Wikipedia to all my competitors immediately.

#1028 Comment By Work Online On July 13, 2011 @ 4:21 am

Yeah i agree that its easy to drop a link in wikipedia.

#1029 Comment By Work Online On July 13, 2011 @ 4:21 am

I believe that Wikipedia can be much better source to find all needed information.

#1030 Comment By Infrared Home Diagnosis On July 14, 2011 @ 12:12 pm

Thanks for the info,

Some great SEO Tips

Cheers

#1031 Comment By AT&T Blackberry sim unlock code On July 15, 2011 @ 12:38 am

very interesting topic and nice explanation, but don’t the link from wikipedia is no follow? CMIIW. Which mean google will not count it.

#1032 Comment By Carport On July 18, 2011 @ 11:45 pm

is a fine blog. Greetings from Germany. Look a hear: [76] http://www.bruening-carport.de - Carports aus Holz from Germany. Thanks.

#1033 Comment By Romka On July 20, 2011 @ 10:19 pm

I did some seo for my site for a term “apartment ratings” it took me hundreds of good links to surpass wikipedia but i did that.

#1034 Comment By Jocuri cu Mario On July 24, 2011 @ 2:53 am

Great post, useful informations ! i really enjoy it.

#1035 Comment By masters in health administration On July 25, 2011 @ 6:25 pm

Great advice, never thought of those tactics, they probably work in healthcare too

#1036 Comment By officePROhub On July 25, 2011 @ 8:11 pm

You wouldn’t believe this but I have wasted all day looking for some information about this. You’re a lifesaver, it was an essential read and has helped me out no end.[77] officePROhub - Office Products and Services Directory

#1037 Comment By travelfromLA On July 26, 2011 @ 12:38 pm

great advice for companies that share the same name as a popular song or music artist

#1038 Comment By flyzapper On July 28, 2011 @ 8:56 pm

Hi, do you suggest that we can use wikipedia to gain links? Thanks.

#1039 Comment By Bespoke Kitchens On July 30, 2011 @ 7:20 am

I tried wikipedia and about ten minutes after adding a link it was gone.
So I don’t think it’s effective.

#1040 Comment By kurumsal promosyon On August 2, 2011 @ 5:14 am

I have read your article and its really useful for most of users like us. I have also bookmarked this blog and have shared it with my friends and colleagues.

#1041 Comment By Legal marketing On August 6, 2011 @ 12:44 pm

Please don’t be nasty to wikipaedia, it’s great !

#1042 Comment By Handbags On Sale On August 14, 2011 @ 6:36 pm

I do agree with all of the ideas you have presented in your post. They’re really convincing and will definitely work. Still, the posts are too short for newbies. Could you please extend them a bit from next time? Thanks for the post.

#1043 Comment By Learn How To Reduce Thighs On August 15, 2011 @ 1:28 am

Very interesting tactic. I think it might still be very difficult to outrank Wikipedia due to the number of links they have pointing to them. For some pages the number is so huge you have to use a software or something. Still nice tactic. I might try it out.

#1044 Comment By nj contractor On August 16, 2011 @ 1:02 pm

I have never been able to have a link stay on wikipedia. Is there a trick or something for this?

#1045 Comment By sarkari jobs On August 17, 2011 @ 1:25 am

hmm nice article wiki is just awesome completely agree

#1046 Comment By Business Templates On August 17, 2011 @ 1:57 am

I would like to appreciate you for sharing such a meaningful article.

#1047 Comment By rcking09 On August 28, 2011 @ 10:16 pm

Alot of the techniques he uses are blackhat. Using any blackhat technique is risky.

#1048 Comment By ASX Share Prices On August 30, 2011 @ 1:46 am

I’d always thought that Wikii were virtually unasailable when it comes to beating them on page rank. You live and learn !

#1049 Comment By William On September 7, 2011 @ 12:00 pm

Wikipedia is almost always the definition of quality..

#1050 Comment By VPS On September 10, 2011 @ 10:45 am

I think there are some terms where it is impossible to bet wikipedia, even in some of the esasy ones it takes 1000s of links to outrank.

Thanks for the post

#1051 Comment By Opi Axxium On September 11, 2011 @ 5:35 am

Really simple solution

Opi Axxium

#1052 Comment By bennamingo On September 12, 2011 @ 3:49 am

Wikipedia began as a complementary project for Nupedia, a free online English-language encyclopedia project whose articles were written by experts. It’s very important to all us because it gives us details about all topic we don’t know.Fast Fat Loss Diet

#1053 Comment By مدونة On September 13, 2011 @ 8:20 pm

it is important post
good

#1054 Comment By Robert On September 14, 2011 @ 5:01 pm

Great post, I mean Wikipedia pages are almost always at the top of search results!

#1055 Comment By Anthony On September 17, 2011 @ 5:45 am

will this actually work without being caught?

#1056 Comment By Pear On September 19, 2011 @ 4:02 am

Therefore seemingly, incorporating hyperlinks to be able to Wikipedia didn’to bring you restricted. That will be absurd, because that is going to warn ANY website coming from finding myself your Wikipedia access. In the event not a soul sought their site in a Wikipedia accessibility, Wikipedia might freeze along with melt off, as they quite simply would certainly not considered having thorough information numerous with the hyperlinks in Wikipedia are extremely tightly related to a admittance.

#1057 Comment By Eric Ellis On September 22, 2011 @ 10:10 pm

Great Post. I just found your website today. I recently created my first blog/website and am looking for any informational help I can get to boost my rankings. There is so much garbage out there that people sell you it’s a joy to discover a website with real techniques easily explained. Thank you!

#1058 Comment By Caldaie Vaillant On September 24, 2011 @ 6:37 am

I have been waiting for this kind for very long time

#1059 Comment By Solicitors Swansea On September 29, 2011 @ 10:59 am

yallah

#1060 Comment By ana maria On October 5, 2011 @ 3:34 am

nice post thanks for the sharing its helpful [78] telefonski sex

#1061 Comment By Alcoholic On October 5, 2011 @ 6:46 am

Yeah, it won’t get you blacklisted if you do it subtley, (if that even is a word?)

#1062 Comment By technical support On October 8, 2011 @ 5:04 am

Nice article! shows a lot of research. [79] online technical support

#1063 Comment By Pacquiao vs Marquez On October 11, 2011 @ 8:16 am

It is just so hard to overthrow wikipedia. I hate it when it ranks higher than my site even though its content is very small. Thanks for the tips, I’ll try them.

#1064 Comment By Pacquiao vs Marquez Streaming On October 12, 2011 @ 7:58 am

Right. it sucks but its true.

#1065 Comment By Property Marbella On October 13, 2011 @ 9:55 am

Is there seriously a Wikipedia blacklist that is shared with Google? I’ve never heard of this.

#1066 Comment By Balenciaga Handbags Shop On October 19, 2011 @ 2:46 am

Balenciaga Handbags Shophdfg

#1067 Comment By Pacquaio vs Marquez Live Stream On October 20, 2011 @ 4:08 am

really nice to see this one.

#1068 Comment By Watch Pacquaio vs Marquez Online On October 20, 2011 @ 4:08 am

yehey!!! thanks for this one!!!

#1069 Comment By Watch Pacquaio vs Marquez Online On October 20, 2011 @ 4:09 am

Can’t wait for tis one

#1070 Comment By seo companies manchester On November 1, 2011 @ 3:46 am

great insight, thanks for sharing your knowledge :)

#1071 Comment By carpet cleaners manchester On November 1, 2011 @ 3:48 am

Brilliant information, i have book marked this blog and will be back.

#1072 Comment By boot camps manchester On November 1, 2011 @ 3:50 am

Wikipedia is a great site that has a lot of authority, it’s only right that have decision makers when it comes to pointing out links.

#1073 Comment By skip hire stockport On November 1, 2011 @ 3:53 am

I wonder if people actually offer to pay to get on wikipedia?

#1074 Comment By kalma tayba wallpaper On November 1, 2011 @ 9:34 am

nice post, i got some important information form this post.

Thanks for sharing such kind a nice post.

#1075 Comment By Coops On November 2, 2011 @ 5:13 pm

Wow sure are a lot of mean spirited remarks

#1076 Comment By pacquiao vs marquez 3 On November 11, 2011 @ 6:03 am

your blog is really amazing……..

#1077 Comment By chaussures air max On November 11, 2011 @ 8:38 pm

choix vaste de lignes de vêtements pour enfants, y compris les chaussures, et pour la fin, une bonne price.

#1078 Comment By F4r On November 15, 2011 @ 8:43 pm

Thx for the nice article!
I enjoyed reading it. Looks like a lot of work but i think it will show success.

#1079 Comment By Atolye 2B Resim Kursu On November 18, 2011 @ 1:48 pm

Great article.Thank you.

#1080 Comment By snel vermageren On November 19, 2011 @ 10:33 am

Wilt u snel vermageren plus gezond blijven wilt u voor dat u op vakantie gaat een strake buik hebben ik verklap deze week 5 tips hoe je gezond kan vermageren[80] Snel vermageren

#1081 Comment By Ritesh On November 19, 2011 @ 12:57 pm

#1082 Comment By Venta de Computadoras On November 21, 2011 @ 9:11 am

It’s a very interesting technique, I honestly thought that Wikipedia could not be defeated in the results it is usually seen first. I’ll try the advice to see how it works.

#1083 Comment By Vermoeidheid On November 22, 2011 @ 3:19 am

getting a link from Wikipedia and uour domain is banned within a couple of hours ???? So if I want to crash my competition, I just need to get thel into Wikipedia? I don’t think so.

#1084 Comment By Maigrir On November 22, 2011 @ 3:22 am

I don’t see how you get a good return of investment of your time in doing point 3.

#1085 Comment By watch cotto vs margarito 2 On November 24, 2011 @ 10:04 pm

Thanks for sharing’ nice info [82] cotto vs margarito 2 live stream

#1086 Comment By Microsoft Office 2010 On November 25, 2011 @ 8:14 pm

This article is GREAT it can be EXCELLENT JOB and what a great tool!

#1087 Comment By Diseño web y vídeo Madrid On December 3, 2011 @ 9:20 am

Excellent article.
Congratulations

#1088 Comment By Floyd Mayweather vs Manny Pacquiao On December 4, 2011 @ 5:30 pm

’s all Klitschko vs Mormeck ratings. You really think Klitschko vs Mormeck Live matter Manny Pa

#1089 Comment By iPhone 5 Games On December 4, 2011 @ 5:38 pm

k kicked off London Olympic 2012 night, and was London Olympic Games 2012 to take at face Man utd vs Man City , given the Olympiad London 2012 of the past few Oscar Academy Awards 2012

#1090 Comment By Mayweather vs khan On December 4, 2011 @ 5:38 pm

ke when he Donaire vs Vazquez home to find Donaire vs Vazquez Live doing nude Khan vs Mayweather with a The Floyd Mayweather vs Amir Khan funnyman who America amir khan vs may

#1091 Comment By Pacquiao vs Bradley On December 4, 2011 @ 5:39 pm

Mayweather vs khan specials and mayweather vs khan tickets inAugust by Pacquiao vs Bradley uproarious Donaire vs Vazquez on Comedy Centra Pacquiao vs Bradley Live dude of Charlie Sh

#1092 Comment By Khan vs Mayweather On December 4, 2011 @ 5:40 pm

er en I see a # Pacquiao vs Mayweather Fight room, it literally ruins my Pacquiao vs Mayweather Live ,”

#1093 Comment By Pacquiao vs Mayweather On December 4, 2011 @ 5:41 pm

e’s Mayweather vs Pacquiao HBO 24/7 a slob.” thing Pacquiao vs Mayweather found they were Mayweather vs Pacquiao 24/7 before they or read ANY Pacquiao vs Mayweather . You Pacquiao vs Mayweather Live think do Pacquiao vs Mayweather FIGHT HBO the

#1094 Comment By cctv installers london On December 8, 2011 @ 4:41 pm

Lol great post mate really enjoyed it

#1095 Comment By Marketing Potter On December 11, 2011 @ 12:35 am

Just encountered you post - and se it has several years behind. Has is changed or will it still work this way?

I’d always thought that Wikii were virtually unasailable when it comes to beating them on page rank. You live and learn !

#1096 Comment By شات مصرى On December 19, 2011 @ 2:30 am

ty fpr uys

#1097 Comment By شات صوتي On December 19, 2011 @ 2:36 am

okkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk

#1098 Comment By سعودي انحراف On December 20, 2011 @ 12:55 am

yesssssssssssssssssssssssssssss

#1099 Comment By Nitish On December 21, 2011 @ 9:51 am

Who are they?

#1100 Comment By Nitish On December 21, 2011 @ 9:57 am

I’ll second that V_v

#1101 Comment By Moncler On December 21, 2011 @ 8:15 pm

asdfsad

#1102 Comment By شات On December 25, 2011 @ 5:17 am

nawaffff

#1103 Comment By شات كتابي On December 25, 2011 @ 5:36 am

ok

#1104 Comment By Divya @ Life Insurance Policies On December 25, 2011 @ 9:43 pm

wikipedia has always giving best results.

#1105 Comment By Summer Holidays On January 1, 2012 @ 8:47 pm

Hello to all! I think Eli’s synopsis of the seo empire was a great one, and appreciate his willingness to share. I wish there was more info related. Thanks anyway.

#1106 Comment By PCSO Lotto Results Phil On January 2, 2012 @ 1:01 am

The most valuable piece of advice is right up front, in the first few lines. Greatness is here!

#1107 Comment By Mobile Laptop On January 2, 2012 @ 6:17 pm

Wonderful Eli, thank you, I learned a lot of new things. More power to You!

#1108 Comment By Odzyskiwanie danych On January 5, 2012 @ 12:50 pm

Hi
If Yahoo site explorer does not exist what tool can we use

#1109 Comment By Ismat Zahra On January 6, 2012 @ 1:24 pm

helloo ody :)

#1110 Comment By Ismat Zahra On January 6, 2012 @ 1:25 pm

sorry i have no idea about that :S

#1111 Comment By Intel Core On January 6, 2012 @ 10:02 pm

Great idea. Now that’s good thinking.

#1112 Comment By Ismat Zahra On January 7, 2012 @ 11:07 am

evening guyz

#1113 Comment By Ismat Zahra On January 7, 2012 @ 11:10 am

soo guyz any thing new now??

#1114 Comment By Ismat Zahra On January 7, 2012 @ 11:11 am

and plz tell me some releted articlz of it

#1115 Comment By Ismat Zahra On January 7, 2012 @ 11:13 am

anyone there #77 :S

#1116 Comment By Asian wedding videos On January 9, 2012 @ 3:12 am

Baldung used paintings for his art. He used wood work to do his work. He was so skilled and was thought to be the best student of Albrecht Dürer.

#1117 Comment By Hot Pinoy Celebs On January 11, 2012 @ 3:47 am

I am so glad I was able to come across this site.

#1118 Comment By Bo On January 11, 2012 @ 11:28 am

This is actually the kind of information I’ve been trying to find. Thanks for posting this information.

Thanks

#1119 Comment By The Christian Identity Forum On January 18, 2012 @ 1:34 am

Sensational article!

I’d always thought that I’d never be able to knock Wikipedia off its perch in relation to its ranking number one for the main search term for which my website is ranked. But now I see a bright, shining ray of hope. I’ll be taking advantage of these techniques quick-smart, I can promise you that.

#1120 Comment By Faith - Appetite Suppressant On January 25, 2012 @ 4:05 am

I dont think you need to remove links to a Wiki page but if it works for you go for it :)

#1121 Comment By customer retention programs On January 29, 2012 @ 10:16 pm

thank you for sharing these tips with us. I haven’t been using wikipedia much lately, it makes me wonder if I’ve slowed down on my researching??? Hmmm….

#1122 Comment By americki plakari On February 3, 2012 @ 7:50 am

Good Post! I agree your post but i feel point 4 is difficult to understand for me.otherwise the story is excellent.I really love it.
Thank for your post

#1123 Comment By klizni plakari On February 3, 2012 @ 7:52 am

This is a good post, indeed a great job. You must have done good research for the work, i appreciate your efforts. Looking for more updates from your side.

#1124 Comment By Keith On February 14, 2012 @ 11:51 pm

Its nice to have knowledge like this but i’m not sure if I would ever have the balls to put in in action!

#1125 Comment By Rados P On February 24, 2012 @ 2:32 am

I managed to outrank wikipedia in some niches, but I failed in others. But it’s a good idea to try to put link to our site on the wikipedia site. Of course it’s likely to be removed.. but we can try.

#1126 Comment By Venta de Computadoras On February 25, 2012 @ 8:49 am

It is usually very difficult to beat in positions to Wikipedia but not impossible, advice you give in your article are very good and because we have to put them into practice.

#1127 Comment By Classificados On March 6, 2012 @ 2:16 pm

Very interesting article, thanks for sharing this with us. hugs

#1128 Comment By Crafts Factory On March 11, 2012 @ 3:07 am

Its nice to have knowledge like this but i’m not sure if I would ever have the balls to put in in action!

#1129 Comment By Kangei Koi Club On March 14, 2012 @ 10:31 am

Nice points well done. thanks for sharing.

#1130 Comment By Sarkari Naukri On March 16, 2012 @ 4:18 am

I think there are some terms where it is impossible to bet wikipedia, even in some of the esasy ones it takes 1000s of links to outrank.

Thanks for the post

#1131 Comment By Martin Lange On March 19, 2012 @ 4:53 am

Thumbs up :) ! Very interesting article! Thanks for sharing!

#1132 Comment By HealthWrong On March 20, 2012 @ 9:14 pm

wikipedia should be overthrown. dominated the google results for so long.

#1133 Comment By Nike TN On March 23, 2012 @ 1:29 am

Le Nike Diffusé Max chaussure utilise une Nike Air Max grand élément de l’air amorti au Foot Locker. Qu’est-ce pour Nike avec un peu plus, une influence, maintenant d’abord nous savons tous que cette année est la Nike Air Max 90 que la plupart des ces Nike Air max 90 chaussures seront Aoet ou Septembre de cette année étaient en vente au niveau du talon qui est évidente dans appele Il semble que cette nike air max année Nike Air Max chaussures arevisible à travers la base de la semelle intermédiaire dans de nombreux petits cercles sur la semelle de la chaussure, “Total Aire, qui est essentiellement un autre mot pour cette tendance dans le domaine des nike shoes de course et ont des “trous” dans l’élément de rembourrage Et pourquoi parmi tant de modèles Air Max) et un autre nike air Yeezy chaussures mode de coussins d’air est le profil bas et très sensible “Zoom Air.”

#1134 Comment By First aid training London On March 24, 2012 @ 8:25 am

Blue hat SEO. never heard of it.

#1135 Comment By First aid training Manchester On March 24, 2012 @ 8:26 am

Will check it out though

#1136 Comment By Annette On March 31, 2012 @ 2:16 am

Thnaks for the tipp, Wiki can be quite annoying sometimes but with this strategy it should be possible to beat them in the serps.

#1137 Comment By TN Pas Cher On April 1, 2012 @ 11:51 pm

vhj

#1138 Comment By Web Design On April 4, 2012 @ 6:06 am

They are some pretty sneaky ideas. Wikipedia also benefits from having strong brand signals. More and more websites rank for keywords if the homepage is linked to using their brand name. It’s expected than in 2012 anchor text will play less of a role and branding more.

#1139 Comment By Dollarsempire On April 5, 2012 @ 2:05 am

I’ve seen pages outrank wikipedia too. But if I have to do it that might take a bit of time. Some topics are relatively easier than others.
In my case I’m having a wiki page for one of my niche site too.

#1140 Comment By Life Insurance Over 85 Years Old On April 5, 2012 @ 5:20 pm

i suspect somehow or rather, wikipedia is affiliated with the big G.

#1141 Comment By Justbeenpaid On April 9, 2012 @ 1:03 pm

Wow!
That’s sound interesting.
I would definitely like to try it one day
Thank Eli

#1142 Comment By misra On April 25, 2012 @ 8:30 am

thank you for sharing these tips with us. I haven’t been using wikipedia much lately, it makes me wonder if I’ve slowed down on my researching???

#1143 Comment By Silky On May 8, 2012 @ 9:30 am

I second that thank you, misra.

#1144 Comment By hosting reviews On June 16, 2012 @ 11:43 am

Wikipedia doesn’t also have accurate information on them. And sometimes when you edit their info., it gets erased by others. It can be so annoying.

#1145 Comment By www.justbeenpaidfraud.com On June 18, 2012 @ 8:11 am

Thank you for this great advice
Wikipedia are like monsters so hard to beat
I will give it a try

#1146 Comment By kitesurf school On June 19, 2012 @ 11:24 am

some useful info, thanks. Been playing with Wiki for a while.

#1147 Comment By First aid training chester On June 24, 2012 @ 4:47 am

Seems like a reasonable strategy.

#1148 Comment By Planetary Mixer On June 28, 2012 @ 8:48 pm

Through continuous Planetary Mixer and development in domestic, the filling machine production line manufacturing technology and equipment is no stranger to the major industry user enterprises, because of their special works, the production line either Cone Sand Mills from raw materials into packaging equipment, processed, route of transportation, assembly, inspection, and a series of Dissolver activities.

#1149 Comment By Catering On July 5, 2012 @ 1:03 pm

Thanks for a really great post, seems like a good strategy.

#1150 Comment By Aprel Atkins @MalwareSecure Anti-Virus On July 13, 2012 @ 10:26 pm

I haven’t tried this yet but I certainly will. Thank you for this information. This is very much appreciated. Keep it up!

#1151 Comment By Divya @ Online Auto Advisor On July 17, 2012 @ 6:05 am

This political situation had resulted from the so-called 1887 Bayonet Constitution. The conspirators’ stated goals were to depose the queen, overthrow

#1152 Comment By ben 10 On July 20, 2012 @ 8:14 am

We’ll welcome you back when you get a bit more experience.

#1153 Comment By buffalo graphic design On August 5, 2012 @ 11:14 pm

great trick but it get deleted by the mods when i attempt o add links

#1154 Comment By Patrick On August 6, 2012 @ 12:41 am

Oh, yeah. This is what I need, I also have trouble in dropping the Wikipage down for continuing moving up. I should try your solution. thanks you so much for such helpful article.

#1155 Comment By mobile phones in india On August 7, 2012 @ 10:44 pm

great this is really nice post … that is all we want .

#1156 Comment By Overzetdaken On August 11, 2012 @ 5:34 am

Love to read more about this

#1157 Comment By AP Chapewerken On August 11, 2012 @ 6:10 am

Any idea where i can find more stuff like this? [83] Chapper Limburg

#1158 Comment By Zwembaden Aqua Pura On August 11, 2012 @ 6:57 am

Very entertaining and usefull article. Thanks.
[84] Aanleggen zwembad

#1159 Comment By http://www.seozoekmachineoptimalisatie.be/ On August 11, 2012 @ 7:23 am

Wikipedia is such a powerfull medium to get in touch with knowledge. [85] Logo ontwerpen

#1160 Comment By Pleisterwerk On August 11, 2012 @ 10:52 am

Wikipedia is notorious competitor in SEO and one of Google favourite websites. [86] Pleisterwerken prijs

#1161 Comment By http://www.apchapewerken.be/vloerisolatie_isolatie_vloer_isoleren/pur_vloerisolatie_pur/ On August 17, 2012 @ 3:48 am

Wikipedia is great source for knwoledge and resoures.
[87] Pur vloerisolatie

#1162 Comment By Communication management On August 17, 2012 @ 11:57 pm

Wikipedia is providing a precise definition/knowledge of the any topic.

#1163 Comment By Time and Attendence On August 20, 2012 @ 5:07 am

Hey i agree with your points. These are the best points I ever seen. Keep updating like this

#1164 Comment By Yahoo Top Spot On August 20, 2012 @ 5:38 pm

Thanks for magnificent info I was looking for this information for my mission. I needs to spend some time learning more or understanding more.

#1165 Comment By Jasmine @ Callme.lk On August 20, 2012 @ 11:55 pm

Very nice guide! You should really post more of these guides. Gonna read more of you in the future.

#1166 Comment By Alex On August 21, 2012 @ 4:13 am

Great article - thanks a lot!

#1167 Comment By security guard resume On August 22, 2012 @ 3:37 am

Simply a great piece of work.

#1168 Comment By Time and Attendence On August 24, 2012 @ 11:47 pm

Thanks so much for giving everyone a very special opportunity to read articles and blog posts from this website. I’m so actually fascinated with the terrific creative ideas served by you. Certain 3 facts in this post are undoubtedly the simplest we’ve ever had.

#1169 Comment By Ian Achacoso On August 27, 2012 @ 9:01 am

Really fantastic article on [88] Search Engine like the one I saw, it’s similar to yours.

#1170 Comment By SEO Melbourne FL On August 27, 2012 @ 9:27 am

Awesome analysis here, thanks for your experiment and sharing your insight with other SEO’s out there.

#1171 Comment By sylvana On August 28, 2012 @ 2:48 pm

This was very helpful, please don’t take it away. Thank you for your time spent on this, you are [89] very smart and considerate. God Bless you and yours.

#1172 Comment By graphic artist buffalo On August 30, 2012 @ 12:00 am

neat trick to fool wikipedia

#1173 Comment By Dakwerken Limburg On August 31, 2012 @ 12:32 am

Any more intel on this subject on the net?
[90] http://www.superdak.be/dakrenovatie-renovatie-dak-renoveren/

#1174 Comment By Dakwerker Limburg On August 31, 2012 @ 12:33 am

I’d like to know more about htis subject. any recommendations.
[91] Dak vernieuwen

#1175 Comment By Dakwerker Limburg On August 31, 2012 @ 12:35 am

This has been an excellent tribute to Wikipedai. Thanks.
[92] Dakrenovatie

#1176 Comment By hut be phot On September 2, 2012 @ 3:24 am

Thanks. It is very useful

#1177 Comment By thong cong On September 2, 2012 @ 8:31 pm

True i agree with you, we should not offending the newbies. Great articles el

#1178 Comment By Rich On September 4, 2012 @ 6:53 pm

Wow, this is some great information! I can use these techniques for a couple of websites I manage… thanks for the tips!

#1179 Comment By berni On September 8, 2012 @ 7:03 pm

Just thought I’d share a bit of info on a SEO software that will definitely help with your ranking on google’s page one, check out the review[93] seosoftware

#1180 Comment By Hot Work Passport On September 9, 2012 @ 6:01 am

Interesting article. Could be a time consuming process. But you have to put the hard work in.

#1181 Comment By Victor On September 12, 2012 @ 8:53 pm

I often use wikipedia. Thanks for your tips, I learned a lot of new thing.

#1182 Comment By thiet bi lanh On September 13, 2012 @ 2:02 am

Woa blue hat SEO.
I like this news
Thanks you so much

#1183 Comment By Stine On September 19, 2012 @ 12:29 pm

Good - but is this relevant after penguin and all the other updates - I feel I am out in some deep water here - all that used to work is not really working so well any longer……

#1184 Comment By Jasmine @ Callme.lk On September 24, 2012 @ 5:07 am

Great article eli. I have never really been sure on white and black hat techniques since i am fairly new to this but this explained alot to me

#1185 Comment By history of the stork club On September 26, 2012 @ 10:51 pm

such a neat trick to overthrow wiki results..thanks for sharing

#1186 Comment By Matt Wagner On September 27, 2012 @ 11:43 pm

This is nice you have wonderful knowledge your explaining way is very nice and descriptive.I am so happy to read this and gain some knowledge and i will come back your this blog again and again when i face some questions.

#1187 Comment By Striptease Angelina On October 5, 2012 @ 2:53 am

There are more than one simularities with the work i did in this subject. Well done! [94] Seo

#1188 Comment By Striptease Angelina Striptease On October 5, 2012 @ 2:54 am

Have you published more on this subject on your blog here somewhere? [95] Seo Sempris

#1189 Comment By Sempris zoekmachine optimalisatie & seo On October 5, 2012 @ 8:59 am

If you ever need some assistance for your blog just let us know. [96] Limburg webdesign

#1190 Comment By Sempris seo & zoekmachine optimalisatie On October 5, 2012 @ 9:04 am

We really appreciate your efforts. [97] Webdesign & Seo

#1191 Comment By munna On October 11, 2012 @ 3:45 am

Hi

we have PowerMta Video tutorial in this we cover these topics

The topics which we covered in this video tutorial
• Introduction of Power MTA
• Installing PowerMTA
• License Activation
• Installing and configuring DNS
• Features of PowerMTA
• Configuring Virtual-MTA
• Max-message-rate
• Max-message-per-connection
• Define bounce after
• Define Retry Domain on particular time period
• Giving access on web for monitoring purpose
• Define HTTP management Port
• Configure SMTP username and password
• Configure SMTP port
• Increase PowerMTA queues
• Reload PowerMTA configuration file
• How to debug PowerMTA
• Generate SPF and DKIM
• Publish SPF and DKIM on DNS
• Define DKIM on PowerMTA
• How to connect Interspire applications or other application
• Start, Pause and delete queue on PowerMTA
• Delete particular queue on PowerMTA
• Checking powerMTA log
• How to check IP and Domain blacklist
• Delist your IP And domain

for more info mail me: [98] [email protected]

#1192 Comment By Womens French Cuff Shirts On October 11, 2012 @ 3:50 am

Awesome post I am glad to see your nice and ver informative post.

#1193 Comment By First Aid Courses Nottingham On October 12, 2012 @ 2:18 am

Nice article and I have tried the processes on my own website. Anything is achievable on the internet

#1194 Comment By Web Design Liverpool On October 12, 2012 @ 2:22 am

Interesting information and will make note of this if I ever need to get off Wikipedia!

#1195 Comment By اغلفة فيس بوك On October 13, 2012 @ 1:16 pm

Most backlinks to wikipedia are built into webpages and not actually in blogs and forums so editing can be difficult. Overcoming wiki on keywords is hard but do able, just not this way.

#1196 Comment By chong tham dot On October 13, 2012 @ 7:55 pm

I wonder how many of commentators read actual post.


Article printed from Blue Hat SEO-Advanced SEO Tactics: http://www.BlueHatSEO.com

URL to article: http://www.BlueHatSEO.com/how-to-overthrow-a-wikipedia-result/

URLs in this post:
[1] Wikidnapping: http://www.metroseo.com/2007/08/19/wiki-dnapping/
[2] wrote an article: http://www.BlueHatSEO.comwww.seomoz.org/blog/whiteboard-friday-wikiwikiwiki-whack
[3] wiki whack: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/whiteboard-friday-wikiwikiwiki-whack
[4] http://www.togaac.com/2008/11/25/trick-to-get-google-authority/: http://www.togaac.com/2008/11/25/trick-to-get-google-authority/
[5] Angela from Aberdeen: http://angelasdiscountmarket.com/angela.html
[6] Backlinks: http://www.goarticles.com/cgi-bin/showa.cgi?C=1151743
[7] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annual_report: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annual_report
[8] personal checks: http://www.4cheapchecks.com
[9] Granite Headstones: http://www.headstonesandmemorials.com
[10] Surveys4checks: http://www.jerryreviews.com/Survey4Checks.html
[11] http://www.nabble.com/How-to-sabotage-Wikipedia,-for-SEO-spammers-td20702972.html: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-sabotage-Wikipedia,-for-SEO-spammers-td20702972.html
[12] gold secrets: http://www.squidoo.com/Gold_Secrets_Guide
[13] Free Pc Freeware: http://www.pcfreeware.info
[14] Dazzle White: http://www.goarticles.com/cgi-bin/showa.cgi?C=1779845
[15] how to get a girl to like you: http://www.goarticles.com/cgi-bin/showa.cgi?C=1758730
[16] Shoulder: http://www.shouldernerve.com
[17] - Mr bathroom furniture: http://www.paramountbathrooms.co.uk
[18] Hot Dog Carts for Sale: http://www.hotdogcartsforsale.net
[19] Kitesurfing Lessons South East: http://www.thekitesurfcentre.com
[20] LOL@Hilary: http://www.BlueHatSEO.commailto:LOL@Hilary
[21] SEO Consultant: http://www.seomomo.com
[22] Will Google’s Caffeine disrupt search rankings?: http://techfrog.org/will-googles-caffeine-disrupt-search-rankings/
[23] Tech Frog: http://techfrog.org/
[24] Coffee Grinder Reviews: http://www.CoffeeGrindersReviews.com/
[25] Boys Water Shoes: http://www.kids-water-shoes-online.com/boys_water_shoes.html
[26] Jacket Shopping: http://jacketshopping.com
[27] Super Weight Loss Plans : http://www.superweightlossplans.com
[28] The All Health Blog : http://www.asinsindhi.com
[29] Business Websites: http://www.freewebsitegiveaways.com
[30] Bahia Feliz: http://www.bluecanaria.com/bahia-feliz.html
[31] Driver Detective: http://www.driversoftwareupdate.com/reviews/driverdetective/
[32] Discount Cabinets: http://www.thertastore.com/
[33] jump higher: http://www.increaseyourverticalhq.com
[34] Admin Support: http://webprocreation.net
[35] Garmin Rino GPS: http://www.garminrinogps.com
[36] Juicy Couture: http://www.eapparelstore.com/juicy-couture-handbags-c-74_88.html
[37] Father of the bride speeches: http://www.sample-wedding-speech.com/father-of-the-bride-speeches-sample/
[38] Simon: http://www.BlueHatSEO.com”http://bestbusinessangels.com”
[39] NoteBook Air Free!! claim yours now: http://www.NoteBookAir.net
[40] jdm: http://www.jshmotors.com
[41] How to grow mushrooms: http://www.learnhowtogrowmushrooms.com
[42] Wine Aerator: http://wineaeratorinfo.com/
[43] pandora charm bracelets: http://pandora-charmbracelets.blogspot.com
[44] ladies perfumes: http://ladies-perfumes.blogspot.com
[45] Boudoir photography Orlando: http://www.yaeko-boudoir.com/orlando-intimate-photos.html
[46] watch weeds: http://watch-weedsonline.com
[47] Naples lawn care: http://www.mowplus.com
[48] sunglasses: http://www.replica-wholesale-sunglasses.com/
[49] Laid Off : http://americalaidoff.com
[50] stop smoking weed: http://stop-smoking-weed.org
[51] Dallas Auto Insurance: http://dallas-autoinsurance.info
[52] http://www.binaryburn.com: http://www.binaryburn.com
[53] Popcorn Machine Cart: http://popcornmachinecart.info
[54] http://www.powderdust.dk: http://www.powderdust.dk
[55] Junk silver: http://www.silver-bullion.info/Junk_silver_coins
[56] Relativity Ratio: http://2divineways.com
[57] Luxury Perfume: http://www.tokoparfumonline.com
[58] Dog Illness Diagnosis: http://www.dogillnessdiagnosis.net
[59] seo firm: http://www.webimax.com
[60] Limousine Service NJ: http://www.ablelimo.net/
[61] traffic siphon: http://www.trafficsiphonnow.com
[62] Airsoft: http://www.monsterairsoftusa.com
[63] Question of the day: http://www.raisingthequestion.com
[64] Chicago limo service: http://www.echolimousine.com
[65] Watch Cricket Highlights: http://www.360cricket.com/cricket-highlights/
[66] Grow Tomatoes: http://www.togrowtomatoes.com
[67] California Florists: http://www.floristinca.com
[68] Google Sniper Method: http://googlesnipernews.net
[69] http://accesschecker.com: http://accesschecker.com
[70] The Blue Valentine: http://www.streamingdirect.org/2011/05/watch-blue-valentine-online_15.html
[71] dieet schema: http://www.bestedieetplan.com/
[72] quitting weed: http://www.quitting-weed.net/
[73] how to reduce thighs: http://www.tipsreducethighs.com/
[74] Jocuri: http://www.cujocuri.com/
[75] Go here to look: http://googlesniperguru.com
[76] http://www.bruening-carport.de: http://www.bruening-carport.de
[77] officePROhub: http://www.officeprohub.com/
[78] telefonski sex: http://www.telefonskisex.rs
[79] online technical support: http://geek-assist.com
[80] Snel vermageren: http://www.snel-vermageren.nl
[81] Do follow list PR 7 Blogs SEO: http://www.techinspiro.blogspot.com
[82] cotto vs margarito 2 live stream: http://www.clarencehub.info/cottovsmargarito2livestream/
[83] Chapper Limburg: http://www.apchapewerken.be/chapewerken_limburg_chape_werken/
[84] Aanleggen zwembad: http://www.aquapura.be/zwembad_aanleggen_zwembad_aanleg/
[85] Logo ontwerpen: http://www.seozoekmachineoptimalisatie.be/logo-ontwerp/
[86] Pleisterwerken prijs: http://www.hanssen-pleisterwerken.be/pleisterwerken/
[87] Pur vloerisolatie: http://www.apchapewerken.be/vloerisolatie_isolatie_vloer_isoleren/pur_vloerisolatie_pur/
[88] Search Engine: http://fast-ranking.org/seo
[89] very smart and considerate.: http://yeastinfectionforwomen.com/
[90] http://www.superdak.be/dakrenovatie-renovatie-dak-renoveren/: http://www.superdak.be/dakrenovatie-renovatie-dak-renoveren/
[91] Dak vernieuwen: http://www.superdak.be/dakrenovatie-renovatie-dak-renoveren/
[92] Dakrenovatie: http://www.superdak.be/dakrenovatie-renovatie-dak-renoveren/
[93] seosoftware: http://pageoneinfiltrators.com
[94] Seo: http://www.sempris.be/zoekmachine-marketing-diensten/seo/
[95] Seo Sempris: http://www.sempris.be/zoekmachine-marketing-diensten/seo/
[96] Limburg webdesign: http://www.seozoekmachineoptimalisatie.be/webdesign-limburg/
[97] Webdesign & Seo: http://www.seozoekmachineoptimalisatie.be/webdesign-seo-limburg/
[98] [email protected]: http://www.BlueHatSEO.commailto:[email protected]

Click here to print.